My father once told me that during his travels in Baghdad in the late 1960s he noticed that homosexual activity was rampant among young Muslim men, which apparently served as a release valve for communal sexual tension caused by the sadistic oppression of women, and because many men could not afford to marry. This is the primary function I believe homosexual activity has always served.
I spent a month in Moradabad on my trip to India last year. On the crowded busy streets I noticed a group of three or four eunuchs walking around. They were obviously men wearing saris. I enquired about them to the taxi driver or someone, and was told that they are venerated in Hinduism and they are sort of holy beggars - it is bad luck not to give them money. There is a character in the Mahabharata named Shikhandi. He/she is used as a ruse and a trick by Arjuna to deal the death blow to the Pandavas.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shikhandi
In the battle of Kurukshetra, Bhishma recognised him [Shikhandi] as Amba reborn, and not wanting to fight 'a woman', lowered his weapons. Knowing that Bhishma would react thus to Shikhandi, Arjuna hid behind Shikhandi and attacked Bhishma with a devastating volley of arrows. Thus, only with Shikhandi's help could Arjuna deal a death blow to Bhishma, who had been virtually invincible until then.
Here's an interesting connection to nukes: J. Robert Oppenheimer famously cited the Mahabharata as justification for "atomic" warfare. Perhaps the eugenicists-that-be also employ the sexual tactics of the Mahabharata - which is actually a war manual - against Western goyim. Perhaps the whole gender-bending agenda is being used as a trick to get us to drop our weapons like Shikhandi was used as a trick by Arjuna to get King Drupada to lower his weapons. There is a natural social order inherent to humanity - it is not puritan and generally seems to tolerate cross-dressing and homosexual activity as a testosterone release mechanism - but it is healthiest when men can be men, and women can be women, and the economy is set up in a way that allows husbands to support their wives. The current state of things in the Anglosphere and much of Europe is such that two full-time workers of any gender can barely afford to pay their mortgage and buy food. In the UK it's even worse due to criminally expensive utility price gouging. How are we supposed to have a functional sexual dimorphism when we can't afford one?
- Gays.jpg (25.05 KiB) Viewed 94 times
What happened in the 20th century is that the eugenicist social programmers succeeded at subverting the normal social order of the West by brainwashing women into thinking that they needed to smoke cigarettes and act like nasty bitches in order to qualify as feminists - the new men; and by convincing men that there was a new category called "Gay" that they could pigeon-hole (and perhaps cornhole
) themselves into if they were at all academic or creative and perhaps disinclined to become manual labourers.
