[rerevisionist]

Interesting idea from Internet: Jewish ritual freeing from guilt: "Knowledge in Plain Sight" is part of their teachings in the Zohar. Kabbalists believe that if they publicly reveal their plans, it spiritually frees them of any guilt.

Interesting and may help explain a lot; for example, fake NASA moon photos may have included mistakes not as tip-offs to the world by disheartened employees, but rather an arcane Jewish ritual to make them feel good. Or 'feel real good' perhaps. Click thia link (long file on Jews; will eventually go to the relevant part of the file on Jews):-
Knowledge in Plain Sight of Gentiles

[NUKELIES]

I think I have discovered something quite amazing: Not only was Heathrow Airport built in the shape of The Seal of Solomon, but it may have also been built in the shape of Baphomet!

Check out the following pics:

Aerial_photograph_of_Heathrow_Airport_1955.jpg (463.42 KiB) Viewed 341 times

baphomet.jpg (214.48 KiB) Viewed 341 times

Heathrow-Baphomet.jpg (432.51 KiB) Viewed 341 times

The "Dissolve / Congeal" mudra outline in the design of Heathrow is even more evident in the 1955 photograph at top.

Heathrow-Baphomet-Outlines.jpg (254.91 KiB) Viewed 341 times

baphomet-head.jpg (127.98 KiB) Viewed 341 times

Heathrow-Baphomet-Head.jpg (222.1 KiB) Viewed 341 times

[rerevisionist]

I'd have thought it's more to do with arranging take-off and landing strips around a prevailing west wind (the long axis of your photo is west-east), with associated areas for parking planes; and also arranging smoothly-curving roads for car traffic to go under some of the horizontal zones - and probably quite a bit of road added later to allow for the huge increase in motor traffic since the mid-1950s.

[NUKELIES]

Yeah but what about Nimrod Rd? That's the key to the puzzle. It crosses just south of where the Concord model used to be (now a boring Emirates Airbus).

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimrod

-Extra-Biblical traditions associating him with the Tower of Babel led to his reputation as a king who was rebellious against YHWH.

- Sir Walter Raleigh devoted several pages in his History of the World (c. 1616) to reciting past scholarship regarding the question of whether it had been Nimrod or Ashur who built the cities in Assyria.

-Since Classical times, Nimrod has traditionally been considered the leader of those who built the Tower of Babel in the land of Shinar, though the Bible never actually states this. Nimrod’s kingdom included the cities of Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, all in Shinar. (Ge 10:10) Therefore it was likely under his direction that the building of Babel and its tower began; in addition to Flavius Josephus, this is also the view found in the Talmud (Chullin 89a, Pesahim 94b, Erubin 53a, Avodah Zarah 53b), and later midrash such as Genesis Rabba. Several of these early Judaic sources also assert that the king Amraphel, who wars with Abraham later in Genesis, is none other than Nimrod himself.

-Judaic interpreters as early as Philo and Yochanan ben Zakai (1st century AD) interpreted "a mighty hunter before the Lord" (Heb. : לפני יהוה, lit. "in the face of the Lord") as signifying "in opposition to the Lord"

-Some rabbinic commentators have also connected the name Nimrod with a Hebrew word meaning 'rebel'.

-Josephus wrote:
"Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. Now the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God; and they built a tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was. It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners; but he caused a tumult among them, by producing in them diverse languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another. The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion…"

-The Bible does not mention any meeting between Nimrod and Abraham, although a confrontation between the two is said to have taken place, according to several Jewish and Islamic traditions. Some stories bring the both together in a cataclysmic collision, seen as a symbol of the confrontation between Good and Evil, and/or as a symbol of monotheism against polytheism.

-In some versions (as in Flavius Josephus), Nimrod is a man who sets his will against that of God. In others, he proclaims himself a god and is worshipped as such by his subjects, sometimes with his consort Semiramis worshipped as a goddess at his side.

So Nimrod built the Tower of Babel.

babylonEU4.jpg (35.83 KiB) Viewed 321 times

The European Parliament is built as a New Tower of Babel:

parliament.jpg (40.17 KiB) Viewed 321 times

rerevisionist It's a crazy idea to believe nuclear bombs don't exist, right? But they don't. It's crazy to think that they used the sun to create 'footage' of nuclear bombs. But they did. People often denigrate my theory that they use the sun for this purpose in part because they worship it. But check this out:

europarliament-395.jpg (44.58 KiB) Viewed 321 times

The seating layout of the EU Parliament - in the Tower of Babel which Nimrod built - is in the shape of the Sun!

The craziest thing is to believe that we are crazy for asking questions. A good question to ask is: Is Heathrow Airport designed in the shape of the Seal of Solomon? Does it also incorporate the shape of Baphomet - the god the Templars were accused of worshipping by Pope Clement V - into it? What does it mean if these things are true? What is the real religion that governs the planet? Who are its adherents?

[voerioc]

I find this believable. There is indeed the star of David. And the Baphomet representation is just at the upper point of the star of David. And we know that the power that be loves to put marks everywhere. So it's perfectly possible. I think it's a great discovery.

In Paris, there is the Opera Bastille which has a shape of a tower of Babel. Same thing for the Cathedral of Evry. In front of the town hall of Paris, there is a stylized image of a boat. If you turn the image upside down, it is a candelabra with 7 branches. Etc, etc...

[NUKELIES]

Thanks to voerioc for references to the following Tower of Babel-inspired architecture:

Opera-Bastille.jpg (25.72 KiB) Viewed 311 times

Evry-Cathedral.jpg (14.79 KiB) Viewed 311 times

A blatant reference to globalism:

Paris Town Hall Optical Illusion.jpeg (11.85 KiB) Viewed 311 times

It has become standard practice in the Truth Movement that if one does not ascribe ultimate power to Zionists one is 'outed' as being 'in league' with them. But I am interested in the truth. From what I have gathered, the true history of the Jews is at its crux the battle between monotheism and polytheism. What culture does this conflict call to mind? That of Ancient Egypt. There are similarities between Moses and Akhenaten. The history of the Jews is likely the history of the Pharaohs. This especially includes Abraham.

I have no interest in attempting to exonerate anyone. But stopping at the Jews is ignorant. Who are the Jews? Why and how have they persisted for so long? What were they doing in Egypt? Alternative history is painting the picture that they were Akhenaten and his people who were ousted for their monotheistic beliefs - monopoly. What's happening to the world today? Monopoly.

So it's all well and good to take a pragmatic approach to analysis of world events. But esoteric history is part of world events. Otherwise the Freemasons, who have obviously exercised a great deal of power for the past several centuries, wouldn't share the Seal of Solomon with Israel and the United States and Great Britain and China.

Square-And-Compass-Freemason-Symbols-300x281.jpg (29.88 KiB) Viewed 311 times

660px-Flag_of_Israel.jpg (17.05 KiB) Viewed 311 times

Aerial_photograph_of_Heathrow_Airport_1955.jpg (51.25 KiB) Viewed 311 times

dollar_hexagram.jpg (84.6 KiB) Viewed 311 times

20_Pound_Note-Seal_of_-Solomon_Over_Bank_of_England.jpg (93.98 KiB) Viewed 311 times

1YCU.jpg (52.19 KiB) Viewed 311 times

[voerioc]

About the boat in front of the town hall of Paris which portrays a 7 branches candelabra when turned upside down, this is this one :



Upside down :



And, maybe the two kind of towers on each side of the candelabra are in fact a very stylized representation of Baphomet, with the arms being represented by the paving stones. But you can't be sure.

[NUKELIES]

Thanks - I couldn't find it. Those could be stylized Baphomet heads. In fact, Baphomet's head is similar to the fleur de lis. The archaic English spelling of fleur de lis is fleur-de-luce - "flower of light" - calling into question a possible relationship with Illuminism / Luciferianism / sun worship - the same sun used to create fake footage of nuclear bombs.

Fleur de luce (10.66 KiB) Viewed 303 times

Baphomet Face T.gif (19.43 KiB) Viewed 303 times

Baphomet is also similar to Proto Shiva - the oldest form of hindu god - images of which were found in the Indus Valley civilisation Mohenjo-Daro. Proto Shiva has the same horns, the same phallic projection issuing upwards from his head, a comparable arm mudra position, is ithyphallic (erect phallus), and is similarly elevated. It is also three-faced, which means that hindus are still worshipping the same triumvirate god that they worshipped five thousand years ago.

Proto Shiva seal from the Indus Valley Mohenjo-Daro civilisation ca. 2600–1900 BC

Pasupati_15440.jpg (30.29 KiB) Viewed 303 times

Buddha is sometimes featured with a Baphomet-like phallic projectile rising from his head. Otherwise he usually has a toned-down phallic mound.

>!-- id=73 for this image -->

buddha head phallus.jpg (42.14 KiB) Viewed 303 times

buddha head.jpg (26.87 KiB) Viewed 303 times

The Assyrian winged-bulls at the British Museum and The Met feature overtly horn/phallus helmets.

Assyrian.jpg (275.68 KiB) Viewed 303 times

Also, there is a statue of George Washington, in Washington D.C., which represents him in the Dissolve / Congeal mudra. Also notable is the sword which he holds pointing at his side. This can be interpreted as the caduceus phallus/yoni which Baphomet dons. It can also have a further esoteric meaning which is in reference to the piercing of Christ's side by Pontius Pilate. Christ was made spiritually hermaphroditic by the piercing. Typhon, Set, and Buddha are all said to have been born from their mother's side - a suggestion of virgin hermaphroditic birth, or even cloning.

pic-washington_baphomet.gif (25.22 KiB) Viewed 303 times

[voerioc]

We can also wonder if "Google" isn't also a representation of Baphomet.

the two "o" could represent the eyes. The left "G" would represent the right arm (which goes up). And the right "g" would represent the left arm (which goes down).

So, if this is the case, when you go on the Google page, you go in fact on the Baphomet page.

[rerevisionist]

I think this thread belongs in 'Other Revisionisms' rather than this history of 'nukes' section.

Yes, I'm all in favour of investigating everything. But imagery and iconography, and coded and old language, all all tricky things to interpret.

[1] Some images tend to recur for sound practical reasons. For example one might reasonably expect square rooms and upright buildings anywhere on earth. Equilateral triangles and hexagons can be found by packing things together. Circles give an efficient area-to-circumference ratio. Flags, because of the way cloth was made, often had stripes and simple patterns. The world's various alphabets presumably must all have individual symbols which seem clearly separate, to the experienced user.
[2] Techniques tend to impose subtle aspects of form. For example, ancient clay tablets had cuneiform text, no doubt because it was the easiest way to get impressions in wet clay. Roman lettering with a V-shaped cross section, and terminal serifs, was made by chipping out stone with a chisel. Flat nibs on pens give different thicknesses of stroke in different directions. Brush inkwork gives its own style of tapering. Machine engraving enabled very detailed hard-to-forge fine lines to be made, and these have appeared on all fairly modern banknotes as far as I know.
[3] There are plenty of examples of influences - this may be copying, or just assimilation. The Egyptians used the same stylised figures for perhaps a few thousand years, presumably being taught in successive generations. And the Victorians used Gothic revival architecture, and also some Renaissance copying, because they liked the effect, and these styles in any case had their own vocabulary of effects and detailing. The Japanese and Chinese started to use perspective in drawings only relatively recently, and e.g. shadows on faces - they at first wondered why western art showed portrait faces 'half dirty'. So if some emblem or pattern appears, it may just be copied because it looked attractive, or reinvented, or modified from some different pattern.
[4] Because ancient things are often mysterious, an artifical air of mystery or antiquity can be invented. Fakes of ancient objects obviously try to imitate styles and objects. Coats of arms of e.g. US agencies illustrate the sort of thing. And artifical histories can be invented. I suspect the 'Freemasons' and other societies are almost entirely made up, from miscellaneous real or supposed ancient influences. A lot of the British monarchy has invented pseudo-tradition attached to it; the 1953 coronation coach - a gold-painted horse-drawn thing with corners leading up to a central peak - is an example. Conversely, many ancient artefacts are hard to decode - Elizabethan paintings are full of allegorical, symbolic detail in addition to fashionable, national, occupational and status-related features.
[5] The human shape is more or less constant, so any posture is unlikely to be uniquely recognisable, though there are e.g. Rodin's 'Thinker' and the well-known figure of Voltaire. In fact, portraits use stylised postures to indicate heroism or authority or feminity.

Anyway - I'm cautious about this sort of thing! I'm not even sure something as familiar as today's pack of playing cards is understood. There's also the problem of what a 'religion' really means - can there be one, with a small group of people? It obviously can't be a religion in the normal sense of binding together large groups of people. And 'worship' - if there's a Rothschild place-setting left empty, attributed to the devil, what does this really mean?

[NUKELIES]

voerioc the Google thing is shocking. It makes sense. The 'l' could be the caduceus/phallus/yoni. A google is a supposedly a mathematical term for 'infinite zeros' - which implies ultimate magnetism through negative or positive pull -- like the world's biggest lodestone found in the United Nations nondenominational chapel in New York City.

All speculation of course.

rerev Hyper-pragmatism has its limitations. The human mind is in two equal parts: brain and heart. The intuition is not inferior to the intellect. That is the meaning of the balance between male and female as symbolised in the Seal of Solomon. Rationalism is only half the ballgame. That's why the Enlightenment descended into Romanticism, because they are complements. In order to understand the Universe and God and Nature, one must delve into the darkness of irrationality. The true powers-that-be are those who master this balance between reason and intuition. It is therefore necessary to study their footprints, and to try to become one of them.

Seal-of-Solomon.jpg (20.12 KiB) Viewed 282 times