Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers? Are they really nuclear powered?

Dumploads? Covert uses? Radiation? Submarines? Chernobyl, Fukushima &c. Coal, oil, wind, solar. Electric grids

Re: Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers?

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 14 Feb 2012 15:27

Speaking of pictures; submariner, why don't you take extensive pictures of the insides of that sub, and post them here.

"Oh, I can't do that' it's national security."

And so it goes.
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Re: Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers?

Postby Lark » 14 Feb 2012 22:23

I have heard of subs staying under the ice cap for weeks at a time, but never 6 months. What sub was it you claim did it for 6 months?

There are lots of sub interior pics on the internet you can find using google. They look just like what I see in the shipyard before they get taken apart for repairs or disposal. A person can take pics of the sub as long as they have a photo pass, but they do not just hand them out like candy.
Lark
 
Posts: 42
Joined: 05 Nov 2011 18:52

Re: Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers?

Postby NuclearSubmariner » 15 Feb 2012 03:25

Yeah, you can get pictures of pretty much anything, except the inside of the RC and the Ship Control Panel. You can actually go on facebook and find pictures from underway.
Here's a few that I have on hand:
Image
Image
Image
Image

I don't think that you remember that ice cap story correctly. No sub carries a six month loadout, it's usually around three months and they get stores onloaded as needed.

Also, please don't tell me you guys think the moon landings are fake too.
NuclearSubmariner
 
Posts: 8
Joined: 08 Feb 2012 06:02

Re: Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers?

Postby BNSF9647 » 15 Feb 2012 11:50

"Also, please don't tell me you guys think the moon landings are fake too."


Hope you dont believe they went to the moon. Now whats the problem with getting a picture of the vessels control panel and so called reactors this isnt secret technology. I imagine they dont want people to see that subs, and carriers are powered by conventional means. Perhaps your reactor is nothing but a giant capacitor, or battery per say.
User avatar
BNSF9647
 
Posts: 11
Joined: 23 Jan 2012 00:06
Location: Michigan

Re: Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers?

Postby Exorcist » 15 Feb 2012 13:16

NuclearSubmariner wrote:They are launched out by filling the missile tube with nitrogen. Then a small rocket motor attached to the tube flash boils about 30 gallons of water into steam, which propels the missile up, wrapped in a protective bubble of nitrogen.



NuclearSubmariner wrote:.There was an incident with one a year or so ago, where the missile techs forgot to secure one of the "water bowls"


Sounds like complete bull$hit to me. Have you any pictures of this "small rocket motor" and this "water bowl" containing 4 cubic ft of water......Are you sure you are not confusing it with a water closet or are the loos on a different level?....lol

I'm still waiting for you to comment on your employer's lies here:

https://nuke-lies/www.nukelies.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=524

.....and here:

https://nuke-lies/www.nukelies.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=552
User avatar
Exorcist
 
Posts: 73
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 14:21
Location: UK

Re: Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers?

Postby NuclearSubmariner » 15 Feb 2012 14:20

The reason you can't take pictures of the RC is that it's radioactive. For the SCP, it's that it shows our max depth and speed, which I'm fairly certain everyone already knows, but whatever.

I've got to go soon, so here's some links:
https://www.patents.com/us-7451680.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:James_Kemp/Trident_missile

Or just search: missile, gas generator, submarine
NuclearSubmariner
 
Posts: 8
Joined: 08 Feb 2012 06:02

Re: Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers?

Postby Lark » 15 Feb 2012 17:20

BNSF9647 wrote:"Also, please don't tell me you guys think the moon landings are fake too."


Hope you dont believe they went to the moon. Now whats the problem with getting a picture of the vessels control panel and so called reactors this isnt secret technology. I imagine they dont want people to see that subs, and carriers are powered by conventional means. Perhaps your reactor is nothing but a giant capacitor, or battery per say.


The only large power cables going into the reactor compartment are for the pumps. The cables attached to the reactor (what you suggest might be a battery or capacitor) are too small to carry lots of current to run a large electric motor.
Last edited by Lark on 15 Feb 2012 17:25, edited 1 time in total.
Lark
 
Posts: 42
Joined: 05 Nov 2011 18:52

Re: Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers?

Postby Lark » 15 Feb 2012 17:24

Exorcist wrote:Sounds like complete bull$hit to me. [/url]


Is everything you are not familiar with comlete BS? You can't even understand that a shipyard might have a computer with internet access and that a worker might have access to it during the day. But here we are exchanging messages. :)
Lark
 
Posts: 42
Joined: 05 Nov 2011 18:52

Re: Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers?

Postby BNSF9647 » 16 Feb 2012 01:02

Lark wrote:
BNSF9647 wrote:"Also, please don't tell me you guys think the moon landings are fake too."


Hope you dont believe they went to the moon. Now whats the problem with getting a picture of the vessels control panel and so called reactors this isnt secret technology. I imagine they dont want people to see that subs, and carriers are powered by conventional means. Perhaps your reactor is nothing but a giant capacitor, or battery per say.


The only large power cables going into the reactor compartment are for the pumps. The cables attached to the reactor (what you suggest might be a battery or capacitor) are too small to carry lots of current to run a large electric motor.



Find out what gauge those cables are. Suggesting a reactor if you want to call it that, being a large capacitor or battery is very plausible. It would simply be recharged by the steam plant. At the same time the steam plant could very well power an electric boiler or heater cores to boil water to steam.
User avatar
BNSF9647
 
Posts: 11
Joined: 23 Jan 2012 00:06
Location: Michigan

Re: Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers?

Postby Lark » 16 Feb 2012 14:32

The cables going to the reactor are no larger than one of my thick extension cords at home. They power electric motors that move the control rods. The propulsion plant is a heat engine. The reactor supplies the heat to the steam generators, the steam spins the turbines, the condensers are the heat sink and feed pumps supply water back to the steam generators. It is simple and in plain sight in the engine room and reactor compartment.

There is a small diesel generator and a battery, but they are too small to move the boat more than a few knots. I have never seen any other heat source on a nuclear sub.

It is a simple matter for any American to get a job in the shipyard, get a confidential clearance and see this stuff for themselves. I was told that the confidential security clearance is not much more than a credit check. Nobody that I know told me about anyone talking to them about me for a clearance.

I was interviewed last year about one of my neighbors who was getting his top secret clearance renewed. She wanted to know about any trouble I might have seen at his place and if the police were ever there. I gave kind of boring answers until she asked about drinking, then she wanted to know all about that. He is just a beer drinker as far as I know, so that was boring too I guess. After I told my neighbor about the interview he laughed and said some of his friends were interviewed too. One of them refused to answer questions about his drinking and another guy said he never drank the hard stuff because his wife kept the liquor cabinet locked up. :) He got his clearance renewed eventually
Lark
 
Posts: 42
Joined: 05 Nov 2011 18:52

Re: Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers?

Postby Exorcist » 16 Feb 2012 14:46

NuclearSubmariner wrote:Also, please don't tell me you guys think the moon landings are fake too.

Sailor Boy.........refute this:

https://nuke-lies/www.nukelies.com/forum/elites-jews-number-needed-for-control.html

NuclearSubmariner wrote:I've got to go soon, so here's some links:


Sailor Boy......you forgot to comment on the lies told by your employer I pointed you to in a previous post.....maybe you can comment on your next visit or is that the responsibility of the Pentagon Painting and Decorating Department?
User avatar
Exorcist
 
Posts: 73
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 14:21
Location: UK

Re: Nuclear submarines? Nuclear aircraft carriers?

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 16 Feb 2012 20:22

supposed submariners
'sub' picture, brightened up a bit, visitors
282128_222196614484023_100000810594001_551037_6424638_n.jpg (58.13 KiB) Viewed 51 times


Looks like some tourists.
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Return to Nuclear Power Doubts: Nuclear Disasters? Safe Power? Is 'Nuclear Power' a Hoax?


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest