Nuclear weapons do not exist - TVOW's Youtube script

Nuclear, military & science films - newsreels, TV, DVDs, videos, Youtubes - photos & images & pictures

Re: Nuclear weapons do not exist.

Postby NUKELIES » 14 Apr 2011 14:54

TVOW wrote:The test footage is purely for propaganda purposes it has nothing really to do with the science that may or ,may not have been going on.


TVOW your "nuclear bombs don't exist but they do" spin campaign is not working.
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: Nuclear weapons do not exist - TVOW's Youtube script

Postby TVOW » 14 Apr 2011 16:30

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Last edited by TVOW on 15 Apr 2011 12:24, edited 1 time in total.
TVOW
 
Posts: 59
Joined: 21 Mar 2011 21:30

Re: Nuclear weapons do not exist - TVOW's Youtube script

Post
by mooninquirer » 14 Apr 2011 20:12

TVOW ---- why do you bring up HAARP or those other weapons ? That is going in the opposite direction. I do NOT think the government can control the weather with HAARP ---- that is giving the gov't too much God-like power. Really, it is the same thing as nuke bombs. I wouldn't be surprised if the CIA or the CFR with Rockefeller and the Rothschilds, are financing people to espouse theories about HAARP.

mooninquirer
 

Re: Nuclear weapons do not exist - TVOW's Youtube script

Postby TVOW » 15 Apr 2011 00:06

Iaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Last edited by TVOW on 15 Apr 2011 10:24, edited 1 time in total.
TVOW
 
Posts: 59
Joined: 21 Mar 2011 21:30

Re: Nuclear weapons do not exist - TVOW's Youtube script

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 15 Apr 2011 01:19

TVOW wrote: but the truth is the majority of the elite are far from psychopaths and even those that our have at least some rationalization for their behaviour.


Now you are dealing in pure fantasy.
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Re: Nuclear weapons do not exist - TVOW's Youtube script

Postby NUKELIES » 15 Apr 2011 01:28

TVOW wrote:Ok Jesse secret nuclear weapons everywhere, of course , you have seen through my campaign on what 6 people with my evil cunning plan to tell people that they do exist by telling them they don’t. Well Done


It would appear Edmund Matthews that you are trying to handle us with obfuscation. You state repeatedly that nuclear bombs exist but we are only exposed to false evidence of their existence. This is obfuscation.

mooninquirer wrote:I do NOT think the government can control the weather with HAARP ---- that is giving the gov't too much God-like power.


Mooninquirer I agree wholeheartedly and I'm glad to see someone else write the same. All this talk about government caused earthquakes is nonsense.
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: Nuclear weapons do not exist - TVOW's Youtube script

Postby NUKELIES » 15 Apr 2011 12:28

TVOW wrote:Oooww big word


Obfuscation is a common word Edmund. It describes what spin doctors do. If you are not spinning, then post logical postulations rather than semi-incoherent grammatically incorrect mispelled wanderings which must always appear as spin. Your creativity will add to the discovery of the Truth we are discerning if you allow it to be rational. Big words are okay here Edmund, we make no claim to be educated, we are just trying our best in our attempt to communicate our core message that we think nuclear bombs may be a hoax.

For your reference and a quick lesson in the art of spin doctoring, check out rense [dot] com where you will see some truth mixed in with stories of Bigfoot and UFOs and lizard people.
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: Nuclear weapons do not exist - TVOW's Youtube script

Postby TVOW » 15 Apr 2011 12:41

NUKELIES wrote:
TVOW wrote:Oooww big word


Obfuscation is a common word Edmund. It describes what spin doctors do. If you are not spinning, then post logical postulations rather than semi-incoherent grammatically incorrect mispelled wanderings which must always appear as spin. Your creativity will add to the discovery of the Truth we are discerning if you allow it to be rational. Big words are okay here Edmund, we make no claim to be educated, we are just trying our best in our attempt to communicate our core message that we think nuclear bombs may be a hoax.

For you reference and a quick lesson in the art of spin doctoring, check out rense [dot] com where you will see some truth mixed in with stories of Bigfoot and UFOs and lizard people.



"we think nuclear bombs may be a hoax".

Now who is sitting on the fence , good luck Jesse , I look forward to your documentary , make it good one ,o and I eat Lizard men for breakfast ,so Jeff Rence doesn’t worry me.
TVOW
 
Posts: 59
Joined: 21 Mar 2011 21:30

Re: Nuclear weapons do not exist - TVOW's Youtube script

Postby NUKELIES » 15 Apr 2011 15:17

TVOW wrote:good luck Jesse , I look forward to your documentary


There you reveal another method of yours with which you attempt to discredit the series of bomb hoax videos which rerevisionist and I have already put together. Together they already form a reasonable argument to which we continue to add. Rather than claiming inadequacies in my videos, perhaps you might make a coherent video of your own.

Good luck to you!

TVOW wrote:Now who is sitting on the fence


Touche Edmund. Nuclear bombs do not exist. Do you seek to be the dissident among dissidents?

By the way TVOW - do you know anything about Common Purpose?
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: Nuclear weapons do not exist - TVOW's Youtube script

Post
by mooninquirer » 16 Apr 2011 03:17

TVOW ---- you cannot just use the snob appeal argument that Jesse and FirstClasSkeptic are not qualified in physics, because a well-regarded saying in physics is "you do not really know a theory in physics unless you can explain it to a barmaid." ( which is why I chose my avatar picture ). In other words, you have to explain it to the average person who is curious about it. This saying also captures the notion that the explanation should be engaging and fun for both parties. Physicists and other science teachers are drawn to their discipline by a quest for a truth about the world that is out there. They are often very evangelical about their desire to share the excitement of their discovery or understanding of the universe with other people.

A number of scientists doubted that nuke bombs bombs would work. Werner Heisenberg was surprised to hear that a nuke bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. Enrico Fermi doubted that hydrogen bombs would work. And there is even Einstein. Although the Jewish media have exaggerated Einstein's greatness, and he plagiarized his work on relativity, he was not a total idiot about science, either. And although he wrote the letter to FDR to start the Manhattan Project ( at the urging of Leo Szilard ), apparently Einstein was not willing to engage in too much alarmism, as I am sure Leo Szilard would have wanted to, nor falsely claim that he believed with certainty that nuke bombs will become a reality. The exact wording of Einstein's letter presents a HUGE problem for the propagandists of nuke bombs. In my college course "Nuclear Arms: An Interdisciplinary Framework For Decision Making" the Jewish physics professor really took great pains to explain away Einstein's skepticism that nuke bombs would even work, saying that Einstein was involved in a totally different branch of physics.

This is what Einstein said in his letter ( look it up ! ) : ".... it is conceivable --- though much less certain --- that extremely powerful bombs of a new type may be thus constructed. A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by air."

I think Einstein was aware of the slow neutron problem. That the year prior to this letter, Enrico Fermi won the Nobel Prize for physics, whereby it specifically stated on his citation "slow neutrons." Thus, any type of chain reaction would have to have a moderator to slow down the neutrons which are necessarily always fast, that are a product of fission. Thus, the nuke bomb would have to be something like a nuke reactor, which is necessarily something bulky. Also, Einstein knew of the enormous spacing between nuclei, and that the critical mass would have to be HUGE to accommodate this.

Here are a few quotes from physicists, about the importance of the average person understanding physics, and the burden of explanation being upon the scientist. I took them from the book, "The Dancing Wu Li Masters," by Gary Zukov ---- which, incidentally, mentions neither the moon landing, nor nuclear bombs, even though modern physics is extensively discussed :

"Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in plain language comprehensible to everyone." ----- Albert Einstein

"Even for the physicist the description in plain language will be a criterion of the degree of understanding that has been reached." ----- Werner Heisenberg

"If you cannot --- in the long run --- tell everyone what you have been doing, then your doing has been worthless." ----- Erwin Schodinger

mooninquirer
 

Re: Nuclear weapons do not exist - TVOW's Youtube script

Postby TVOW » 16 Apr 2011 10:32

This will be my last post as you people cant be trusted to not edit and misquote my posts.
I said none of us are qualified ,this includes me and clearly Einstein considered himself in the same category , I know all about his letter thank you . Build all the straw men against me you like , god remains the arbiter of whether it is possible or not, not I nor you
TVOW
 
Posts: 59
Joined: 21 Mar 2011 21:30

Re: Nuclear weapons do not exist - TVOW's Youtube script

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 16 Apr 2011 15:08

NUKELIES wrote:
TVOW wrote:Oooww big word


Obfuscation is a common word Edmund.


The physics professor at my college had a carved wooded sign on his office wall that said, "Eschew Obfuscation".
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Return to Movies, Stills, Soundtracks: Check the Media Yourself, for Fakes & Lies!


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest