[Cowan Bellarmino]

^ What you're describing is gnosticism, practiced by John Dee, then the Knights Templar and on through Crowley, etc. Kabbalists have had those beliefs for centuries - the conjuction of opposites (black and white, male and female), ruled over by the androgyne.

[NUKELIES]

^ What you're describing is gnosticism, practiced by John Dee, then the Knights Templar and on through Crowley, etc. Kabbalists have had those beliefs for centuries - the conjuction of opposites (black and white, male and female), ruled over by the androgyne.

Tessellation is hermaphroditic allegory. It all does seem to stem from Akhenaten. If there was someone before him then they have likely been forgotten / erased by the sands of time.

[Exorcist]

The difference is the Jews are right on one thing, they are god chosen,

They are not.

they are part of jehova, they are an aspect of him, they do his will,

They do not.

and his will is a colony of humans as sheep,

It isn't.

it's clear on all "religions" which are the same,

They are not the same.

Monotheist books state it perfectly clear, sheep and religious overlords.

Quotation please! Nowhere in the NT does Jesus say this.

You won't understand world government without it..

I understand perfectly the type of world government Talmudic Jews seek but it will not stand.

On an unconscious level many of us oppose it,

Wrong! On a conscious level we oppose it.

but we are opposing (a part of) god's plan, his creation organized with his chosen people at top.

That is Satan's plan not God's plan and Talmudic Jews are not God's chosen. Also "fake Jew Kazars" are not Jews.

Gypsies were another chosen race fallen into disgrace, arrogant racist thieves but without "higher" support, therefore ending in "small" operations, junk, unlike the Jews who end in banking for example.

Will you please provide a quote from one of your "Monotheist books" to substantiate this.....lol.

Celtic druids (which were not Celts but a foreign ruling tyranny) were the creators of modern Christianity, in the sense of official books and cathedrals, they wrote most "Eastern" and "Greek language" books, epistles and spread them around, but Jean Hardouin in the XVIII and Edwin Johnson in the XIX showed the monasteries where they cooked them.

Jean Hardouin was a Jesuit. For Jesuit read "crypto Talmudic saboteur of Christianity".

They "converted" to Christianity, actually they took over the Church and use the Normans/French and Celtic tribes to invade/Christianize Europe. They had it easy to control / hypnotize Celts tribes. That's why the British Isles were their preferred base of operations, they had been working on the mind/genetics of Anglo-Saxons for a long time, liberalism, modern "economics", piracy, divide and conquer, modern propaganda (WW1 British style lies), lack of honor (Wilson 14 points). They masquerade behind the once decent and close race of Celts and Anglo-Saxons as stepping stone to subdue the world, .

What you have stated above is complete bullshit. Evidence please for Druid work on mind/genetics, liberalism, piracy, hypnosis, modern economics, modern propaganda and lack of honour or is that hidden in a secret esoteric vault?..

If only Hitler had listened to the Spaniards, who knew the British well, instead of the Italians and Germans, who had no experience with them!

The "British" Government at the outbreak of WWII, unbeknown to the British people, was under the covert control of ZOG (UK Branch). Read David Irving's "Churchills War".

The Christian "God" is Satan.

Christ is not Satan. Attribution please......

[Sorensen731]

The difference is the Jews are right on one thing, they are god chosen,

They are not.

I wrote god in small letters, I mean the Old Testament god, who is not the only nor the most powerful, he's just the creator of the material world, where we are, but our spirits don't come from him but from outside, so, your and mine God can't be jehova.

they are part of jehova, they are an aspect of him, they do his will,

They do not.

They are the 10th Sephiroth Malkouth, the Kingdom, a reflection of 1st Sephiroth Kether, the Crown. It's in their own books.

and his will is a colony of humans as sheep,

It isn't.

If we are referring to jehova/yahwe the god of jews and the Old Testament yes, and in some interpretations of the N.T also, it depends how you look at it, there were two opposing views, the jews(materialistic, jealous) won most of the time, so we only have few good passages and lots of "apocrypha" were destroyed.
Some realize the creator of this world can't be god, a good god, or a perfect one, there has to be something else above, and he is jealous and tries to stop any contact or talk about it.

it's clear on all "religions" which are the same,

They are not the same.

Depends on how we judge. If the question is;
What do they say about the world?
Is it a good creation or an evil one?
Do we come from this creator or not?
The same creator who only achieved monkeys suddenly became wiser and managed to create us?

In regard to this questions, most religions say the same, with different names, Brahma, Alah, God

Religion is about all, about existence, but all the allowed religions are "controlled opposition" I would say, all say this world is good and not a hell or a prison and the creator is a good being.
As in "democracy" you can choose the same shit. The radical ones, which stated the obvious truth were made illegal centuries ago.
You could call religion a meta-politics;
Religion= Why are we here? What is here? What is us?
Politics = we, us, are here, how do we organize ourselves?

Monotheist books state it perfectly clear, sheep and religious overlords.

Quotation please! Nowhere in the NT does Jesus say this.

Really? I'm tempted to count how many times "sheep" appear in King James Bible, done, 196 times. (And flock 186 times)

On an unconscious level many of us oppose it,

Wrong! On a conscious level we oppose it.

Haha! Good, good!

but we are opposing (a part of) god's plan, his creation organized with his chosen people at top.

That is Satan's plan not God's plan and Talmudic Jews are not God's chosen.

Here we understand each other. Satan is the Vatican God, the O.T, this is Satan creation, all you see with your senses, behind the story of Christ is a foreigner who came to wake the people, but the rulers managed to hide his words and gave us the absurd contradictory N.T.

This is how it was made;
The first humans here remember their original world, paradise, and didn't like this one. They considered this hell.
So the keeper of this world and his minions, said hell is something different, fire underneath.
And paradise was.. made by the same entity who created bugs and illness...and it was perfect! But men ruined it! Your fault!
And Satan wasn't the creator of the material world, no, Satan was..someone else! Who is responsible for the bad things!
And the good God they remember, of immortal beings free of fear, illness or death or any need at all...was taken over by Satan, who created perfect things but....in a galaxy far, far away...in another time...so, no proof, and it was your fault, your sin that that paradise was lost! When the original sin was the treason/accident of ending trapped as spirits in this world, attached, crucified to time, needs, and death.
If they lie about what happened 70 years ago...how much could they lie to hide the more important question of our origins?

Gypsies were another chosen race fallen into disgrace, arrogant racist thieves but without "higher" support, therefore ending in "small" operations, junk, unlike the Jews who end in banking for example.

Will you please provide a quote from one of your "Monotheist books" to substantiate this.....lol.

I think it's obvious.

Celtic druids (which were not Celts but a foreign ruling tyranny) were the creators of modern Christianity, in the sense of official books and cathedrals, they wrote most "Eastern" and "Greek language" books, epistles and spread them around, but Jean Hardouin in the XVIII and Edwin Johnson in the XIX showed the monasteries where they cooked them.

Jean Hardouin was a Jesuit. For Jesuit read "crypto Talmudic saboteur of Christianity".

I know, unless he was double-agent or aware of the fraud, his fanaticism in protecting the perfect faith was the reason for his book.
There were battles between the sects in power, as Stalin purges, "family" discussions.

They "converted" to Christianity, actually they took over the Church and use the Normans/French and Celtic tribes to invade/Christianize Europe. They had it easy to control / hypnotize Celts tribes. That's why the British Isles were their preferred base of operations, they had been working on the mind/genetics of Anglo-Saxons for a long time, liberalism, modern "economics", piracy, divide and conquer, modern propaganda (WW1 British style lies), lack of honor (Wilson 14 points). They masquerade behind the once decent and close race of Celts and Anglo-Saxons as stepping stone to subdue the world, .

What you have stated above is complete bullshit. Evidence please for Druid work on mind/genetics, liberalism, piracy, hypnosis, modern economics, modern propaganda and lack of honour or is that hidden in a secret esoteric vault?..

Evidence of Druids? We know more about the eskimos or the Yeti than about the Druids.
They made human sacrifices but encyclopaedias protect them, excusing them as "law", they were foreigners, but impose themselves as ruling elite on all their aspects of life. Pure parasitism.
There are some books about it, like;
Identity of the religions called druidical and Hebrew 1829
http://www.archive.org/details/identity ... 00idengoog
Anyway, read what was said about them by the classics, check the history of the Church, the first orders of Benedictines and Cistercians, check the refuge of Templars in Welsh.
And I haven't entered into historical duplicates...

The Christian "God" is Satan.

Christ is not Satan. Attribution please......

What about the cathars, the camisards, the manicheans, the gnostics, or "recent" books like;

Fritsch Theodor Yahwe der Falsche Gott
http://www.archive.org/details/Fritsch- ... lsche-Gott
Or a modern Forbidden Religion of Herrou Aragon
http://theforbiddenreligion.com/recurso ... ligion.pdf

[rerevisionist]

This thread is supposed to be about RACE and the exploitation of possible race hatreds.

I looked at one of the online books linked by Sorensen731 (in English translation). Here's a short extract taken at random---

... The soul is pure love, not True Love but that which we know as love, that which we believe is love, that which we have been told is love, which in actual fact is hatred. The Spirit is the opposite; It is perceived as pure hatred, hostility and revenge. Due to being shackled in this satanic creation the only thing the Spirit can feel is hostility and hatred, that which ordinary men know as hatred. The Spirit, [49] which is Pure Love, can only feel aversion and disgust before this thing that is, in fact, pure garbage. That is why the Spirit wants to destroy this satanic creation, because for It, creation is a deformed monstrosity which should never have come into existence. This is what Cain’s murder of Abel symbolises. ....

There's plenty more, the sort of thing that is produced when rather naive people are exposed only to one line of thought, and for some reason never escape its influence. Is this sort of thing really intended to be taken seriously?

---

---

Mod: I inserted the following in Sept 2012 (by 'Owlbear' in OccidentalObserver.net) as commentary on visual appearances of races & subraces, and the effects these appearances have, or may have, on other races.

I may add another point (please excuse my poor English): About a year ago at the Thiazi forum which has by now been shut down by the “German” government there was an interesting and competent discussion about the different impressions that different racial and sub-racial types make.

It started with the question whether Cro-Magnon-types or Aurignac-Types look more dangerous. For example, there is a certain physiological type, common in all races that looks brutish, impressive, bear-like, full of primitive physical strength. In the European races this is represented by the Cro-Magnon specimen. Their bodies and faces tell you: “Careful, I am strong!”. But there is also a type that looks more elegant, cunning, wolf-like. This is represented by the Aurignac type. Their message is: “Be careful, I am fast!” Whenever a tribe would conquer another one the representatives of both this Alpha male groups would recognize, battle, exterminate or respect each other.

In contrast, subdominant types like the Alpinoid that arose from the cleansed rests of conquered and enslaved early Cro-Magnon people (in Europe) or conquered and enslaved other groups in the rest of the world) look totally different. They have this “I am harmless, do not hurt me” - feminine, round, fatty, small appearance, together with a cyclothyme temper (emotional, social, multi-tasking etc.) in contrast to schizothyme or vicious temper of Alpha males (schizothyme~fanatical, intellectual, ingenious ~ Aurignac; vicious ~ pain-resistant, unbreakable ~Cro-Magnon).

Typically, whole races that have been driven to the edges of extinction or the fringe by stronger ethnicities tend to appear subdominant. Just take South American jungle indios in contrast to the highly developed Plains Indians (although they represent yet another Alpha type, the Dinaric one, which is in European peoples represented by certain types from the Balkans or in ancient Rome: a good example would be Julius Caesar. Dinaric ~ “mature,old” – comparable to the impression that for example birds and reptiles make).

But in the area of the fertile crescent, the middle East, the place where for the longest time in observable history humans lived together in city-civilizations, yet another, third group, could develop. The specimen of this group tend to look like beta-males (take Henry Kissinger, does he not look cute and harmless?) where they in fact are parasitic and aggressive. Of course they need to DECEIVE their counterparts, they do not want to let them see their true nature. Their every physical characteristic was selected for this purpose. Their eyes are without any clarity, pale and cloudy, so that you cannot guess their intentions. Their body language is deceitful, the voice intonation and language talent is programmed to hide, instead of reveal their true intentions.

In this respect it is utterly wrong to say that Jews are Semitic in the sense of an anthropologic group. In fact, what we identify as typical Jewish features is anthropologically known as the “reduced Armenian or Armenoid type”. True Semitic people on the other hand, if they are not degenerated tend to look strongly Dinaric (mature, deep and harsh facial structures, hawk-like noses); if reduced or degenerated Levantine, they look like Beta-males of the more unpleasant sort (but not “cute” = likable, friendly). This explains to some extent the author's instinctive reactions, instincts that were to his own surprise misguiding him; just like the cuckoo misguides his adoptive parents.

One last thought: Why did our ancestors let the Jews come and live among them? Why did they not conquer, destroy or repel them? why did they not integrate them? Because the Jews were neither really a subordinated or conquered race like for example the blacks in India, but they appeared just as harmless as any of these. And because the were not looking like Alpha males (at least after their ethnogenesis was completed in Babylon and they ceased to be Semites in the sense of “the scum of Egypt”) but even more of a threat of a threat as any Alpha-appearing group.

The same is true with gypsies, although to a lesser degree of perfection since they came from a younger city-civilization and their selection process is not finished.

[The piece Owlbear was commenting on dealt with a white American attending a meeting at the Vatican at which a Jewish Ambassador was making some sort of presentation. The American was surprised to find he felt drawn towards the Jew—apparently after discussing Laurel and Hardy—rather than Catholic Italians.]