'Nuclear weapons maintenance' by pimply faced kids

Manhattan Project, 'atom bomb', Cold War, spies, 'H-bomb', missile projects, 'neutron bomb', Vanunu, WMD lies

Supposed 'Nuclear weapons maintenance' by pimply faced kids

Postby rerevisionist » 05 Mar 2012 15:29

INSERTED by rerev 1st May 2015
biggles4441 commenting on 'THE LORD OF THE NUKES - Nuclear Bombs, Power, frauds - 1st edn' in Youtube c. 27 April 2015
if you look at how "small" nukes have become in a very short space of time its unbelievable..i rember guarding alleged "nukes" in the 80,s whilst in the airforce,they were about 10 ft long and 4ft wide....they were also armed by an armourer using akeyfob which he carried in his pocket...all this info is on the net to see otherwise ide think i was dreaming it lol they also had a switch saying "low yeild or high yield" i hope nukelies reads this and checks it out
and if you look at the MERV system on trident it stinks these independent warheads which are about 3ft by 4ft can find individule targets all over the world...as penn and teller say BULLSHIT
[quoted exactly as written; it looks another fake to me]
From Excop95
It is highly probable that this nuke stuff is indeed, a hoax. Being a former USAF Security Specialist I was around said nukes on a daily basis. Now these devices needed regular maintenance, like changing the oil in your car. The folks that did this were not nuclear physicists. They were pimply faced kids from the Munitions Maintenance Squadron. After a few months of Tech School you got to work on the most destructive weapons known to man? I think not. I? would watch these guys tinker with these b... [he probably ran out of space]


Above comment posted to my Youtube NUKE LIES Fake USA 'nuclear bomb test' 1955 - NO NUCLEAR ARMAGEDDON
(Bible reference in the hope of catching funadamentalists searching on nukes)


'Excop95' posted his comment round end Jan/ start of Feb 2012. I asked him to comment further, if he wants. It might be intteresting to know what the 'maintenance' consisted of, apart from signing some sort of document for payment.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: 'Nuclear weapons maintenance' by pimply faced kids

Postby rerevisionist » 06 Mar 2012 03:17

Excop replied--
there will be nothing online or anywhere else concerning MMS (munitions maintenance squadron) as it is highly classified stuff. Those guys have a Secret Clearance (as? I did) and get debriefed upon discharge-cannot discuss the particulars of their job once released from active duty.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: 'Nuclear weapons maintenance' by pimply faced kids

Postby NUKELIES » 06 Mar 2012 13:09

That's an excellent post! Another chink in the armour.
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: 'Nuclear weapons maintenance' by pimply faced kids

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 06 Mar 2012 17:24

But will this guy start out saying, "I have my doubts", and then end up being a nuke believer, like Lark in the submarines? I think it's a method.
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Re: 'Nuclear weapons maintenance' by pimply faced kids

Postby NUKELIES » 06 Mar 2012 23:41

FirstClassSkeptic wrote:But will this guy start out saying, "I have my doubts", and then end up being a nuke believer, like Lark in the submarines? I think it's a method.


Could be. I hate it when people put forth that paltry spin that "nukes exist even though the footage is faked." While logically possible, it is also logically improbable.
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: 'Nuclear weapons maintenance' by pimply faced kids

Postby rerevisionist » 07 Mar 2012 19:46

NUKELIES said
I hate it when people put forth that paltry spin that "nukes exist even though the footage is faked." While logically possible, it is also logically improbable.

If they did finally get the things to work, say in the 1970s, they would have had to test them. So, where are the more recent, undoubtedly genuine nuclear tests? Nowhere. Would they have kept them secret? It seems unlikely, since they would be genuine evidence of the boasted military power. This is why I think they never worked, and still don't.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Return to Nuke Scams Past: Nuclear Plans & Conspiracies & Funds, Wars, Hoax Maintenance


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest