Radiation? - "Hiroshima Study Finds No Genetic Damage"!

Pacific War: Tokyo & Japan fire-bombed - 6 & 9 Aug 1945 - Hiroshima & Nagasaki nuke & radiation myths

Radiation? - "Hiroshima Study Finds No Genetic Damage"!

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 19 Apr 2011 01:24

Reuters
Published: August 01, 1990

A 40-year study of thousands of Japanese who survived the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki shows radiation exposure did not cause genetic damage that could lead to human mutations, a researcher said today.

The researcher, John Boice of the National Cancer Institute said, ''Ionizing radiation is known to cause heritable mutations in many species of plants and animals, but intense study of 70,000 offspring of atomic bomb survivors has failed to identify an increase in congenital abnormalities, cancer, chromosome aberrations or mutational blood protein changes.''

Mr. Boice's comments were published in the current issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association


http://www.nytimes.com/1990/08/01/us/hi ... amage.html
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Re: "Hiroshima Study Finds No Genetic Damage"

Postby NUKELIES » 20 Apr 2011 00:41

FirstClassSkeptic wrote:failed to identify an increase in congenital abnormalities, cancer, chromosome aberrations or mutational blood protein changes.'


So basically no radiation.
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: "Hiroshima Study Finds No Genetic Damage"

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 07 May 2011 16:43

''Ionizing radiation is known to cause heritable mutations in many species of plants and animals


I would like them to show me one plant from Hiroshima or Nagasaki that has mutated.

in Hiroshima and Nagasaki may plague the human race for thousands of years. ...
LIFE 1947

I seem to remember that Crawford Sams mentions Life magazine specifically as spready propoganda about the atomic bomb. And he does use that word; propoganda.

http://books.google.com/books?id=60kEAA ... CD0Q6AEwCA



http://books.google.com/books?id=JAkAAA ... ma&f=false
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Re: "Hiroshima Study Finds No Genetic Damage"

Postby rerevisionist » 08 May 2011 19:12

I Googled 'Hiroshima radiation' - the first 100 results all stated or implied that there was radiation there, or radiation effects, or 'survivors' etc - plus a few malware sites. It's quite striking how myths become entrenched by simple repetition, many of the online articles being practically identical.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: "Hiroshima Study Finds No Genetic Damage"

Postby EyesWideOpen » 09 May 2011 03:32

There was a lot of Thermal Radiation on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Types of Burn Injuries

Chemical Burns - Caused by contact with caustic chemicals, such as acids, alkalis, detergents, or solvents
Electrical Burns - Caused by contact with strong electrical currents
Radiation burns - Caused by X-rays, ultraviolet rays, sunlight, and tanning beds
Thermal burns - Caused by flames, steam, and scalding liquids

What they like to do is play with words, such as confusing/manipulating THERMAL RADIATION into "RADIATION". Fire/Heat is THERMAL energy in the process of transfer across (RADIATION) a boundary of one region of matter to another.

Anyone burned by FIRE/HEAT on Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Tokyo, Dresden ect.. is a victim of Thermal Radiation or "Radiation" if you want to deceive.

Many people with severe burns (Thermal Radiation) die from dehydration and infection in the days/weeks following their injuries.
EyesWideOpen
 
Posts: 54
Joined: 09 May 2011 03:07

Re: "Hiroshima Study Finds No Genetic Damage"

Postby NUKELIES » 09 May 2011 09:07

EyesWideOpen wrote:Anyone burned by FIRE/HEAT on Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Tokyo, Dresden ect.. is a victim of Thermal Radiation or "Radiation" if you want to deceive.


Excellent point. The lie matrix is unendingly complex.
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: "Hiroshima Study Finds No Genetic Damage"

Postby bamzam » 23 May 2011 21:56

I'm really trying to find a news video I saw a while back of people who were actually going out to a former nuclear test site and basically hanging out in bathing suits to soak up the radiation for its health benefits. I guess this video seminar of gary sandquist explaining how low level radiation can be good for you will have to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rW-EwP-DNE
bamzam
 
Posts: 18
Joined: 20 May 2011 05:53

Re: "Hiroshima Study Finds No Genetic Damage"

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 23 May 2011 23:35

The next time you are looking at burn victims of Hiroshima, take note that they are usually young people. This is because younger people have a greater tendency to form keloid scar tissue over a burn area.

There are also certain races of people that have a greater tendency to develop keloid tissue.

Keloids are found in about 15% of the population and are more prevelant in people with dark (African or Asian) skin. The cause of Keloids is not entirley known, but they usually (but not always) follow an injury. Keloids tend to occur from the age of 10 and 30 and occur mainly on the chest, ear or shoulders.


http://www.scartreatment.co.uk/typesofscars.html
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Return to WW2 Japan - Proofs that Hiroshima & Nagasaki were not A-Bombed


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest