** ADDED LATER *** If you email it to me (or others - NUKELIES for example) it could make the soundtrack of a video, for Youtube. 30 mins would be exactly two videos - I lost my concession to have long videos because of a fake copyright claim - but NUKELIES could probably do the full half hour as one video.
Yes, maybe Randi's lot are just vain, rather than hired types. Who knows. But some of them have a few tens of thousands of postings, which must take time, even if they say nothing much.
The thread was moved from Science to Conspiracy Theories. Sigh. It doesn't seem to appear on the front page, which is annoying. Another thing - which I've noticed before - is that insults from them don't get moderated; if I say the same back, I do.
Junk reply on 'JREF' that amused me ---
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,165 [Note: 7 messages every day on 'JREF']
Originally Posted by Rerevisionist@Craig4 - it's touching that you have so much humanitarian concern, though I can't help noticing that the Vietnamese, who were butchered in large numbers by the USA get no mention from you.
Now, first, if you look at that single photo (note there are no serious photos from the ground taken by Japanese people, despite the fact they had photographic equipment in 1945 and would be likely to film a strange new phenomenon) -- as I say, if you look, you'll find it's not a single mushroom cloud. In fact, it's two separate columns of smoke, I'd guess from two separate bombed towns.
If you check on the other material, you'll find it does not carry the message supposedly given to it. For example there's supposed to be a shadow of a person on a wall. But at the time the atom bomb supposedly dropped, Hiroshima would have been alive with people. Why should there be just one shadow? How come - and there's a book extract I scanned in - an eyewitness said she lived 600 yards from the epicentre; when she opened the door to see what was going on, there were burning wooden buildings - there was no wiped clean irradiated hot surface. And so on.
Why would you expect I would mention the deaths in other wars when there's nothing in the OP mentioning the deaths from conventional wars? [You're following the convention of pretend concern over supposed atom bomb deaths. This is pure hypocrisy as tens of millions died in WW2].
Your other concerns don't merit consideration. [I've put the other concerns - just a subset of the evidence- in blue]
You have to laugh at this clown, who doesn't merit consideration.
Another junk reply on 'JREF' illustrating the violence never far below the surface of these Jewish-controlled freaks' mentalities: ---
Yesterday, 05:05 PM #54
Sword_Of_Truth Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 10,250Originally Posted by Rerevisionist
I won't say any more here, but I would ask serious commentators, if there are any on this site, to have a look!
I have done volunteer work as a member of the Canadian Nuclear Society. Mostly public education related stuff, like manning booths at science teacher conventions, doing displays and presentations on nuclear energy. I am not a nuclear physicists or engineer, but I am on a first name basis with the top minds in civilian large scale nuclear power generation in North America.
In my almost professional opinion, and I speak for myself here, not the CNS, the people behind the "Nuke Lies" forum should probably be forcibly sterilized to save future generations the emotional burden of knowing that kind of stupid exists in the world.