From an online series of cartoons  

  American cartoon (from Kentucky?)

  From a children's Book

  From a TV ad

Anne Wilson: Mixed Race Children

A study of identity [1987]

---

Or at least a few dozen. Cared for by the British.   Propagandised by Jews for Ever-Increasing Numbers.

---

Thirty years ago-ish. This book was published in 1987 by Allen and Unwin, described as 'The Academic Imprint of Unwin Hyman Ltd'. Note the explicit Jewishness. (They published Bertrand Russell, after a First World War speech that revealed he knew nothing of the issues. If you like details, you might like Russell ... dupe.

We're into a world of gossip, scandal, title-tattle, kids talking about clothes and TV, utterly without substance. 51 children and 39 mothers were 'recruited' around early 1980. Incidentally, the Library of Congress bumph lists 'Children of interracial marriage' as a heading. The 'interracial marriage' is worth highlighting; abandoned and discarded half-castes are ignored, as are damaged wives. It's rather painful to try to read between the lines: councils forced to house, council borrowings forced up, schoolchildren whose potential gains are ruined. Wilson has no idea about academic processes and attitudes; no wonder, as she in any serious sense has none herself. What is as painful is he lack of knowledge of anything practical. For example, many parts of the Mediterranean have left people with sickle-cell anaemia/ thalassaemia, a genetic condition which cannot be removed. Some have diabetes, which may be genetic, though such is the state of medical education that practitioners of various grades are told to pretend there's no difference from sugar-induced diabetes. In that sense Wilson is like a whore carrying out instructions to spread syphilis. She has no concerns over housing, or the perpetual irritants left behind when people with no entitlement are given products other people's work.

The author (b 1955) is or says she's a 'sociologist' and accordingly this is a 'study' rather than a book. I assume she mean she got what's called a degree. This book resulting aged about 32.

This is where we have to move the the nitty-gritty on unwanted relationship. I've omitted to mention the Jewish element much; I wonder whether Wilson is 'Jew Aware' by now. I'd guess not. The plain fact is that Jews, by money power converted by way of controlled banks and outfits such as the Fed, World Bank, and so on, control the media and education to such as extent that many people are simply unaware of the miasma they live in. The LSE ['London School of Economics'] was of course Jewish; poor labourers could not chip in. Ever since the so-called 'Labour Party' has been a vehicle for Jews, starting at the time of the Boer War mass killings. The Acknowledgements list Jews: The Social Science Research Council ('now the Economic and Social Science Research Council'), Professor Percy Cohen, Dr E I Hopper, Mike Herbert who 'gave unflagging friendship and support') Ros Schwarz who read the manuscript, Mark Wilson who 'made the book possible... financial, intellectual, emotional...'. And Carol Carnall 'of the national organization for interracial families called Harmony...'
      I'm not going to guess whether 100% think they're Jews; and by searching LSE for 'Mark Wilson' b 1952 couldn't confidently located he hubby or ex. But people new to this topic must wake themselves up by investigating Jews as a superstitious criminal subculture, parasitic on others and offloading costs and lives onto them—in this case, whites. You might try big-lies.org or home in on the new piece on Jews collectively mass killing whites, Chinese and others in the Second World War.

And with Dr Johnson's female preacher, there's surprise to see these things written at all. The Jewish ringmaster, with his stick and carrot, and secret supporting cast, squeeze out the contorted wording like plaster toothpaste, and the elephant totters around from one inverted drum to the next. The sheer ignorance is overwhelming: Wilson doesn't knew the Atlantic slave trade was run by Jews. She knows nothing of Jewish history, or of course the oddities passed on to official Christianity and its virtue-signalling unemployables. The US Civil War? Oh well, not worth mentioning. What about sad crops of war bastards? Just move on. But I'd guess the waving of paper academic flags gets really serious over Jews: mention Jew murders in the USSR?—Really, Anne, I hardly think you're worth your MA!  Jews in Palestine killing Arabs?—Good heavens, no LSE person believes that's even true, as the 'Holocaust' of course is. Racial differences?—You should know by now that only Jews are worth race supremacy and discrimination.

Just a few points:

• 'The traditional stereotype of 'mixed race' children is that they are 'between black and white', that they have identity problems, and that they 'don't fit in anywhere'.—I'd say a more convincing stereotype is leftovers , 'the dust of war'. [From the cover blurb]
• 'In January 1994, the Council of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland (RAIGB) adopted a motion in which it expressed its concern "at the increased use of 'mixed race' in Britain", since this implies that there are "pure races". ... at least use the preferable "mixed parentage" ("mixed origin" is preferred by the RAIGB)' [Radio Times 17-23 June 1995]. Amusing and typically Jewish absurdity.
        Meanings by various parties of 'coloured', brown', 'black', 'white' etc are chuntered over; in full silly-woman mode.
• It's sigh-inducing to see Wilson defining 'mixed race' children as having one white parent, apparently therefore not bothering with other mixtures, and giving superiority to whites
• So-called 'Jews' are referred to as a race, with no explanation. I'd guess they had long disputes about this terrifically serious issue.
• Kenneth and Mamie Clark in 1939 carry out 'research' with black and white dolls to try to assess kids' self images. (pp 38ff). As might be expected a whole chapter of 'writing' follows.
• Page 8 has discussion on the contrast between black and white and its 'great psychological significance in Western culture.' In fact of course there's almost no mention of blacks, unsurprisingly as there were hardly any and hardly anyone knew of them. This is another variety of Jewish fantasy, evolved after many years of mastication on nothing.
• The books lists information about 'photographs' made in a primary school in Ealing, and supervised by people from the LSE! Possibly they may be online, but not in the book. Part of course of the continual push by Jews to invade Europe and other 'white' countries.
• Perhaps worth noting [this was 'worth nothing'—a typo?] the 'Scarman Report' was 1981.
• There's some risible stuff about black GIs, and supposed black supervirility; I wonder if Mark was a cuckold?
• Page 101 mentions The Social Atlas of London by Shepherd, Westway and Lee, 1974). This may in effect be a guide to immigrants and their Jewish handlers, but I don't remember or know it. It sounds as accurate as Gilbert Martin's fake maps of German sites where Jews were killed.
• Chapter 7, The Mother's Views of Racism (p 152) is about twenty pages of gossip. Note that fathers aren't even in the index.
• The last chapter is entitled Conclusions, but is just more trivia. It does say that 'more research is needed'. I wonder how many copies this sold, even allowing for compulsory reading-list purchases. Astonishingly, only a few dozen people were interviewed, and all them were from an organization apparently by Jews for 'interracial families'. In other words, they were all cossetted and probably well off (though as usual with Jews details are zero.)

In other words, this tiny survey is worthless. I'd guess it was intended as a holding operation, while numbers and problems built up for whites.
      Let me emphasise the comparison with 'war babies': Jews love wars with rape—think of the end of the Second World War, for example. Naturally it sows social horrors and lifetimes ruined, which Jews want to 'goyim'. Jewish media of course are careful to omit rape and violent threats against women, and have sufficient power to prevent such women having legal redress.

RW 8 July 2019

---

Note on human races, and mixtures of races, by Rerev, added Jan 2020: Jewish money controls most 'science' research. They have done everything possible to conceal facts about race, including suppression of information on race mixing.
      T Teo (in 2004) The Historical Problematization of "Mixed Race" ... which I removed, as it is so weak, (pdf file; free download) has typically confused information and little science, starting with Hitler as a marker. The chapter hints at the vast concealment by Jews, and the tame controlled scientists, of the literally vital secrets of mixed human races.
      It's important to understand why Jews are hypersensitive on race-mixing.
      • [1] Jews are exceptionally prone to genetic defects, and keep this fact hidden as much as possible. Partly to offload the huge costs onto host communities. And partly to reduce mockery of their claims to be 'Chosen' by 'G-d'. (Moslems have the same genetic weaknesses and motivations).
      • [2] Jews want to pretend all other human races are indistinguishable.
      • [3] Jews at present want to pretend that they are a race of their own, but, at the same time, there is female descent only. The motive seems to be to allow rape by (male) Jews, but not acknowledge any rights of 'goy' victims.

1965   Myron Coureval Fagan's booklet How greatest [sic; there's no 'the'] white nations were mongrelized, then negroized: That is the fate planned for the American people.

      Fagan (1887-1972) may well have been a crypto-Jew. A Jewish policy is to 'warn' whites of some atrocity they're planning. Obviously, this is done in a Talmudic, hair-splitting, not very clear way. This booklet came out in 1965 and may be a Jewish thing, designed to tip off whites that the 1965 Hart-Cellar Act had the intention to racially change the USA. Fagan rants about 'Reds' and 'Communists' rather than the explicit 'Jews'. I think he omits Jews and the Federal Reserve, Jews in the USSR, Jews in both world wars. Clearly, as a warning, it's absurdly half-hearted and was probably either ignored, laughed-at, or regarded as fanatical.
      Fagan's evidence concerns Egypt, and claims to be based on Abraham Lincoln, but is presumably Biblical—or more accurately Old Testament. He adds comments on Brazil, suggesting he may have been a Marrano Jew.
      Wikipedia has no information on his background, family, and early life. He shows all the marks of Jewishness, for example having a film and stage career. His activities during the Second World War are cmpletely missing from Wikipedia.
      I may as well copy Wikipedia's list from 198 of his publications, which mostly seem small-scale; these are referred to as: News-bulletin / Cinema Educational Guild - whatever that means.

Note the marks of blackwashing and disinformation: all Jewish lies, particularly on World Wars and money and media control, are never criticised. Cuba and supposed nuclear weapons are another example; so is 'brainwashing'. The possibly serious stuff is deliberately ruined by incomplete evidence, distraction, and screeching style. Note that I haven't read or seen most of these items; judge for yourself!

1948 Red stars in Hollywood: Their helpers, fellow travelers, and co-conspirators
1948 Moscow over Hollywood
1949 Moscow marches on in Hollywood
1950 Reds in the Anti-Defamation League
1950 Reds in "crusade for freedom!"
1950 Hollywood reds are on the run!
1950 Documentation of the Red stars in Hollywood.
1950 Reds in the Anti-Defamation League.
1951 What is this thing called anti-semitism?
1951 Saga of Operation Survival
1953 Hollywood backs U.N. conspiracy
1954 Red Treason on Broadway
1956 United Nations "on trial" in Washington, D.C.
1962 Must we have a Cuban "Pearl Harbor?"
1964 How Hollywood is brainwashing the people
1964 Civil rights, most sinister tool of the great conspiracy
1965 How greatest white nations were mongrelized, then negroized: That is the fate planned for the American people
1966 The UN already secret government of U.S.!: Our recall project can smash it!
1966 The complete truth about the "United Nations" conspiracy!
1967 You must decide fate of our nation!!!: The Negro (CFR) plot is our greatest menace!
1969 Proofs of the great conspiracy and how to smash it!!!

Wikipedia says: Between 1967 and 1968 Fagan recorded a set of three spoken-word LP records titled The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations. Produced by Anthony Hilder, the records presented the Bavarian Illuminati, the Protocols of Zion, and internationalist politics as faces of a single grand "Luciferian" conspiracy directed by the Rothschild family. Sounds like 90 minutes of complication, maybe intended ultimately to unsuccessfully blackwash the Rothschilds, much as the Dreyfus Affair operated.

There have been many attempts at world history, some of them by race. Here are my book reviews on these topics. Some, such as Toynbee and Quigley, try with conventional history. Some take an evolutionary approach, such as Darlington's Evolution on Man and Society. Lothrop Stoddard is mostly small-scale. Some are of course US-centred: Wayne Macleod (1968) and Elmer Pendell (1975?) may have been based on Fagan. Arthur Kemp's March of the Titans (1999) is not Jew-aware; maybe a future edition will be aware.
      Today, with archaeology, plus DNA, plus observations—on genetics, on Christianity in theory and in practice, and on the Talmud in theory and practice, and on revisionist material—seems to offer hope for serious study, if people can be found able to co-operate.

RW 2019-04-23

Incogman also calls himself Phillip Marlowe. He has had his political comment site for many years. One of his techniques is to collect together cases of black violence against whites, usually in the USA. These generally are unreported, or mentioned without vivid detail. However, censors are getting worryingly active.

Incogman looks at causes, for example George Soros, the self-styled Jew from Hungary.

This is to report now (Dec 2020) that Incogman has at least two video sites:

https://gab.com/INCOGMAN   but I can't guarantee it will remain online.

and

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/incogman/   but I can't guarantee it will remain online.

He doesn't seem to bother with US violence against other countries. I think he supported most or all US wars.

Tom Kawczynski   Someone Has to Say It - The Hidden History of How America Was Lost (2018)

Someone has to say it.   But it's not Kawczynski     Yawn: banned by Amazon  
Review by Rerevisionist

---

The Occidental Observer put up an online review of this book on 1 August 2018 by Russell James, who also wrote an interview with Kawczynski on 2nd February, after Kawczynski 'made it into the news', as media hacks put it—obviously, it was decided to push him. Russell James seems to be a gullible American, who believes e.g. that the USA was 'a prosperous land in the 1950s — a land whose cities were the jewels of the world.' There was a media campaign of a sort that skeptics will suspect of being a systematic typically Jewish teaser campaign, including violence. ('The attack was swift, coordinated, deliberate, and deceitful...') Kawczynski is described as a 'town manager' of Jackman, Maine, population about 1000. (See Google Street View; for no reason, I was amused to see the Jackman Motel is/was next to a taxidermist). My best guess is that this is a psyop of some sort. Red Ice has an interview with him. There was some connection with gab.ai, some sort of Jewish video site. The number of variously 'outed' people - Richard Spencer, 'Tommy Robinson', 'Alex Jones', Ilana Mercer ad infinitum and nauseam gets ever-longer; and ditto with events. It genuinely has been a Jewish activity across millennia. Kawczynski seems to have a site asking for donations. All this is hard to assess; it would take a lot of effort to dig out the truth.

[Maybe it's worth noting that 'Kakzynski' looks a similar name and has suspicions, such as the so-called 'Unabomber', around him]

This book has a couple of odd aspects. The title page says the contents are 'As Told by: Tom Kawczynski'. Does that mean he didn't write it? And there is no publisher: my copy was 'Printed in Great Britain by Amazon'. Amazon has a heavy policy of censorship; it's unlikely they would print serious political commentary. My best guess is that Kawczynski, whether aware or not, is just another Jew-operated puppet. I think it's likely the content of this book was supplied by one of the countless Jew 'experts' on propaganda. Unless you believe Kawczynski reads Hegel, knows about medical history, is familiar with wartime archives, etc. etc.

I'll review this book on the assumption that it follows a Jewish script, so that we can infer what lies Jews are currently trying out. Chapter 8 ('The Last Stand of Traditional America') has this (p 104): '.. I know many people exist within Jewry and every other group who are just as aware and troubled by what their compatriots have done. In truth. they're some of the biggest supporters of my effort to bring these arguments into the light...' What 'other groups' who are 'compatriots' of Jews are, is not stated. But it may be that since early 2018 Kawczynski has been selected to lead, or pretend to lead.

I won't list the Jewish slang/ sloganistic chapter titles. (There are 28). I'll try to summarise where Kawczynski is leading, or, probably being guided.

• Kawczynski says he follows a Christian faith. ('Christian legacy of love and charity'). I'd guess Roman Catholic, judging by his Slavic surname; incidentally he may be just another descendant of central European Jews. The book is unindexed, and it's hard to work out what he knows about Christianity, if anything. Because it's so dependent on Judaism, I don't think Christianity is a way forward; Articles on Jews gives my reasons. But it looks as though the Jew 'elites' want simple Christians to do their usual stuff: war crimes, doing what they're told.
• His first enemy is Moslems. He doesn't point out that Jews forced immigration of Moslems into white countries. This of course is a standard Jewish line, the other being that Moslems are hardworking, valuable citizens who deserve all the benefits they are given.
• Jews and world events. There's much less of this than is needed. The Federal Reserve appears on p 28 but is soft-pedalled; the beneficiary of the scam is presented, wrongly, ss 'the Government'. The cui bono idea appears on p 14, as 'who benefits?' BUT of course in many cases the holding companies, unaudited Fed, 'black' secret places, offshore secrecies make it impossible to find out who benefits. The 'Russian Revolution' is 'run by radicals who were predominantly Jews' elides over the vast USSR atrocities, and, if there is a connection with US Jew bankers, I couldn't find it. Probably this was permitted since there's an anti-Russian campaign at present.
• Arms, weapons, money. No comment on this issue. It's said "The US practically doesn't make anything any more except weapons', but this aspect of Jewish activity is omitted.
• In keeping with the Jewish pretence that individuals drive events, we have mentions of Presidents: 'At least F D Roosevelt created jobs', LBJ did this and that, Nixon did this and that ('the media parlayed that deception [Tet?] into a grand maneuver designed to begin the long process of extracting America from Vietnam' - Kawczynski hasn't understood Jew won the Vietnam War, with mass casualties, weapons tests, huge profits, and control over money), Obama, the 'great white hope' wanted this and that. The unified groups such as AIPAC are omitted. The 1960s are a Jew-propaganda evil, since of course they want to not mention US war crimes in the Vietnam invasion. This is regarded as 'individualistic' in the rather sad US pretence system; in fact, hardly anyone dared strike out on their own. This was no doubt influenced by the 'nuke' scare about which Kawczynski says nothing useful. He even thinks (p 103) the Rosenbergs were spies, rather than just more Jew actors.
• On the Holohoax, he says honest discussion is difficult—without saying why. (I was amazed to see Töben of the Adelaide Institute recommended this book as a gift, despite dodging his key issue).
• On the 'Cold War', Stalin is described as 'hard left', in absurd Jewish slang. Kawczynski discusses the 'Bay of Pigs', clearly unaware of Castro's Jewish roots and US bases in Cuba.
• There are endless messy discussions: stacking the Courts (78), the beliefs, supposedly held by bureaucrats, that they could create a utopia (p 102), the 'Korean War is still not resolved', etc. The role of Rothschild banking is not understood by Kawczynski; discussion on how pre-1945 banks worked is suppressed.
• Several chapter look at golden ages material, mostly myth. p 218 says 'since the dawn of human history, man has lived in balance with the land', which I leave to my readers to crit. There's material on 'allopathy' and 'naturopathy', and on Prohibition, of alcohol, which may (or may not) have prevented alcohol's use as a fuel, and on 'junk food'. I couldn't find DuPont vs hemp, to my surprise.

There's a lot more—'No one wanted the bailout of Wall Street in 2008', for example. No one?

This is awful stuff; I doubt it's usefulness even to the most naïve American, since it has no thread running through it, doesn't face serious truths against and for whites, and replaces the Jew-enforced mass media rubbish with a marginally different version of the same.

---

'His' book mentions a few websites. gab.ai has been outed as a Jewish video site. (It is listed by alexa.com as #3000 in the USA; bitchute is listed higher, at #2400).

A site attributed to 'John Young' is europeanamericansunited.com 'created' in 2007, updated on 2017-12-31, though it is below alexa's radar. It says nothing about Karl Marx as rich, a relative of the Rothschilds and promoter of a ridiculous 'proletariat' mythology. It says nothing on the fact that Jews have promoted race invasion into white countries, for many years. It has silly Christmas stories, aimed, presumably, at simple Americans who don't know 'Jews' invented organised Christianity. It seems to have a 'support US troops' policy without mentioning Jewish control of policy. It comments on US 'education': most US 'students' think America invented slavery, for example! It is, in short, very sad stuff. I think a related site claims the Holohoax is the worst extermination ever. To anyone concerned with the world and its future, this material is terrifyingly deathly.

Kawczynski (Kawzinsky? Kawzinski? Cawzhinsky? Cawzinski?) has a new projected, 'created' 3 March 2018, built with 'storefront - the best ecommerce platform for wordpress'. There are some astonishingly long-winded scripts, which must have been assembled by some 'Jewish' 'brains'. Some of them are quite amusing, e.g. material on unemploytemtnat an all-time low in the US, whcih he couldn't possibly hae researched himself. Of course there's nothing on Jew finances, Fed, etc.

---

Incidentally, Britain has an MP [member of Parliament] for an area where Muslim rape gangs have been ignored by politicians. Daniel Kawczynski was elected in 2017 for the 'Conservative Party'; I'd guess a relative. His 'Labour Party' opponent was Laura Davies, a 'former major in the Royal Army Medical Corps'. If I'm reading them right, the unfortunate electors had a choice between two Jews—it's impossible that a patriotic Pole could become a candidate.

---

I started this review with a link from The Occidental Observer which is showing strong signs of losing its way. The simple formula of honest individualistic European hunter-gatherers living by military reputation needs an overhaul. (Consider Evelyn Whitehead: "... [American] women are timid. ... It shows in their houses. Every house is furnished alike. No one dares be different. The monotony is so deadly that every time I go into one more such, I could scream". She was not the only person to make such an observation.)   Personally, I hope revisionism will extend and deepen.

RW 22/23 Aug 2018

Mahathir bin Mohamad: The Malay Dilemma (1970)

---

I've owned a copy of this book for many years; it seems to be the first of many. It dates from the time the USA, under Jew direction, had carried out genocide in Vietnam (with allies such as Britain) and had probably worked out a scheme for owning assets and exploiting a central bank. With control of the media by Jews—and unprecedented effectiveness of TV—probably they foresaw no difficulties with small matters such as mass murder, chemical experiments, and mass rapes by Americans. So with some relief, and puzzlement, I found this book, which is relatively calm, dispassionate, unfanatical, and intelligent. Mahathir bin Mohamad is part of a confusing area, with Moslem influences, Chinese and Malay groups, Indian labour, Singapore, the leftovers of British officialdom, and so on. He became Prime Minister of Malaya in 1981, according to my notes. I was reminded of him by the usual frantic absurdity of Jews: Mahathir bin Mohamad was described as anti-Semitic, overtly anti-Semitic, and the rest of it.

When trying to get the feel of such areas, it is useless to rely on pets of Jews. They will be 'leaders' who had to be told they were leaders by Jews. They will no doubt quote The Economist, and academics funded by Jews. People such a Matathir bin Mohamad (I'm tempted to write 'pbuh') are therefore valuable, in the same way that honest Jew-aware people in the USA, Europe, Africa and so on are more useful than credo-quoting puppets. This is not a detailed review; I'm concerned mainly to suggest that Jew-aware writers are likely to be far more useful than simple money-grabbing politicians.

Briefly, he's an 'educated Malay', concerned to make Malay the official language, move trade and education away from Chinese and Indian minorities. Malay is now the official language, and 'Tuan' is an official honorific meaning 'Mister'—Malays are or were very polite and deferential, and this allows some ambiguity. This book has good descriptions of things like Chinese business practices and bargaining: 'East of Suez prices are never fixed', and Malays' tendency to 'not understand the potentialities of money', and a survey of what makes nations and citizens. I could find nothing about British or (((British))) 'anti-Communism'. I'd guess his opinions became more explicit in the long interval after 1970 to May 2018, when he became Prime Minister for the second time. And he may have found out (e.g.) that Jews invented Islam.

He had a fairly high opinion of the British, when not involved in world muddles. There was divide and rule between Chinese and Indian immigrants, town Malays, and country Malays. Roads were just for export of rubber and tin. They ruled well, with civil service, law and order, settling of minor wars, putting down piracy, collecting taxes—actually spent on public services.
      But British treaties and 'advice' were hypocritical, and they were generous with other peoples' land—notably of Palestine. But World War 2 and Japan crushed faith in Britain. There's much more, some very probably outdated. On migrations, Mahathir is straightforward, not even considering the Jewish fantasist lies. I'll give some notes I made. My point really is that the author seems to have a helpful, objective, top-down view of races, totally different from the Jewish fanatical media-control, money control, and violence attitude.

Malays: Development of small villages or farms, easy life, 21 | Town, country Malays 26 ff | health neglected by British 28 | Abhor celibacy, 29 | urbanising the rural dwellers would be beneficial, because the most progressive nations have maximum urbanisation, 79, 112 | Moslem inheritance involves splitting up land holdings, 112 | Malays don't understand naturalness of racial discrimination, 113 | good manners to be deferent, unlike Chinese & Indians, 116 | insidious campaign to make Malaya not country of Malays, 122 | international consent and recognition important in national identity 122 | are owners of Malaya 126 and 133, unlike Chinese or Indians, who claim loyalty, but can return | Are the developers of a country its owners? | immigration not severely restricted by Malays, 142 | Ethical codes and culture, which 'have never been studied' 154 ff | Islam, has five interpretations, 155 | Fatalism, 158 | Self-examination, 'know thyself', no equivalent among Malays 159 | Islamic idea of saint, 160 | Courage in sense of standing firm, measuring odds, unknown; Malays usually foolhardy 161 | Plato's three cardinal virtues do not apply, 161 | Careless way time is spent, un-timetable like, 163 | Property and land: old sultanates, a Malay just had to find land to clear then claim right 166 | Land disputes become emotional issues, acrimonious legal wrangles 167 | Attitude to money, tends to be spendthrift 167 | Interest and Usury influenced by Islam | Social code a cause or an effect? 169 | Frankness not part of code 171 | Sultans etc, have done no real harm, supported by most Malays 104 & Titles: whole range, Tunku etc princes, Syeds descendants of prophets: feudal society can be dynamic [e.g. from animism to Hindu to Muslim] if there's dynamism at the top 170, 173 | Malays comparatively not good 176

Review by 'Rerevisionist' of
RACE, REASON and RUBBISH   A Primer of Race Biology for the Plain Man
by
GUNNAR DAHLBERG Director of the State Institute of Human Genetics in the University of Uppsala [Sweden] translated from the Swedish by LANCELOT HOGBEN, F.R.S. Regius Professor of Natural History in the University of Aberdeen

'An Examination of the Biological Credentials of the Nazi Creed'   'Published by GEORGE ALLEN & UNWIN LTD for THE SCIENTIFIC BOOK CLUB 121 CHARING CROSS ROAD LONDON W.C.2   1942; Scientific Book Club edition 1943
This Review: 23 June 2017

---

Dull book (by the same author: Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students) padded with material on race, and with a final chapter supposedly on Jews. The author appears to be an administrator, not a scientist. Both Dahlberg and Hogben presumably worked for the Jew war effort. Interesting as wartime propaganda, not science.

---

It's now known that both Britain and Sweden had considerable numbers of people considering themselves Jews, and who kept their supremacist fantasies (chosen by God!) very secret. Probably this book was intended to fit a gap in the Jewish race war propaganda battle; most of it is a wearying routine trip through cells, freshwater polyps, plants, banana flies, rats, genes, and the algebra of simple random genetic combinations. The book does at least admit that definite answers are not known to important questions. Hogben presumably was a Jew in Britain, perhaps specifically Scotland, and his name must have been added as a sales gimmick, since Hogben admits 'Professor Dahlberg's command of English is much greater than my limited grasp of Scandinavian languages.' On top of the routine material is added Jewish pseudo-science. The two final added chapters are on race, and, inevitably on Jews. The book is unindexed.

I personally remember seeing this book, in a school library; it's in a similar vein to Martin Gardner's and many others.

Pp 219-232, Chapter XII, listed (in the Contents) as The Jewish Question—Conclusion begs a trot-through, as it's the whole point of the book, and the attempt to justify mass slaughter around the world, the Jewish intention all along. Here's a list of the arguments, such as they are:

• Quasi-historical material, e.g. Christians think Jews killed 'Jesus', and Jews think 'Jehovah' has been displeased with them.
• Mixed with speculative history: e.g. assumption Jews never assisted in causing 'bad times', war, and famines. (Child sex, torture, thefts etc are not mentioned).
• 221: New fashion is to consider Jews a race. (This of course is nonsense: believing Jews have considered themselves a race, separate from all goyim.)
• 221 more on race, including Gobineau 'at one time French ambassador at Stockholm', and Houston Chamberlain. 'Neither of them were scientific men'. Dahlberg with colossal dishonesty states there is research which gives 'a critical and reliable summing-up of the scientific position...'
• 222: starts on ordinary people on Jewish unattractive qualities. This of course is the most serious charge, and it's interesting to see Dahlberg squirm. The first rule is to censor out any truths which reflect badly on Jews. Nothing on money and the Federal reserve; nothing on Jewish frauds; nothing on Jews in the USSR; nothing on Jews and wars; nothing on systematic Jew lies, on for example Jewish murders.
      Then there's lawyers and doctors, of course with no detail, for example of Jewish networking, and of actual discoveries if any by Jews, and actual beneficial legal activities by Jews. And no background: 'how cruelly and brutally Christians have treated them..' contrasting with factual material on such matters as tax collection and usury (in the full sense).
• 224: More on race, including '.. Jews are more or less reminiscent of the peoples among whom they live'. Dahlberg says nothing of the maternal descent idea—and its enforcement.
• 226: 'Jews have been compelled to live in towns' argument. Nothing on Talmudic material; nothing on the fact they might have gone away.
• 227: 'Jews develop a special attitude to Gentiles'. 'There are certainly no grounds for thinking that the Jews are worse—rather the contrary.' Dahlberg instances Nobel Prizewinners.
• 228: 'Criminality is not more common among Jews than among Christians.' Remember Dahlberg wrote a book on statistical analysis!
• 229: The argument from what Hogben called horse-sense: ignore the evidence! Along these lines, quoted at some length: .. A person who is excessively tight-fisted, egotistic, and ruthless, is liable to be avoided and gets paid back for it So an intelligent person does not behave in this way. In the long run it is dangerous for a business man to be dishonourable. If he wants his affairs to prosper he must behave as honourably to others... People used to urge that Jews must be morally deficient because they are now avoided as a group. The truth is otherwise. As individuals they are enterprising and have reached positions of prosperity to a comparatively remarkable extent. Their success points to the conclusion that they behave dependably and are not inordinately unscrupulous. ..'
      The non-horse-sense reply is that Jews do their ebst to make sure they are not put in such circumstances. They have their kol nidre 'prayer' as an escape route. All the most distinctive Jew behaviours—committing fraud, then escaping; running such things as the slave trade and trading in women and children; blackmail of politicians; usury in the full sense; indifference to truth when in control of media; fomenting wars—no doubt the reader knows more—are not 'business men' in the sense assumed by Dahlberg.
• 230: Wars have been common, e.g. between nations in Europe. This of course ignores the secret dealings in weaponry, important at least since the invention of cannon and armed ships.
• 231: Dahlberg does not use the Jewish threat argument, unlike most Jew apologetics; I'd guess because of the wartime situation.
• 232: The argument that, even if there were more dishonourable and unscrupulous Jews, there would still be no reason for boycotting or persecuting every Jew.
  Here's a good reply by another reader (June 16, 2017, The Occidental Observer)
  Reply to Ashton:
      Not all Jews are antisocial racketeers, and not all antisocial racketeering is Jewish.
  
  Not all Pakistanis are antisocial racketeers. Does that mean Pakistanis can freely colonize America (or Britain, or Germany, or …) and change American society as they see fit?
  
  Not all Africans are antisocial racketeers. Does that mean Africans can freely colonize America and change American society as they see fit?
  
  Not all Chinese are antisocial racketeers. Does that mean Chinese can freely colonize America and change American society as they see fit?
  
  If your answer to the above questions is "no", why do you make exception for Jews? Jews themselves are a clannish people (the most clannish of them all) and certainly don't have any qualms about treating non-Jews collectively.
  
  Demanding from the native population of any country to distinguish between "good" and "bad" Jews implies the following:
  
  – Jews have an inherent right to reside in that population's homeland;
  – The natives must treat the Jews like they treat their own and must open all their institutions to the Jews;
  – Jews, on the other hand, can freely organize for their own purposes and can exclude the natives from their own organizations;
  
  Obviously, such an arrangement puts the native population at a severe disadvantage and guarantees the eventual Jewish takeover of the host country, with disastrous consequences for the natives, as has happened many times throughout history.
• Dahlberg's chapter ends with stunning dishonesty: he claims they have discussed the 'Jewish question' only from the standpoint of heredity.

ARTHUR KEMP   MARCH OF THE TITANS

Review by 'Rerevisionist'   2 Sept 2018, some additions 27 April 2021

Arthur Kemp’s 'iron law' is all civilizations rise and fall according to their racial homogeneity

---

Arthur Kemp (b 1962, in Rhodesia, later renamed Zimbabwe, for some ruins) obviously missed the 1960s, which were a key stage in post-1945 Jewish activity, notable for the Jew Lyndon Johnson's replacement of J F Kennedy, and the long Vietnam War scheme, presumably intended to raise US debt to Jews, to consume weapons, and take over yet another central bank. It was an exercise in controlled opposition, with (e.g.) 'Students for a Democratic Society' as a Jewish pseudo-opposition-to-war group, including phonies of the Chomsky type, whose role was to prevent mention of Jews in US society, something which was successfully accomplished, as many genuine opponents of the US genocide in Vietnam understand in retrospect. Rhodesia/Zimbabwe gained pseudo-independence when Kemp was about 18, under the Jew puppet Mugabe. Kemp studied at the attractive campus of Cape Town University, and according to his own account, when looking in the 1930s Jagger Library (now the 'Jagger reading rooms') noticed that there were no books on 'whites', considered as a group. This was in 1983. His BA was in 'Political Science, International Politics, and Public Administration', judging by this book's cover. March of the Titans, was first published in 1999. Amazon had been established five years earlier; March of the Titans I think was printed as hardcopy, but later by an online book print-on-demand and distribution company.

      According to the unreliable Wikipedia, Arthur Kemp moved to Britain in 1996, where he ran the BNP's merchandising. He designed the contents of the BNP's WordPress site—world events listed in columns separately from local group news—from 2000, though I think the earlier 1995 version was not his and was definitely inferior. He spoke skillfully at meetings (there's a 'flash' video online of the 'eco-refugee' scam), and he sold books; many BNP annual events called 'Red White and Blue' were popular, but of course were targeted by Jews and their underlings. 2009 was perhaps the best year for the BNP, with elections to the so-called 'European Parliament', structured somewhat on the lines of the USSR, where representatives could speak, but not initiate policies or legislation. But they could collect money and pensions. The BNP gained 2 MEPS, Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons, but in view of election irregularities there must be doubts over all voting results in the English-speaking world—as elsewhere. (Here's my look retrospectively at the BNP in 2011). A few years later, in 2013, Nick Griffin revealed he'd been approached to urge him not to mention Jewish money interests. Brons (and I can't help thinking he was controlled opposition; Bronstein?) spoke in an amiable inconsequential after-dinner style. Kemp severed all ties with Griffin; the main contention seems to have been Kemp's insistence of the need to stop and reverse immigration. Ostara Publications (not I think 'Limited'; and not to be confused with a similarly-named site) was set up to promote March of the Titans and also other books, presumably with copyright considerations (typically public domain 70 years after author death).

      Websites   March of the Titans.com to promote 2011 'Pinnacle' Edition.
      Ostara Publications .com also started 2011.

      Arthur Kemp has connections with The New Observer, started in January 2013. This is a news site, containing fairly short items, I think supplied by Europeans, Americans, and others. Typical titles include (click on Europe | Americas | Middle East | Africa etc in that site): 82,046 Nonwhite Invaders Land in Europe So Far this Year | Nigeria: "Traditional Leader Revokes Voodoo Curses" to Protect African Invaders in Europe | US Justice Department Rips Open Massive Jew School Fraud in New York | John McCain Obituary: Jewish Puppet Warmonger, Responsible for the Death of Millions | 70% + Nonwhite Chicago's Disastrous Finances Portends Second Detroit | "Sh*t Hole" Countries by Race and IQ | South Africa: ANC Has Not "Abandoned Farm Seizures after Trump Tweet" | Nigeria: Power Grid Collapses for 7th Total Blackout This Year |

---

      My copy is a 2018 printing of his Pinnacle Edition (foreword dated 2011). This, 'Pinnacle Edition' is the only one I know for certain has been revised; it includes some genetic material, for example. vi + 686 pages. My copy has no price and no ISBN. I thought perhaps Kemp had abandoned ISBNs. I'm told that ISBNs must all refer to the same identical copy—previously, books could go through many editions, even rewritings, and even picking up new authors, but still be known by the same title. However there are ISBNs for Kemp's one-volume edition, for Vol I: The rise of Europe, and for Vol II Europe and the World. There are hardback, paperback, and Kindle versions. (I wondered if the paperbacks might be cut into chapters, to allow many people to study at one time.) I take it they all have the same contents in different form. If Arthur Kemp reads this, and lets me know, I'll explain if it's possible to print revised versions. It is technically possible with print-on-demand to update books more-or-less continually. Big errors or omissions could be removed.

      New revisionist discoveries (and fakes, counterfeits, lies) come thick and fast. Kemp has emphasised lies about race, just as Kevin MacDonald emphasised lies about racial immigration into the USA. This leaves plenty of scope for past lies and frauds to continue; neither MacDonald nor Kemp have tried to keep up, though Kemp's websites arguably are better than MacDonald's, which largely consist now of bad reviews of bad books. Great issues now include the Jewish fraud of the 'Holocaust', 9/11, and Jews in the Second World War. Probably Amazon would ban Kemp's books from distribution if he were clearer on these topics. (Amazon will not publish my reviews!) This may not be serious—Amazon's discounts may be so large that Kemp might benefit from such a ban, for all I know. On 9/11, Kemp was interviewed, some years ago, by a southern USA man, saying 9/11 was exactly as the authorities had presented it! I think he's less naïve now, though he avoids the issue of false flags and psyops. On the Second World War, the idea that Jews controlled not only the USA, USSR, UK, France, and China, but also Germany, is removed from the New Observer's comments.
      So don't expect full revisionism from this book. I noticed a number of doubtful passages in Titans, for example on Lindbergh and J F Kennedy and Custer, illuminated by Miles Mathis's work.

I've put the chapter headings (70, with appendix and index) at the end of this review. The index is about 50 columns long, but not very detailed). Kemp's first volume is Europe (this includes Egypt when it was white, and parts of the middle east and Asia). His second volume deals with exploration, world empires and white mobility. Sensible enough division, but it means some aspects overlap a great deal, continuing for many centuries, so the entire book has unexpected discussions (for example, of WW2 rather early on). Probably this is helpful, since readers are made to face facts in what may be new combinations. It's ironic that white mobility is mostly a result of white inventiveness (wooden ships, iron bridges, steamships, railways, tarmac roads, motor vehicles, airscrew vehicles, jets...) and that white-invented mobility is used by Jews and their subordinates to harm white countries. Fortunately, Internet allows information to be exchanged more easily than ever before. Without Internet, even such simple generalisations as 'only white countries are targeted' would be concealed.

Kemp's 'iron law' is: ... the one true cause of the rise and fall of the world’s greatest empires—that all civilizations rise and fall according to their racial homogeneity and nothing else—a nation can survive wars, defeats, natural catastrophes, but not racial dissolution. Whether generally true or not, this was no doubt forced on his attention in Africa. He takes it very seriously, so the 'Indian Mutiny' is regarded as a consequence of the British arming Moslems in India. He has a section on Portugal, and their importation of large numbers of blacks slaves, with comments on Encyclopaedias telling lies on the Portuguese populations. (I don't think he mentions Tyndall's point on Jews in Portugal forcing Jew-white mixing). He emphasises the high proportion of blacks in the USA when it united. The entire chapter on France, he says, proves his point: there were so many wars, disasters, invasions, that France could not have survived without racial unity. His discussions on the Roman Empire, ending in a 'rabble of mongrels' may perhaps have influenced the official end of the British Empire, when the 1948 'Nationality Act' in effect gave the 'right' to come to Britain to everybody in the ex-empire, numbers vastly greater than the Romans could have imagined, and immediately used by the Jewish owners of the renamed ship Empire Windrush to bring in unasked-for immigrants.

Important note added later: Jewish policy seems to always have been to damage host populations. Kemp's 'iron law' is that racial homogeneity is the single determinant of survival of civilization.
      But if Jews and collaborators mongrelise peoples, they are making use of the 'iron law'. The obvious example is the Roman Empire, which can certainly be regarded as falling, through mongrelisation—but my point is this was probably caused by Jewish actions, including the use of money power.

      This may mean that Kemp understates the influence of ideas. He is good on Christianity, recognising doubts about Jesus, noting it was spread by force, and assessing its contributions coolly. In my view, it grew in parallel with the Jewish money system, and had such jobs as keeping the monopoly for Jews, and giving weekly instruction to the simpler types as tp who to battle, why they should pay rents, and so on. But arguably this is all really just race.
      Kemp mentions Jews, including facts about Jews in the USSR and the horrors of 'Communism'. But not Marx as a stinking rich propagandist. He mentions Mohammed's Jewish wife, but doesn't venture into the swamp of Quran revisionism or the vast slaughters of Moslems on India's north-west.
      Kemp wrote too early to take on the Jews-as-parasites idea. Jews as a form of disease, battening on to non-Jews with remorseless efficiency, so that Whites are a form of walking wounded, presented in Jew parasite evolution, is not—yet—part of the worldview of March of the Titans, but the evidence is far too strong to be ignored. He views, or viewed, Israel favourably, as a 'racially based state', but hasn't so far faced the possibility of a distributed 'race', interbreeding for crypsis, and parasitic on hosts. This is a different evolutionary path from race in the usual sense of something territorial. Gipsies, and the Thuggee cult, are less important analogies.

Kemp has a list of 'race wars'. These are between races; he doesn't count 20th century 'great wars' and race wars between whites, perhaps to avoid the obvious criticism that maybe whites weren't that bright, after all. Or perhaps they were avaricious and unscrupulous and not sufficiently gregarious.
      Kemp doesn't seem to face the fact that wars between mercenaries must ipso facto have been arranged by moneyed groups. An example is the 'Thirty Years War', an archetypically vicious and destructive war between whites in Germany, nominally religious-based. It seem Jewish ghettoes were left untouched amid the desolation, suggesting the possibility that money determined the fighting.
      Another good example is the Russo-Japanese War (1904-5), generally known to have been Rothschild-funded against the horrid Russkies.
      And another illustration is a Skype debate of mine with Jan Lamprecht, whose African background when young is rather similar to Arthur Kemp's. Trying to discuss Hitler as an agent, clearly Jan wasn't interested. He was excited by Rommel, a 'military genius' who participated in the disaster of WW2. And Jan was excited by the possibility of war, in which the usual caution about spending is replaced by the expectation of expensive military toys. He thought the Vietnamese were 'communists', as described by Jews, the Jewish media, and Jewish 'experts'. What's wrong with these people?

Thus about ten per cent of his book is explicitly about 'race wars', which of course are hidden under the present hegemony of Jews and their lies. This alone is a very refreshing change of perspective. Harry Turney-High's Primitive Warfare (1949), unmentioned by Jews according to Kevin MacDonald, perhaps might have had a similar impact.

    BUT he doesn't notice the possibility of wars WITHIN races, racial 'civil wars' if you will. Jews in the 20th century promoted Japan against Tsarist Russia in 1902. Part of a race war? However, China vs Japan, both with heavy Jewish influence, was a 'yellow civil war' with masses of deaths. The 'white civil wars' in WW1 and WW2 were about the same time.     We now seem to have in South Africa Jews arranging a black vs white war, similar to what happened in Rhodesia. This again is a sort of civil war.

    Kemp has a remarkable incapacity to see the realities of modern elections and modern employment and money. He says voters will not vote on the basis of facts. He doesn't understand that people don't want to lose their jobs, status, and homes. He doesn't understand the power of perpetual media lies. Listen to his talk on Red Ice Radio with Lana Lotkeff, for example. The fact is that race does not explain everything; economic power and other forms of power make a difference, too.

    Kemp's technique to minimise his view of Jewish power is to talk of ‘the Jewish Lobby’.   But control of the world's banking system is not a 'lobby'. Control of publishing—from 'academic' books down to porn—is not a 'lobby'. Control of world military systems and wars is not a 'lobby'. Killing millions of whites in Russia was not the action of a 'lobby'. Kemp is like someone talking of Stalin as a 'town councillor'. His entire analysis of the possible fall of Jewish power relies on non-whites disliking Jews; but what have non-whites done to expos and damage Jews? Nothing known to me.

Arthur has three chapters on events which I'd place along with other Jew-financed wars and whites taking money for violence:– White Men Cutting One Another’s Throats—the American Civil War | The First Great Brothers’ War—World War I | The Second Great Brothers’ War—World War II. Of course these are controversial, or would be if historians were more competent. Arthur tends to do a conventional chronology of battles, though he notes many puzzles on the way. The concept of world-wide Jewish power it outside his range.

Kemp's view of the stretch of non-prehistoric history includes (from a blog) these events:
1. The Battle of Nedao, 454 AD.
2. The Battle of Lechfeld 955 A.D.
3. The Battle of Kulikovo, 8 September 1380.
4. 1436. Johannes Gutenberg invents the printing press
5. The Fall of Granada, to Ferdinand and Isabella, 1492
6. Christopher Columbus sights land in the Americas, 1492
7. Siege of Vienna, 1683. Turks defeated.
8. The Battle of Navarino, 1827, '... gave birth to present-day Greece.' 9. 1948. Three American physicists invent the transistor

Kemp looks at land and sea explorations of whites: Canada, South Africa, Rhodesia, Australia, and New Zealand get a chapter each.

It has to be said that science is not a strong point with Arthur Kemp. (Chapter 59: Shaping the World—the White Technological Revolution). Kemp provides dutiful lists of scientists—all of them white, as of course is accurate—but his lists remind me of guides pointing to landmarks, and other points of interest, without explaining how they fit into human experiences. And Kemp has included Apollo 11 'moon landings' and 'nuclear weapons' in his lists of white achievements.

Arthur has an interesting chapter on the Third Reich as 'the racial state'.

It's rather saddening to reflect of the difficulties Kemp must have had with this book. It is expensive, and monochrome. I think many people simply have no idea how much money ideological Jews have handed to them. I remember talking with a head teacher who knew Gove (a 'Jew') had handed (I think) 40 million to some ridiculous bunch of superstitious primitive self-styled Jews. She had zero concept of the graveness of this atrocity. I'm sure just one tenth of that sum would supercharge Kemp's work.
      This is a challenging book. Well worth owning. It reminds me somewhat of H G Wells's Outline of History of the 1920s. I wish the book could be easily updated. Kemp is not 60 at the time of writing, and might amend it for many years. Perhaps the Kindle version (includes colour illustrations) might enable this.

---

A note on official genetics by 'Professor' Steve Jones. I'll quote without comment from The Language of the Genes which is online: '... the story of [so-called] scientific racism ... is a grim one. I have always felt a certain compassion for those whose ability to despise their fellow men is limited by he colour of their victim's skin. Genetics has—and should have—nothing to do with judgements about the value of one's fellow beings. In this sense, the biology of race has no relevance to racism, which is always happy to bend any scientific fact to its perverse sense. The genes do show that there are no separate groups within humanity. ..' Jones may not be his real name; the tens of thousands of 'Jews' who invaded 20th century Britain often changed their names; and the word 'Jew' appears nowhere in 'Jones'.

---

Contents of March of the Titans
Foreword | Prologue: Some Important Facts | 1: The First White Racial Types | 2: The First Stirrings—the Late Paleolithic Age | 3: Vast Temples and First Cities—the Neolithic Age | 4: Laying the Foundations—the Old European Civilizations | 5: Born of the Black Sea—the Indo-European Invasions | 6: To the Ends of the Earth—Lost White Migrations | 7: Inexorably Overwhelmed—Whites in the Middle East | 8: Nordic Desert Empire—Ancient Egypt | 9: Genesis of Western Thought—Classical Greece | 10: Conqueror and Creator—Alexander the Great | 11: The Age of the Caesars—Pre-Christian Rome | 12: Power and Purpose—the Glory of Rome | 13: Opponents and Allies—Rome and the Celts | 14: The Useful Foe—Rome and the Germans | 15: Racial Cauldron—Rome and the Middle East | 16: By Stealth and Steel—Christianity | 17: The First Great Race War—Attila the Hun 372–454 AD | 18: The Triumph of the Slaves—the Fall of Rome | 19: Eastern Bulwark—Byzantine | 20: The Second Great Race War—the Crusades 1095–1270 | 21: Lessons in Decline—Spain and Portugal | 22: The Third Great Race War—the Moors Invade Europe 711–1492 | 23: The Nordic Reservoir—Scandinavia | 24: The Fury of the Men of the North—the Vikings | 25: Flamboyance and Ferment—France | 26: Destiny and Destruction—Napoleon Bonaparte | 27: The Isle of Influence—England, Scotland, and Wales | 28: Civil War and Emigration—Ireland | 29: Small yet Significant—the Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg | 30: The Fourth Great Race War—Bulgars, Avars, Magyars, and Khazars 550–950 | 31: The Fifth Great Race War—Genghis Khan and the Mongols 1220–1650 | 32: Continual Conquest—the Baltic States | 33: The Test of Ethnicity—Switzerland, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia | 34: The Sixth Great Race War—the Ottoman Holocaust 1300–1919 | 35: Balkan Turmoil—Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, and Greece | 36: Risorgimento—the Resurrection of Italy after the Fall of Rome | 37: Gott Mit Uns—the Rise of Germany | 38: The Doomed Empire—Austria and Hungary | 39: The Rise and Fall of the Tsars—Russia 862–1917 | 40: Christianity Dominant—the Dark Ages | 41: The Rebirth of Classical Culture—the Renaissance | 43: White Expansion—Voyages of Discovery | 44: The Yihequan—Race War in the Far East | 45: The Sun Never Sets—the British Empire | 46: The Well of Bibighar—the British in India | 47: Conquistadors—the White Conquest of Mexico and South America | 48: Revolution! The Birth of the United States of America | 49: The Seventh Great Race War—the Amerinds | 50: The Eighth Great Race War—Mexico | 51: Three Fifths of a Person—the History of Slaves | 52: White Men Cutting One Another’s Throats—the American Civil War | 53: The Politics of Race—America until 1945 | 54: Immigration and Racial Change—the Story of Canada | 55: The White Man’s Burden—South Africa | 56: May It Be Worthy of the Name—the Story of Rhodesia | 57: The Iron Law of Demographics—the Story of Australia | 58: Murderer’s Bay—the Race War in New Zealand | 59: Shaping the World—the White Technological Revolution | 60: The First Great Brothers’ War—World War I | 61: The October Revolution—Communism in Russia | 62: The Suppressed Link—Jews and Communism | 63: The Second Great Brothers’ War—World War II | 64: The Shadow of the Ghetto—the Saga of the European Jews | 65: The Racial State—the Third Reich | 66: The End of White Supremacy—Decolonization and “Civil Rights”| 67: The Wall Falls—the Collapse of Communism | 68: The Changing Face—Nonwhite Immigration into the White Heartlands | 69: Ragnarök—the Coming Fall of the West | Postscript: The Final Call, or, What Can Be Done? | Appendices | Index

---

Review, HTML etc © Rae West 3 Sept 2018, some additions 27 April 2021

Review of Ken Livingstone's If Voting Changed Anything, They'd Abolish It.   (1987; paperback 1988)

---

Rather Nauseating Example of Post-1945 Jewish Victory Maggots Feeding

---

I have an old, used copy of Livingstone's "If Voting Changed Anything, They'd Abolish It". The cover photo shows Livingstone, resembling an extra from a PSY pop video. The blurb on the back starts 'The battle for the GLC [=Greater London Council] made Ken Livingstone a national figure, a popular hero who Londoners felt was on their side.' In fact, this was all part of the Jewish post-1945 victory, their policy being to import unwanted coloured immigrants to ruin whites—a long-term jewish object.

I think Livingstone is, or rather thinks he is, a Jew. I found a name change I think from Lebenstein in 1945 in the Official Gazette suggesting this. And the usual signs—promotion of nobody from nowhere, calling lots of people 'fascists' and 'racists' (in the first chapter, I think), going along with the Holohoax fraud, going along with the pretence that the IRA was Irish. Nothing can be taken at face value here; in any case the media will never report anything on Jews accurately. They just will not do it, until they are replaced.

Note that his book's title is a disgusting phoney in itself. The book is full of backroom meetings and plottings and campaigns and P.R. manoeuvres and money, where votes certainly did change things. All this was unreported—in fact a couple of extracts on the blurb specifically state the recording and documentation is necessary, such as it is.

The 'elite' regard immigration as a smorgasbord from which to pick delicacies. I don't think this psychology applies to people like Ken Livingstone, who are more akin to the third-rate incompetents, trusties, informers and torturers in the USSR. Livingstone is clearly indifferent to democracy, and is known to have taken orders from 'left wing' types controlled by the usual 'Marxist' suspects. He must have been picked from large number of ill-educated malcontents, and they knew what they were doing, since he did his destructive job well and apparently tirelessly. Possibly, when he was ridiculed, as a trainee teacher, by white home counties girls, he decided to take revenge. The same psychology appears to apply to quite large chunks of the Labour party—you see them at vote counts—cardiganed elderly men after lives of government makework with odd faces and mannerisms, unkempt women with thick glasses, young 'useful idiots' spouting the current line and too immature to have any idea how the line has varied in the past.

Livingstone was presumably funded; he gives no detail of his payments or his council housing, or of the scripts he worked from in radio interviews. Conceivably, this rankled with him; he made, relatively recently, a few banal observations on such things as the Haavara Agreement, though of course this may well have been just twisted Jew publicity. Khan's campaign for London Mayor included (it's claimed) some Hebrew, though I'd guess just a few phrases. Livingstone has no idea (or if he has, keeps secret) that Jews made up the Holocaust fraud to get money and influence. So far as I know, Livingstone has avoided mention of the Jewish control of central banking, which enables them to throw money at a huge variety of frauds, pressure groups, 'think tanks', newspapers and other media. There's also the twin issue of nuclear weapons and power, both of which are controlled by Jewish corporations and which are likely to be frauds, like most Jewish activity. And there are wars around the world, mostly Jewish-instigated. Livingstone's multiple ignorances and confusions have played some part in ruining the so-called 'Labour Party'. Many collaborators with Jews are low-grade people, going back all the way back to Constantine. US politicians, Giuliani, Obongo, Churchill and his Jew colleagues, thugs who stage fake demos, Mandela and black tenth rate Jew-paid scum illustrate some of the types. 'Crisis actors' and media liars have had their way paved by people like Livingstone and their shadow controllers.

It's very sad that one of the world's historically most important cities has little in the way of accessible documentary record of this important time than a mediocre hackwork, filtered and amended and no doubt reworded and obfuscated by a clutch of editors and 'researchers'.

---

Review by Rerevisionist 22 June 2017

Selected Reviews in Subject Groups:- Film, TV, DVDs, CDs, media critics | 'Holocaust' | Jews, Christians, Moslems | Race | Revisionism | Women | Bertrand Russell | Richard Dawkins | Martin Gardner  |   H G Wells

AREOYE OYEBOLA: BLACK MAN'S DILEMMA

---

Oyebola   Black Man's Dilemma.   Black Intellectual Failure after the Fake of Independence

Published 1976, reprinted 1982. The book is unindexed, often a sign of vague statements which are hard to pin down. Has a booklist, mainly by whites! including Levi-Strauss, Race and History.
      Author Nigerian, born 1936, son of a chief.

---

CONTENTS IN SOME DETAIL:
PREFACE
1 WHO IS THE BLACK MAN? [Short chapter which looks at experts and their classifications of race; starting with Linnaeus]
2 AFRICA: THE BIRTH-PLACE OF MAN [Darwin, the Leakeys, etc; and why black backwardness?]
3 BLACK MAN'S BACKWARDNESS [No black country modern/ BLACK SLAVERY/ THE BLACK MAN IS ALWAYS BEHIND OTHER RACES]
4 BLACK MAN'S NEGLIGIBLE CONTRIBUTION TO HUMAN CIVILISATION [Despite morale boosters, his look at e.g. Europe, China & readings suggest propaganda to him/ FALSE CLAIMS ON BLACK MAN'S CONTRIBUTION TO CIVILISATION]
5 BLACK MAN'S CULTURE AND CIVILISATION: MYTH AND REALITY [Intro/ GHANA/ MALI/ SONGHAI/ OTHER ANCIENT BLACK STATES IN WEST AFRICA/ ZIMBABWE/ BUNYORO-KITARA/ THE ZULUS/ CONCLUSION]
6 THE WORLD'S UNDERDOG [Always a bone of contention. Slavery, southern USA, white supremacy. Apartheid - long list of regulations. The extent of human degradation to which the black man has been subjected in South Africa has no parallel in history. - Added later. Timidity of blacks in South Africa? Namibia too. Portugal's degradation of peoples. Timid blacks in Zimbabwe?]
7 THE MYTH OF WHITE SUPERIORITY [Includes racist books as in Martin Gardner; but I think not of the 'Mongol in our Midst' type]
8 THE BLACK AMERICANS [African slaves in America; comparison of black with other Americans; Harlem, racism, protest movements, education, black power]
9 POST-INDEPENDENCE HELPLESSNESS AND NEW HOPES [Direct bondage continues/ NIGERIA AN EXAMPLE/ NIGERIA'S NEW SITUATION/ 1976 FOILED COUP/ NKRUMAH'S GHANA, GUINEA, TANZANIA AND GUYANA RAISED THE BLACK MAN'S STATUS]
10 THE BLACK MAN CAN MAKE IT [Surveys the scene: black dishonesty, imitativeness, back stabbing/ THE WAY OUT OF THE BLACK MAN'S DILEMMA/ NIGERIA'S GREAT RESPONSIBILITY [i.e. 'richest and most thickly populated black nation on earth'/ THE BLACK MAN'S DILEMMA]
BIBLIOGRAPHY

- Pp 1-3: '.. black peoples.. a candid self-examination of their past, their present and their future. It is the belief that black peoples are today leaving the substance for the shadow that prompted me to write this book.
.. I have come up with the sad discovery that the much-vaunted black man's contributions to civilisation are comparatively negligible. Africa in particular and the black world in general have contributed very little to the modern world and the enrichment of civilisation. .. we are just backward.
...
.. We must ignore the liberal white scholars who exaggerate our past contributions to civilisation. ..
.. I have come to the inescapable conclusion that factors like the black man's colonial past, the crippling effect of the slave trade on him, nature's kindness to him, his isolation, climatic conditions and neo-colonialism in the new black states of Africa, the Caribbean and South America have, to varying degrees, conditioned our intellect, our life outlook and our identity. ..
.. the black man has, for too long, looked for scapegoats for his many problems. ..'
[Note: Africa: is it hostile? on 'nature's kindness' it would be interesting to try to impartially assess technical factors [something like 'The Great Titration'], which he, clearly, [Joke: absorbing western education!], evidently has no idea about:
e.g. laterite soils, deserts, deficient soils;
shortage of ores? Fuel for smelting? Trees suitable for construction? Clay suitable for bricks?
crops [are they poor? limited? poisonous? Deficient?];
insect parasites and vectors [bilharzia? guinea worm?];
diseases [yaws? etc etc - to be fair, plague and black death seem just as much European and Asian - though this may be an artefact of course. Malaria of course has I think affected 'sickle cell' - perhaps there are mental analogies?];
things like tsetse fly and wood boring insects;
water pollution? hard to purify; eg. difficult to brew?
also lions, leopards.. poisonous snakes.. poisonous spiders;
etc....]
- 23-24: '.. of all the centres of the so-called black African civilisations I had visited - Oyo, Benin, Sokoto, Maiduguri, Ife, the ancient cities of modern Ghana, etc., I found mud walls and dilapidated buildings not in any way comparable to the solid stones and concrete buildings - the great monuments I found in Europe, Asia and the Middle East. ..
    Having visited some of these black African centres.. I have come to the conclusion that the Dutch who visited Benin City in Nigeria in the 15th Century and described it as follows were more interested in trade success and diplomatic deceit than in the reality of Africa. The Dutch visitors wrote:
    "The town (Benin) seems to be very great. .. great broad street, not paved, which seems to be seven or eight times broader than the Warmoes Street in Amsterdam...
    "The king's palace is a collection of buildings which occupies as much space as the town of Harlem, and which is enclosed with walls. .. numerous apartments for the Prince's ministers and fine galleries.. supported by wooden pillars encased with copper..
    ".. thirty main streets.. an infinity of small intersecting streets. The houses are close to one another, arranged in good order. These people are in no way inferior to the Dutch as regards cleanliness; .."
    The clownish Dutch adventurers .. must be fraudulent people who wanted to cash in on the ignorance of the people of Holland. ..
...
    Many Western liberal scholars are aware of the fact that the white countries have a lot to lose if the black man faces the reality .. if the blacks henceforth work hard to place their membership of human family on the basis of genuine equality. White experts publish books about our past glory, grandeur and achievements. They've got willing disciples among black intelligentsia who have lost the candour of any critical self-searching. [Note: myths:] They create myths about the great past of black Africa. Listen to a leading black African leader [sic] and poet, Leopold Sedar Senghor, creating a myth in 1972, on Ife-Ife, the spiritual centre for the Yorubas.. [Longish passage follows, mostly about myths, prayers, and art. [Note: French colonialism:] He was apparently brought up by the French].. I agree with Poet Senghor that it is sometimes good to have a myth, a black myth in particular. China has. Japan has. But Senghor's Ife myth and others are futile and irrelevant unless they become a source of strength. ..'
- 27ff: Malcolm X comes out with myths about blacks, says Oyebola (whose evidence however seems irritatingly shadowy: how does anyone know whether the ancient Egyptians or Sumerians were 'black' or Hamitic, which Oyebola interprets, perhaps rightly, as north African or 'white'? )
- 29ff: Dravidians in India, Egypt, Carthage
- 31-32: Ethiopia and Nubia or 'Kush', both 'remarkable African civilisations', but, he says, with hybrid populations; not 'black'.
    [His Ethiopia starts 1st C AD; not the very old one - if it existed. The Congo empire about which I noticed a book in Rhodesia seems not to be known by Oyebola.]
- 89: [France's wicked role in Nigeria's civil war]
- 111: [Interesting comparisons of Bolshevik Russia and China with black Africa: with huge efforts managed to achieve things. Also Japan which 'suffered great destruction during the Second World War'.]
- 118: More on China, and on Korean War, nuclear weapons, and Mao's mobilisation in 1954.

---

August 2019 notes

Oyebola's CV:

• Economics at University of Ibadan (1961-64)
• Post-grad programme in education (1966-67)
• [NB Biafra War 1967 - 1970]
• IPC Advanced course for journalists (1971-72)
• Official in Oyo State, Nigeria. Capital Ibadan
• Editor of Nigerian Daily Times (1972)

The blurb says Oyebola wrote on many countries, on Nigerian Universities and foreign-owned companies, and 'Frank Talk by Omoye' on Nigerian society. 'Black Man's Dilemma' has its own website on this human rights 'advocate', the book having been revised in 2002. I have not seen this edition; some readers might like to check my guesswork.
      (I Googled for more, but could only find 'Frank Talk was a political magazine established in 1984 in South Africa, and arising out of the student-led [read: Jewish anti-apartheid movement of the 1970s and 80s. He may have fathered a boxer, James Oyebola, who was shot; conceivably there may have been a political motive).

• The first point here is Oyebola's constant note of complaint; this of course is the standard Jewish technique of 'Critique'. At the present day the population is about 200 million, and 'comparable in size to Venezuela, and is about twice the size of the US state of California' to quote an Internet source. It's larger than any European country. Its population density is about the same as Germany and Italy. But of course the rate of growth is high. Many inventions by whites have been imported by Nigeria, in an erratic fashion; I doubt if the process has ever been explained convincingly. Electricity, concrete, trains, cars, airplanes, running water, types of food and medicine, printed media, electric media, computers. The constant Jewish complaints might reasonably have been opposed by Oyebola, who benefited considerably. There were also modern weapons, though whites were harmed far more by these than blacks, across the entirety of Europe from Spain to Russia. All this is missing from Oyebola, despite the fact he went to Ibadan University. It's saddening to see that from the start African 'education' was dominated by Jews.

• Oyebola's bibliography of about 100 titles are, it's obvious to me now, picked for ideological reasons, presumably (but not necessarily) by Oyebola.
      Franz Boas (2 titles), Ruth Benedict and Margaret Mead, and 'Ashley Montague' are easy to spot. We also have UNESCO publications: Juan Comas (Racial Myths), Levi-Strauss, Michael Leiris, and K S Little, on Race and on Negroes in Britain. Basil Davidson (2 titles) was another Jewish writer on Africa. There's a 1965 Encounter (a CIA front) piece by Artur Lewis. L C Dunn was another UNESCO writers.
      There are books on world-wide races. The racial basis of civilisation: A critique of the Nordic doctrine (between the wars; US book by F H Hankins) is listed. So is the 1924 book by A C Haddon The races of man and their distribution , which is descriptive of everything except achievements. And so is M J Herskovits' Man and his works: the study of cultural anthropology (1948), part of the post-1945 Jewish race-is-a-myth fantasy. But John Baker's Race (1974) is not listed. Nor is Waddington's large book. Galton's Hereditary Genius is not listed; nor are any books on IQ, I think, or hereditary weaknesses.
      There are many books on slavery, meaning blacks in the USA, though Oyebola has some idea of Arab slavers. Islam had penetrated to Nigeria by that time. I think his book pre-dates the Nation of Islam's work, which helped show that Jews ran the slave trade. Oyebola assumes slavery is bad, as of course Jews claim, though people isolated in Africa in the most primitive conditions might have found it acceptable.
      I was saddened, though not surprised, by his lightweight material on economics—he claimed a degree in economics, after all. The Pillage of the Third World by P Jale&ecuate; (1968) appears to argue with Jews. I could not find anywhere any recognition that Jews in South Africa, after the Boer Wars, got control of minerals there.

• Oyebola on Civilisations. Chapter 5 lists various supposed early African states. With no written language it's of course difficult to judge. Oyebola does record with disappointment that there must have been fraudulent promotion of Africa. (In the style of the South Sea Bubble). He doesn't seem to realise how common the analogous process is, though. For example, the idea that human life began in Africa.
      Oyebola accepts Egypt, and Sumeria, Greece, Rome have claims to civilisation, though without examining in much detail. Were pyramids, for example, worth building? And he omits the traditional Jewish mimetic and suggestible work. His ideas of great men are chaos. He praises Hannibal, if he was blackish. He praises 'Martin Luther King'. He praises Kwame Nkrumah, Julius Nyerere, Patrice Lumumba, Murtala Muhammed and Sekou Toure. He praises Mao Te Tung, Andrei Gromyko, Henry Kissinger, George Best, Ho Chi Minh, Winston Churchill.

• Oyebola's attitude to technology and science. The chapter called 'The Myth of White Superiority' has a small section on the 'electric-fan invention'. He thinks on Darwinian lines that in cold climates, uninventive people would die of cold. So surely blacks could have invented air conditioning and electric fans? It's fascinating to see the inability to understand science (and Oyebola appears to believe he talked with God, and thinks blacks are gifted with witchcraft). The long trail which led to the current understanding of electricity, including such things as electric charge, chemical generation of electricity, dynamos and fields and transmission, makes it obvious that there could never be an invention of electric fans.
      I was amused to see in the final chapter, The Black Man Can Make It, that Oyebola wants Nigeria 'to become an atomic power as soon as possible.' I won't go into the tragic absurdity of this; see nukelies.org and weep.
      Readers will be unsurprised that Oyebola has no lie detection circuitry. Chapter 8 on Black Americans (often of course mixed race) have shown 'indisputable excellence and creativity'. His list begins with Granville Woods, one of a number of fakes. I haven't found who compiled these things; I'd guess Jews and Jewish journalists. Black Inventions Myths decodes all these rather sad examples of mimicry and Jewish lies.

• Oyebola has a chapter on black Americans which shows a rather comic ignorance of Jewish activity there, such as the NAACP, forced 'integration', and the colossal expenses in such things as 'affirmative action'. '... although the blacks form 11 per cent of the United States population, they hold 15 per cent of all full-time jobs with the U.S. Federal Government. [And more, not worth quoting]. Oyebola knows nothing of media ownership and control.

• Chapter 7, 'The Myth of White Intellectual Superiority', could almost be taken from Jewish sources of the USA. Oyebola doesn't have the wit to challenge IQ tests, which are cheap pencil-and-paper assessments of such mental characteristics as can be estimated in a short time in an easily marked fashion. Oyebola quotes: One main conclusion that can be drawn from all the research and intelligence tests is that the range of mental groups is the same across all races.
      The final paragraph of Black Man's Dilemma would seem to be impossible or near-impossible: '... black nations [ought not to copy—this is the dilemma—but] find original solutions to their complex problems of indiscipline, abject poverty and poor leadership. ... Education, discipline, self-reliance and the right leadership should form the basis of such a new position of strength. ...'

Oyebola is alive, over 80, and appears to occupy a position in Nigeria analogous to elderly journalistic and media hacks in the UK and USA, looked up to without any critical examination of their work. Saddening stuff.

RW 2019-08-14

Lothrop Stoddard: The New World of Islam (1922)

Interesting Warning

---

Interesting, but not fascinating, book on Islam, much of which can be examined more clearly today.

Stoddard has little feeling for global facts and figures. In my view, Jews had a plan, put into action on 1913, to control US money and US laws. The Federal Reserve and the then-new Income Tax, then the 'Great War' and coup in Russia, were parts of this; the Second World War being the next phase. Stoddard doesn't realise that Europe's wars, sometimes regarded as civil wars, were arranged with painstaking detail. And the final result was of course deaths and devastation in Europe. Stoddard thinks Islam expanded; he doesn't see that a weakened Europe inevitably made Islam look stronger.

Stoddard treats Islam as a self-generated event; he has no idea of its connection with Jews. I've tried to explain here. The result is a strange symbiosis between the two: both exploit semi-literacy, and have similar fanatical views, for example on rape of women and sex with children. He regards Turks as fanatical fighters who were dull-witted.
      The Turkish overrunning of Asia Minor took place after the destruction of the Byzantine army in the great battle of Manzikert, a.d. 1071. The Turks captured Jerusalem in 1076. But he has no idea of crypto-Jews in the Anatolian plateau. Or for that matter in Arabia and China. Stoddard also has no idea of the massive massacres in India's northwest; he starts centuries later with the British Empire.

As with so-called 'Jews', some people count Islam as a 'race'. Obviously, with mass killings and also the use of Janissaries and large-scale wars, including in Spain and Portugal, 'race' does not apply with any rigidity. This of course is analogous to Jews: at the present time New York's Jew controllers have decided to permit full-term abortions, for which doctors have been ruled unnecessary! I suspect this may be because, as awareness of Jews has increased, it's clear that black slave women were raped by Jewish slaveholders. Stoddard seems unaware either of Jewish slaveowners, or the ruling (I don't know its dates) that males were not Jews—despite the obvious racial absurdity.

The book has nine chapters (each footnoted or endnoted). It is indexed, and has a map from north Africa, Turkey, Arabia, eastwards to the upper borders of India and China, and parts of Malaya.

RW 9 Feb 2019

Colin Flaherty video and book sites.

His site is now   https://www.colinflaherty.com   but seems increasingly to be censored. Many of his videos were copied from US local TV stations (but not clearly edited to distinguish their content from his own comments. He has made videos on riots, the 'knockout game', evasive words such as 'youths' which media owners make their staff use. He seems not to mention corrupting elements, such as Jewish media censorship and bribery of state officials and 'Federal Government' officials. Descriptive material rather than deep analysis, but a corrective from media crap.

---

Colin Flaherty   Black Violence Books and Videos

'Rerevisionist' review.

---

2020 Note: The Jewish-controlled Internet media (remember Jews control issue of money) have frantically removed large numbers of video sites, large numbers of 'social media' people and groups, and reduced search engine appearance of websites.

At present, the 'coronavirus' fraud is continuing; there must be a planned script, but none of the closely-plotting filth will say what it is.
      My Youtube channel was taken away without notice; though I imagine it's still held in Youtube. This may have been to do with Wojshit, or a similar name. You don't hate lumps of shit, but it makes sense to remove them!
      The site NewNation.org (created 1998, US site) records race crime, I think from a US South viewpoint. It looks thorough, but I doubt it includes white rapes out of USA.

Warning: a much later site newnationnews dot org (Created 2018) looks like a Jewish harm site to me. I get a Trojan warning.

---

Colin Flaherty   White Girl Bleed a Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How the Media Ignore It (2012, but apparently famous in 2013) & Don't Make the Black Kids Angry (2015)
Review Originally : 11 Feb 2015

---

No racism. No rancor. No Apologies. (But Flaherty's slogan omits 'No Jews').

Flaherty has a Youtube presence. His youtubes (he says) are e-mailed to him and consist of clips from US Jewish-controlled TV news programs, often from Fox 'News'. (Non-USA viewers must be amused at the heavily made-up actors pretending to do news). Flaherty's hit rates rarely go above a few thousand. Many readers here are aware of Jewish anti-white policies. (I'm just watching an episode of 'Midsomer Murders' showing two black 'folk singers' in an English village; and a film with an elderly actress with a deliberate working class voice being faced with a black doctor claiming to be English). The Jewish news never states that blacks have robbed, shot, stolen from, or played the 'knockout game' on whites. Flaherty makes a good case for this systematic deception: blacks are shown in Jewish-controlled media as 'relentless victims of relentless white racism practised relentlessly by relentlessly racist cops'. It applies in Jewish reports on South Africa, in Muslim sex crimes in Britain, and generally any white country. Flaherty makes a good case; some (or many—hard to know) of his fans find this new, and are shocked. Flaherty seems determined to make money from this; hence his second book, Don't Make the Black Kids Angry, which as I write is dated for publication in March 2015; easy enough to guess the contents.
    Flaherty doesn't say that Jewish control of paper money (by the 'Federal Reserve' scam) means Jews own all black cheap housing. So blacks, all their lives, pay rent to these bloodsucking parasites. Maybe he'll say that in future books, though I doubt it.
    And of course Flaherty doesn't mention violence by US mercenaries overseas.
    So—difficult situation for whites, who'd prefer not to be burdened with blacks and Jews. Flaherty plays a small part in this drama. As he said, in roughly his own words, in one of his youtube comments, in my grade I don't look at that. And the other thing he doesn't look at—US violence overseas—is conducted by Jews, too. From his websites, I notice his brother died in Vietnam in 1967. Some of these people have reunions. Flaherty has no idea of white violence and the way it's been controlled.

  Review of Jewish interest   Friedrich Engels: Communist Manifesto—Introduction by A J P Taylor

Taylor missed almost everything...., June 26, 2010.   I've added some other short extracts 30 Sept 2020.   And interpretation from Miles Mathis, 12 Feb 2021

---

I   Taylor's summary of Marx is on these lines:--

*** [1] Philosophers were puzzled by change. Hegel made this the basis of his system; ideas clashed, to produce the synthesis. He was fumbling towards the idea of evolution, but had to have an external moving force; in his case, the dialectic. However, progress—for 19th century thinkers were both self-confident and optimistic—would not continue forever, but would terminate in the Ideal.—viz. Prussia. Marx, who was a radical before he was a philosopher, accepted all this, except that he made the conflict in the actual world. In other words, dialectical materialism, ending inevitably in Utopia. This gave him the pattern for change, but not its practical expression or driving force.

*** [2] Marx's radical journalism made him an exile, in Paris. "Although it was half a century since the French Revolution, all French politics centred on it. ... nearly all the modern world stems from it, though the debt is now less acknowledged." Marx accepted the idea from Blanqui of a short, sharp revolution—like the French Revolution, with its 'days'—in spite of its un-Hegelian form. French analyses were 'class in the crudest form.' The Jacobins had lost; so now they were dismissed as petit-bourgeois, and the poor, renamed 'the proletariat', might do better. Another approach concerned the vote: the bourgeois 'appeared to have become rich through acquiring political power,' so universal franchise was the frequent call. However Marx thought property determined power—'characteristic of a legally trained mind in an orderly age. Of course property determines power if the rights of property are respected...'

*** [3] Marx still needed a driving-force; the Ideal of revolution wouldn't do. Engels, whose 'Condition of the English Working Class' was published in 1844, provided this—the search for wealth, which every economist stressed, generalised from the Lancashire cotton industry, then at the level 'say, of present-day India'.

*** [4] The subsequent story—Marx's followers and meetings, Engels' 'catechism' on communism, the composition of the manifesto with historical asides and corrections includes the printing history, literary style, selection of title, effects of 1848, summary of all four parts of the pamphlet and prefaces from 1872-1893 originally in German, Russian, English, Polish, and Italian. It's often said the manifesto is a powerful work; in fact there's a lot of dull material: absurd history ('history.. is the history of class struggles'), very limited technology finance and technology, attacks on other writers, and so on. Quite a bit of Marx, for example the Labour Theory of Value, isn't in the Manifesto, or not that I could detect.

What Taylor missed out:--

*** [5] The entire movement of science and invention is missing. Raw materials and resources were needed, and were used in increasing amounts; suppose they hadn't existed? Marx had no scientific background. He simply assumes things will expand. Taylor, being a historian, has minimal feel for this either.

*** [6] The division between developed and 'third world' economies is completely missing. Marx just assumed Europe was superior. Of course population issues don't arise with this outlook.

*** [7] The class analysis is absurdly minimal and crude. Modern societies have immense numbers of intersecting sets of people: lawyers want to maximise their gains, militarists want to expand, and the branches of the military ditto. Directors, owners, boards, financiers, shareholders, customers, unions all have different interests. Entire countries have different objectives. Civil servants form their own small groups, with their own interests. Taylor has no way to even begin tackling this.

*** [8] The whole Jewish aspect is omitted: Taylor should have known the USSR was a Jewish phenomenon; it's simply inexcusable to omit such a significant part of the puzzle.

*** [9] Taylor thinks peasant societies are the places for revolutions—because of Russia and China and possibly Vietnam. He doesn't realise that in these cases, these countries had external interference.

Whatever one's views on the Manifesto, Taylor's comments are woefully inadequate.

---

II   Some notes on Taylor, from my review of his Origins of the Second World War a book now (2020) identifiable as a post-WW2 celebration of Jewish victory, concealing all the disgusting acts of Jews worldwide.

Taylor was born in 1906, in odd circumstances, in Southport, Lancashire. Southport is a coastal town, more or less midway between Manchester to its north and Liverpool to its south, both important to the cotton industry. The Manchester Ship Canal was finished in 1893, so probably Southport, which in fact does not have much of a port, must have been somewhat isolated; it specialised in golf and holidays and Lord Street, where the cast-iron overhead shelter influenced Napoleon III and Paris.
      Online biographies of Taylor state 'His wealthy parents held strongly left-wing views, which he inherited. His parents were both pacifists who vocally opposed the First World War, and sent their son to Quaker schools as a way of protesting against the war.' His mother had at least one lover, Henry Sara 'a founding member of the Communist Party of Great Britain'. Nothing much is said about Taylor's (putative?) father. All this is consistent with his parents, or real parents, being Jewish—note for example the code words 'pacifist', 'left-wing', 'Communist', and the non-Christian school; and his accent wasn't Lancashire or Yorkshire. Family money seems to have allowed Taylor to hang around Oxford without a position. Later, Pribram and Namier, both Jewish historians, 'mentored' him. Even his biography is by a Jew (Sisman; there's another by K Burk who may or may not be). Without putting huge emphasis on all this, it is entirely consistent with Taylor's fierce anti-Germanism, and support for 'Russia', the Jewish-controlled USSR. Late in life he published a rather omissive introduction to an English translation of the Communist Manifesto—his introduction says nothing about divisions within states such as Jews exemplify; only class is considered. He was never as far as I can tell a technical Marxist—nobody intelligent can believe in the 'labour theory of value' or that 'all history is class war'. Taylor was a 'fellow traveller'—the 20th century fashion was to hush up such things.

Note that Jews have a special interest in topics such as law, history, sociology, religion, psychology, archaeology and anthropology, since they feel impulses to get in there and change things, which Americans, Britons, Germans, et al simply don't feel. All these theoretical and academic subjects have been penetrated by Jews in ways complementary to more practical activities such as Freemasonry, financial frauds and so on.

---

III   Modern Catholic source says: “All the goods on Earth were placed here by God FOR THE USE OF ALL.” By implication - the high living of Whites is due to stealing from God. So if someone makes a chair, it belongs to society and not to the maker. Christianity is in symbiosis with Jews and shares a common parasitism.

---

IV   The 'Communist Manifesto' was plagiarised from Victor Considerant of France. Various additions to 'Marxism' were made later: Lenin liked Hobson's book on 'Imperialism', which placed little blame on Jews and therefore suited Lenin's purpose; more recently, Jews in the USA have pretended to write 'Marxist' critiques of US wars and war crimes. All of this has two functions: (1) To hide the true role of Jews as much as possible; in particular, Jewish control of banks; (2) To find allies and useful idiots among the goyim host populations, either by promising them future riches, or in some cases paying them.

---

V   From A H Lane's The Alien Menace

The Communist Manifesto, written by Marx and Engels in 1847.

This Manifesto is the basis of the so called “Dictatorship of the Proletariat” in Russia to-day. These two promoters of the World Revolution concentrated upon this country [Britain] because they believed that the British Empire was the greatest obstacle to world revolution, and that their conspiracy could only succeed if and when the Empire was destroyed. This was admitted by Karl Marx, and the plan of attack was outlined in a message he sent to a meeting at Geneva in 1870 of the First International.

This message declared that:,—

---

VI   Some of the best writing and information on Jews and 'Communism' as their Jewish plot, with 'intelligence' co-operation, is by Miles Mathis. (But Miles Mathis seems to me to underestimate allies such as churches (who wanted tithes and careers) and Freemasons (who wanted financial assistance).)

marx.pdf   Real history of Marx
jenny.pdf   Marx's wife
engels.pdf   Engels
lenin.pdf   'Lenin': some real history
stalin.pdf   'Stalin' after a century of lies
nab.pdf   'Russian' Revolution
putsch.pdf   Rosa Luxemburg

---

This collection © Rae West. Uploaded 30 Sept 2020

RACES OF AFRICA by C G Seligman Professor Emeritus of Ethnology in the University of London.
First published 1930 in the 'Home University Library' Editors H A L Fisher, Gilbert Murray, and Julian Huxley.

---

C G Seligman turns out to be Charles Gabriel Seligman (1873-1940). 'Born into a middle-class Jewish family' says Wikipedia, which also says 'Since the 1960s the Hamitic hypothesis along with other theories of "race science", has become entirely discredited.' It's extraordinarily unusual for Wikipedia (set up by Jewish pornographers, it seems) to explicitly mention Jews; the reason presumably must be to push the idea of unanimous rejection by sincere thinkers. I haven't found why he was invited into the Royal Society. Wiki says he was 'chair of ethnology at the LSE' without saying why a Jewish economy outfit had an interest in races.
      It's obvious that there was a shift in attitude by Jews, probably to do with the Kalergi plan to force coloured immigration into white countries.
      His book on Africa (he made some trips from 1898. It's not of course stated whether he was funded or used by Jewish interests) is small format, with about 250 pages, with a fairly detailed index, which lacks Bible, Talmud, and Torah, which might have provided clues to his beliefs. Unusually, it indexes Jews, both the 'black Jews' and others. He even included "Jewish" nose.
The contents list is:

Most Reviews   |   Big Lies site

Selected Reviews by Subject:- Film, TV, DVDs, CDs, media critics | 'Holocaust' | Jews, Christians, Moslems | Race | Revisionism | Women | Bertrand Russell | Richard Dawkins | Martin Gardner  |   H G Wells

 

Top of Page

Review of   Christopher Booker   The Neophiliacs Might be considered an example of 'Jew Shock', the phenomenon of people with no awareness of Jews, but who nevertheless notice that something is amiss with the world. It's a difficult book to review sensibly, but my review is in my Private Eye article.

Top of Page

Review of EU   Richard North & Christopher Booker: The Great Deception: A Secret History of the European Union Single-volume history of the EU, July 11, 2010. A revised look shows it is Jew-naive, 25 June 2023 Added June 2023: I must amend this review with this later comment. I don't want to leave such a misleading review. The fact is that, like most books, the Jewish imperative for self-concealment spoils the book, missing out the true dynamics post-1945, the Jewish victory of WW2. A better approach needs to take Jews into account. The papers of hexzane527, who's French, perhaps point the way, allowing for new plans such as a third world war. So I changed the Amazon-style star rating to 3. May I recommend (though not 100% wholeheartedly) The Great Deception by Christopher Booker & Richard North. (First published 2003. New edn 2005—possibly there's a newer one by now). This book goes right back to the roots. It puts most of the blame on Monnet, who acted through various others who generally wanted, and got, the attention; the original idea coming from Salter (civil servant influenced by international control of shipping) and Monnet himself (rather shady uncreative businessman, more interested in sales and secret deals than productivity)—these two types of person seem to have established the pattern. I think there was an unconscious wartime input: de Gaulle and others were treated as governments-in-waiting or in exile, which established a pattern in which unelected groups formed shadow 'governments'. This book disentangles many myths—the sort of thing vaguely remembered from incompetent and inchoate BBC programmes. Such as the myth of the post-war carve-up—in fact the federal ideas were thought of much earlier, but one of the main arguments for federation—that it would prevent war in Europe—clearly hadn't worked. Another myth is about Britain and CAP; the French would not accept Britain unless we accepted huge sums for French farming, which of course was a bit pointless from our point of view. Britain as a slow foot-dragger was the message. Fascinating to read how the 'supranational' idea was disguised and hidden by euphemisms: the intent all along was undemocratic. There's an alphabet soup of organisations, mostly with 'E' in—Council of Europe, ESDP, EDC, EDB, EIB, EMS, etc etc. These helped kill off other approaches to Europe—supernational, free trade, etc. Booker & North don't treat the EU in isolation—world events such as Suez and Berlin and the U2 incident and nuclear issues are factored in, often with new information—Suez for example was re-arranged between Israel, UK, and France, but went wrong. Macmillan, Thatcher, Major and others are shown to have never really quite known what was happening. However, it's not a perfect book; Booker is an unrevised right-winger; I never liked him—he regards for example Dien Bien Phu as a 'disaster'. North I assume to have done much of the research (including from original documents on Internet, and recent material released under 30-year or other rule). The book doesn't mention the Soviet Union at all, incredibly, despite the model it must have provided for decades; nor Russia as a European unit; it's not too good on raw materials—e.g. oil; and north African gas which was one of the motives for inclusion of Africans in Europe. The book mentions, briefly, the CIA's funding, and Bilderberg, and Foundations such as Ford and Rockefeller, though not (yet?) Common Purpose. Briefly, though—the idea the book is full of conspiracy theories is entirely wrong. If anything, there are too few conspiracy theories—for example UKIP gets few mentions, but its failure to do anything much is widely interpreted as it's being a fraudulent party invented to waste votes. Booker and North seem not very good on law—how on earth such a system be expected to work? Their book does not disentangle exactly why the USA opposed 'communism'—if indeed it did. It has a few pages on immigration. But it's a handy and hefty one-volume reference/ source/ account. It has a twenty-page detailed index which in a book of this size is a very valuable enhancement. It is in places hard going, but the fact is, much of the analysis necessarily deals with bureaucratic language, or the language of politicians with a long tradition of evasive wording, or conventionalised phrasing designed to disguise or soften actualities. Booker & North's writing is always better than the material they have to deal with—their presentation is probably about as good as it could be. Considering the bulk of this book, it's cheap, too. I foresee and hope that as the EU starts to crack, there will be updated version(s) of this book.

Top of Page

Review of psychology of fear   Christopher Booker: Scared to Death: From BSE to Global Warming: Why Scares are Costing Us the Earth The problem is this is pure hindsight..., 5 May 2009 Booker and North are to be applauded for their collection. This includes: the 'hygiene police', passive smoking, ritual child abuse and the anal dilation test, confusions with types of asbestos, and listeria. I liked the 'speed kills' and speed cameras chapter—most accidents aren't speed related (we're told). The authors regard lead in petrol as an example of a scare; I note that Prof Bryce-Smith isn't in the index though. Their longest and penultimate chapter is on global warming. What causes me concern however is that the authors have no methodology for identifying what are, in fact, phoney claims. This is partly because they seem not to have much science background—especially Booker. But also—and here Booker might have been expected to come up with something—they have no analysis of what might drive such events. They seem to think a nucleus of scientists or writers is sufficient to generate a movement. To take an example: AIDS is well-known to have been made up by the Centers for Disease Control in the USA to give funding to virologists, because viruses hadn't been found linked to cancer and they were going to lose money. So they fastened on high-risk homosexual drug-takers who were, unsurprisingly, ill. And it worked—they made a fortune. You may disagree with my comments here—but in a way that's the whole point. Booker and North know, looking back, that the scare was just that, a scare. But could they have known in 1984? This whole book is of the 'I've heard this before' type. And provides no basis for assessing new scares—or facts—which may be invented. In all the cases they discuss, civil servants, research establishments, private companies, and journalists all have a vested interest. For example, with BSE, the killing of Britain's national herd had huge money consequences, largely of course kept quiet by New Labour's insane borrowing policies. Much of the beef trade passed I believe to the USA. So this book is valuable as a retrospective. But it's not very helpful as a contributor to intellectual self-defence.

Top of Page

Review of Political Correctness   Anthony Browne: Retreat of Reason: Political Correctness & the Corruption of Public Debate in Modern Britain Controlled Opposition.   Potshots at a camouflaged moving wrongly-defined target, 11 Jun 2009 This book is itself 'politically correct'. Browne does mention the Frankfurt School, and also, that bane of people who suppress facts about the Vietnam War, 1960s radicals. He also mentions the more or less fraudulent damaging organisations in the UK and USA—Southern Poverty Law Centre, Amnesty, Index on Censorship which now campaigns against free speech, Greenpeace which won't touch the population issue, the National Lottery. And he mentions the outrageous double standards of Asian lawyers, Asian-only housing, and other race-based groups. His most abstract analysis is that 'PC seeks to redistribute power from the powerful to the powerless.' Try telling that to whites on sink estates, or women in Islamic countries. What he doesn't point out is the fact that most PC supporters are shadowy, unknown figures. If you look for overt supporters, they're few and far between: three obscure comedians—Jeremy Hardy (who joked about people being shot in the backs of their necks), Jo Brand, and that transvestite chap trying to get into films; pop musicians—not even C list—they have to give tickets away. There are no serious writers who overtly write in favour of PC material. All the pressure is behind the scenes—fake charities, commercial media owned by foreigners who control hacks, think tanks subsidised in secret ways, trade unionists of notable intellectual lack of distinction, anonymous BBC writers of news items, groups of lawyers making money.

Top of Page

Review of British politics   Polly Toynbee: Better or Worse?: Has Labour Delivered? News, a tool of corrupted government, rehashed by hacks, to get votes, 23 Jun 2009 2005. Obviously Published to promote 'Labour'. This book is extraordinarily bad. Everything in it, from the selection of chapter heading to the content, is simply rehashed short-term 'news', itself determined by the censoring policies of civil servants, editors, the BBC, and the rest of the shambolic half-educated phonies who front for real power. There is nothing long-term, nothing wise, nothing that involves planning or allowing for remote consequences. Everything is unelected placemen (only a few years later it's hard to remember who they were), fragmentary statistics, a small standardised official vocabulary supplemented by newly made-up phrases—'liberal', '9/11', 'Taliban', 'galvanising vision', 'basic skills', 'communities', 'localism', 'devolution', 'governance', 'human rights' ... What all these things have in common is taking the official version and feeding it back to the suckers. The only amusing part is the way the authors try to liven up their rubbish, usually with mixed metaphors—there's a comic passage about snakes and ladders, based on 'Schools minister David Miliband' which is typical of the nauseating writing style. What's omitted is: let's try to list them: wider aspects of war; what was the real object? Britain's legal system: how much is arranged as a money-making scheme? Immigrant violence: why is it systematically concealed? The 'Joint Tenancy' arrangement by which immigrants, even phony asylum seekers, are housed before locals? (By John Prescott's son, for example). What about teaching—is it deliberately dumbed down? Could anybody have ever been serious about 50% attending university? Fake colleges? Why are public schools left alone despite supposed egalitarianism? What about the Bank of England? And investment in the hands of a tiny number of fund managers? Energy and power stations? Persistent residues from pesticides? Selling off of Britain's assets—and Blair's deliberate Clause 4 removal to allow this? EU and its attempt to take over? Population numbers in the third world? Support for genocide in the third world? 2008, fast forward three years, to another book by Toynbee: to quote from an Amazon review: 'suddenly Toynbee is talking about a totally different and unrecognisable country. Given that she is a famed New Labour luvvie, her indictment of modern Britain is an indictment of New Labour's record and by extension, is an indictment of Toynbee and her ilk.'

Top of Page

Review of British society   Richard Littlejohn: You Couldn't Make it Up Thatcher/Major era—interesting to compare with Bliar era, 14 Jun 2010 Collection of about 60 pieces of different lengths; dating roughly from the era when the Tories were regarded as 'sleazy' usually in the sex sense ('family values' joke, Mellor &c), and corrupt in the money sense—MP company interests, monopolist utility companies with billion profits, share options, ministers taking jobs in ex-public companies they'd invented. Fascinating to compare with today's situation though the wars today compared with those around USSR breakup seem larger and perhaps worse. There's material on Europe, including ex-chancellor Lamont saying there was no benefit whatever to Britain that he knew of. Also perhaps especially pieces on the genesis of social engineering frauds—he mentions eg Rowntree foundation reports and has several pieces (p83 on inventing conferences and syndromes, p93 inventing a new pressure group, p187 on lawyer-driven litigation, p125 one parent families, etc.) In some sense he's a bit naive—remember the dead 'defence' MP with a satsuma in his mouth? [109-111—Steven Milligan]—Littlejohn doesn't realise the trappings were probably a distraction. (This trait continues today—he's naive about Jewish influences for example. He has no sense of huge military interests. He accepts the 9/11 story at face value. All the material is unsourced—which of course is typical of the entire media spectrum, so one can't be too harsh. But some of the one-legged lesbian collective stories of this era were, apparently, made up. However as part of the momentum which eventually led to Bliar (this was a popular nickname for Tony Blair) being elected—and will no doubt result in Labour being removed—it's a fascinating though rather depressing collection. He does have a collection of traditional beliefs, on, say WW2 but not WW1; and top atrocities of all time; but these are so common that criticism is on another plane. Whatever you are told, these are not 'rants'.

Top of Page


Top of Page


Top of Page

Top of Page

Review of social speculation futurology   Michael Young: The Rise of the Meritocracy Educational tokenism ... the origin of fraudulent state-funded pseudo-research, 9 July 2009 This book is usually described as a 'satire'. I don't believe it is—the word 'satire' was popularised at about the time this book was issued in paperback, and the blurb-writers must have thought it was the best available word to fit this odd work. 'Satire' has the great advantage that any mistakes can be ascribed to satirical intent. Several very striking things: [1] Young is not very well educated, and has astonishingly little curiosity; he is agonisingly conventional within the framework of the 'Labour Party' of the time. The mid-1950s saw among other things the supposed invention of the H bomb; concern about population growth, or 'explosion' (except for Jews); plans for new towns, motorways, cheap cars, airports and other oil-related novelties; television; the feeling that Europe ought to be unified. There is absolutely nothing whatever of this in Young. Young (like C P Snow) called the Second World War 'the Hitler War'. Young's belief about the 'British genius' was that is put 'new beer into old bottles'. His entire sphere is a narrow type of educational politics. He was reported as having drafted, or read, or otherwise helped with, the 1945 Labour manifesto; they thought they'd lose, but when it became clear they were popular, Young said they "thought, my God, we might have to put this into practice! So they started to worry about the manifesto." [2] 'The Rise of the Meritocracy' is almost entirely concerned with education. I don't think there's a single page without some mention of formal education: schools, comprehensive schools, primary schools, the young, the stupid, the 'able', the clever, the brilliant, residential nurseries, class sizes, grammar schools, science teachers, public schools, early developers, late developers, Wykehamists, Rugbeians and Carthusians, mental labour, manual labour, higher education, and, particularly, I.Q.s. It's difficult to know what Young thought of IQ; I can't believe he would have measured very highly, and therefore, on the same principle as in Liam Hudson's books, I doubt he liked them much. On the other hand, they fit in with his tokenistic outlook to education. As far as Young is concerned, anyone who went to Oxbridge must have a first-class mind; Young lacks any scientific curiosity, and the idea of checking to see whether hothouse education, where there are officially correct answers, does in fact lead to competence, is completely lacking. He does mention people like Bevin (son of a farm labourer) who he compares with a mythical Lord Wiffen; however he naturally has no way to assess Bevin—was he, in fact, any good? Young unconsciously sees Bevin: a Cabinet Minister, with money. Can't be bad, eh! His attitude to the Civil Service is the same. In fact Young himself became Lord Young of Dartington—the Dartington referring to the experimental school in Devon he'd attended. There are a few bits of realism here and there, invariably I think taken from other people. Dates of Education Acts as a reaction to wars: after the Boer War, First and Second World Wars. The Institute of Management's selection processes and the 'Pioneer Corps' during the war get some comment, as fitting square pegs into square holes, even if the pegs are resentful. Beatrice Webb gets a footnote on the inadequacies of ordinary people. A 'Labour' Party man is quoted as saying he knows no 'Labour' party members who don't sent their children to public schools. (For US readers, these are schools where people pay). A Civil servant is quoted on replies to Parliamentary questions—ideally they reveal nothing. Young helped found Which?—the Consumers Association. He had something to do with the Open University. 'From 1965-8 he was Chairman of the Social Science Research Council.' (Latter quoted from a Penguin blurb). It is impossible to be certain how seriously this 'essay' was put forward as satire. but the overwhelming impression is of Young as intellectually entirely 'safe', unwilling to risk an investigation into any important topic. If Young has left a legacy, it is of countless 'Labour' quangoes, 'think tanks', pressure groups, phoney charities, university departments, professoriats arranging their own successors, institutes, 'trusts', 'research' groups, union organisations, all dishonest, all taking public money in tacit exchange for avoiding genuine statistical, economic, legal, and sociological investigation.

Top of Page

---

HTML and all content ©Rae West. Except cartoon by Saboteur365. This file from my Race-related book reviews was first collected together and uploaded 29 July 2018. Please note the classifications are somewhat a matter of opinion. Reviews and updates added subsequently as dated.