[rerevisionist]

I just noticed that the BBC made a series on Oppenheimer, by someone called Peter Goodchild - a '7 part serial, shown on BBC2 in the UK in 1980'. The BBC website has no mention of this - maybe it was too dull? - but Amazon reveals it's out on DVD. (Below the routine reviews which award 5 stars, there's a single one star review by someone who hated it). Searching the BBC does reveal other Oppenheimers - Broadcast 21st August 2000 LEGACY OF HARRY OPPENHEIMER REMEMBERED For 27 years he was the boss of the world's biggest gold and… but the link is broken! I believe another is the very pro-immigration 'Labour' MP, Margaret Hodge (real name I believe Oppenheimer), married to a judge who likes releasing non-British criminals.

Anyway searching off the BBC site shows up a 1980 'New Scientist' review of the BBC series 'Oppenheimer'. The scriptwriter is credited as someone called Peter Prince. There's an online book promotion by Prince disguised as journalism, in the Guardian - newspaper funded by a private trust to promote the Jewish agenda. (Incidentally the BBC out some effort put into 'recreating' the conditions of the 'nuclear test'. It would not surprise me if some online stills were taken from the film, on the same principle as bits of Schindler's List being presented as though factual.)

... Anyway. Peter Goodchild is listed on Amazon as the author of J. Robert Oppenheimer: Shatterer of Worlds (1980), something of a book tie-in. Goodchild spoke to Teller and others (One can visualise Teller vetting him for gullibility). Goodchild also published Edward Teller: the Real Dr Strangelove in 2004 - just after Teller died; maybe there was material Teller didn't want printed. I haven't read this book, but would be 100% certain that, since it's by a BBC apparatchik, it will be gullible and conventional; if there is material Teller disliked, it would be trivial and personal.

[The Einstein point really is the absence of fictional and 'documentary' treatment. Is it possible that he couldn't be presented without damaging the mythology? Much of his time in the US was spent in amateur music quartets or just hanging out in Long Island. In Europe, it would be difficult to present his supposed breakthrough papers in any convincing way, since they appeared to spring from nowhere, whilst also having many antecedent papers suggesting suspiciously plagiarism-like behaviour. Even his supposed pacifism is unconvincing as he supported his 'brethren' unreservedly. Well, also he didn't speak English - there's a newsreel interview of him being asked on arrival in New York on a ship, what do you think of prohibition; he replied in German, but you see, I don't drink - a disappointing reply from someone supposedly intelligent.]

[rerevisionist]

Same family??
Investigation Results into Oppenheimer Fund Fraud
https://www.oppenheimerfundfraud.com/id3.html

[FirstClassSkeptic]

IF it's not the same family, I"ll bet it's the same tribe.