[rerevisionist]

Revisionism in Biology - Harold Hillman's work

Harold's last book is available as a PDF download, or may be ordered as a hard-copy book, Evidence-Based Cell Biology - With Some Implications for Clinical Research (2008), published by Shaker, who I thought were Dutch, but may be German - their website is shaker.de and their niche is academic publishing.

His first book was Certainty and Uncertainty in Biochemical Techniques (1972), the title being a reference to the 'uncertainty principle'. It was followed in 1980 by The Living Cell, jointly written by the microscopist and telescopist Peter Sartory. They made a film of 35 minutes (there may be two versions - I'm unsure) on The Fine Structure of the Living Cell (1977), which was made in an attempt to overcome the censorship surrounding Hillman's work; it was shown at many universities and I think some schools - at least 150 lectures. You may be able to watch the film (with my introduction and voiceover, and watermark; copyright permission from Surrey university) on
https://www.axcellbio.com/cell-biology/harold-hillmans-long-lost-film1-true-structure-of-the-living-cell-biology-truther-movement/

His other work was largely to do with the structure of the brain (e.g. receptors as a mistake, synapse with chemical transmisison a mistake). However he wrote a large number of papers on somewhat related subjects, mostly concerned to debunk generally accepted beliefs - properties of ATP, epilepsy, schizophrenia, problems with centrifugation and electron microscopy and other techniques (his first book), nucleolar membrane, artefacts such as the trilaminar membrane, Golgi body, endoplasmic reticulum, 'protein coat' of viruses, ion channels, free radicals, the sliding filament theory of muscles .... With some suggestions of his own - e.g. an electrical transmission theory. He was not entriely isolated - Gilbert Ling (Chinese American, co-inventor of NMR imaging - nuclear magnetic resonance; later renamed MRI to dodge the 'nuclear' word) worked on similar lines.

NB he specifically disclaimed detailed knowledge in virology, immunology, and genetics.

[FirstClassSkeptic]

Whatever happened to that story that came out a couple years ago that nerve cells communicate acoustically?

[bamzam]

I don't know if it's my computer or connection but the hillman link will not open for me. I did find another link with video missing and this written below,

Sorry, "Harold Hillman's long lost film on 'The Living Cell' - Mistakes in Biological Science" was deleted at 11:14:56 Tue May 24, 2011. Vimeo has removed or disabled access to the following material as a result of a third-party notification by Harold Hillman claiming that this material is infringing: Harold Hillman's long lost film on 'The Living Cell' - Mistakes in Biological Science. We have no more information about it on our mainframe or

https://vimeo.com/21396699

[rerevisionist]

? No, the link's fine. I use Mozilla Firefox - maybe that's the reason? Yes, Harold didn't like my introduction, which mentions various frauds, including the 'Holocaust'. But I didn't want to change it. I have copyright permission, but Youtube generally remove videos if anybody makes a copyright claim - they probably don't want to get involved.

Anyway try the link again.

[bamzam]

The link finallly worked for me, I know how youtube can be but there are many other hosting sites you can try

www.divxden.com
www.putlocker.com
www.megavideo.com
www.sockshare.com to name a few

also alternatively you could host them for downloading

www.rapidshare.com
www.megaupload.com
www.fileserve.com
www.depositfiles.com

[rerevisionist]

Thanks, banzam. However, my experience with other sites is that they are festooned with ads and not easy to operate, and are liable not to work - Youtube dominates partly because it seems to have got things about right, though I appreciate it's a situation that could stop at any moment.

A thought that occurred to me re Hillman is that Steven Rose is a perfect example of a Jewish phoney academic. Hillman's cell biology ideas were certainly known by Rose - Hillman told him, himself. Rose's book on biology was described by Hillman, rather confusingly, as 'good' - meaning that it summarised very well all the current errors. Rose is also associated with the 'Socialist Workers Party' and in particular the anti-white race element of this, though I doubt whether the genuine workers in that movement have a clue about the sinister motivational underpinnings of Rose, and other members of his supposed racial tribe.

[bamzam]

rerevisionist I'm sorry you are experiencing ads when you don't need to. I hope you are using Firefox web browser with the "adblock-plus" addon. You will never see an ad or pop up ever again if you are doing this.

[rerevisionist]

I've just found a website about Harold Hillman online - an extremely sketchy one, with three free downloads (I'd guess made with Word, then saved in PDF format; right-click the links to load into a new tab)--

1. A 40-page commentary on the actual structure of the brain and nervous system in mammals - a very reduced and condensed version of his immensely detailed work. It starts with a survey of the official or traditional view, then gives his evidence that the view is wrong and how the errors came about from over-optimistic assumptions about the usefulness of such techniques as electron microscopy https://www.harold-hillman.com/wp-content/un-published-papers/A%20Radical%20Reassessment%20of%20the%20Real%20Cellular%20Structure%20of%20the%20Mammalian%20Nervous%20System.pdf

2. An open letter to cell biologists, his overview of the state (or in US English 'shape') of cell biology as it is now (and has been since about 1960). It's about 20 pages long. The conclusion includes this:

It is widely believed that medical research since the Second World War has been very
successful. This research work may be divided into three kinds:
(a) some important findings have been serendipitous or accidental, for example: discovery of penicillin; use of lithium for bipolar disorders ; neuroleptics for schizophrenia; steroids for skin diseases;
(b) many apparent advances have resulted from applications of technology. These include: mass vaccination; intensive care units; cardiac surgery; war surgery; keyhole surgery; tissue transplantation;
(c) there is a third kind of medical research [sc. deep research of the sort Hillman was involved in] into the genesis of diseases, such as carcinoma, sarcoma, leukaemia, multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimers’ dementia, motor neuron disease, muscular dystrophy, etc. It is absolutely remarkable how unsuccessful this sort of research has been. If one knew the basic mechanisms ... one could then design logical interventions to prevent them developing. ...

https://www.harold-hillman.com/wp-content/un-published-papers/Cell%20biology%20at%20the%20beginning%20of%20the%2021st%20century%20is%20in%20dire%20straits.pdf

3. 'A Career in Neurobiology' - a 50-page intellectual autobiography, with a table of contents, which surveys his life's work, including current beliefs of almost all workers in cell biology, then the truth: his own discoveries - problems with subcellular fractionation and electron microscopy (and other techniques), problems with beliefs about the nervous system (types of neuroglia, whether synapses in fact exist), other biological and biochemistry issues (resuscitation, pain, the nucleolar membrane, the error of 'high-energy phosphates', the errors of chemical transmission and receptor ideas). And Hillman has philosophical discussions on truth, and on fraud and (his own neologism) 'parafraud'.
https://www.harold-hillman.com/wp-content/un-published-papers/A%20career%20in%20neurobiology.pdf
____________________________

His films seem to be still unobtainable. My own extremely good high-definition video, 'Harold Hillman and the Cells of Deception', describing and containing his first 1970s film 'The Living Cell', seems to have completely vanished - if it's out there, it's unindexed by google.
____________________________

This is 'What Price Intellectual Honesty?' a longer intellectual autobiography but with more emphasis on the 'human interest' side - obstructive scientists, refusals of papers, refusals to reply, and all the rest of it:--
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://174.122.112.226/~rwest/mb1whatp.htm

[rerevisionist]

nogoodendinsight said:--
Your links to Harold Hillman's films do not work, the pages are not found, which does not astonish me at all. On a Springer Press site I found a copy of one of his books for US $ 733, another form of censorship.
Where might I find the film?

Look above for comments on his books and papers. Some books are available used of 'second-hand' in the British phrase. His latest book can be downloaded as a PDF which is protected, and can't be printed out, or at least not easily.

He made three films, or four if you count a two-parter, with the help of the audio-visual dept of his University, which is credited with the copyright. I put one film them online, with an intro which I think is needed to explain his claims. His style is a bit non-confrontational, so the message tends to be muffled. However, Harold took exception to my comments, one of which compared frauds like 'AIDS' and cell biology with the fraud of the 'Holocaust', as I like to be direct! He made a copyright claim and Youtube backed off, reasonably enough as they have better things to do. If I can find another hosting site, I'll put it back.

[nogoodendinsight]

Thank you for the additional info on Hillman. I am at the moment reading ''A Radical Reassessment...'' which shares an important thing with Dr Hamer's work: when reading it, the hair on the back of my neck is standing on end and shivers are running up and down my spine continually, because of a gut feeling that there is a lot of truth in that material. I am no new-ager. My information stems from a largish number of books, some of which have been suppressed, which I read in the last forty years. The puzzle pieces are falling into place.

I found a website which contains Hamer material in English:
https://learninggnm.com/documents/hamerb ... Harassment

Of course I found this link on a website where they parade presumed victims of Dr Hamer's. All the million non-jews killed by morphine and chemotherapy are not mentioned at all, of course.

I will now dive into my library to search out the correspondence between Hamer and the chief rabbi in israel, where this sob flatly admits what the survival rates for his co-religionists who are treated according to Hamer are.

A friend of Dr Hamer's, Ing Pilhar in Austria, used to send info letters to subscribers. However, his information must have proved too dangerous for distribution, he has now a website and the letters were discontinued.

One of the letters contained information that former German chancellor Helmut Kohl had more than one skeleton in the basement: one of them is his real name, which is Henoch Kohn.

The letter that got him off the web was the information concerning former pope John Paul II, whose Polish name Karol Wojtyla is a common jewish name; his parents were jews and he was a rabbi. His ''sister'' who used to go camping with good ol' John all the time wasn't his sister at all (although the jews' stand on sibling marriage is universally known as the source of several thousand inheritable degenerative diseases). On his deathbed she presumably asked him whether she should destroy the love letters he had written to her over the years. He purportedly told her not to because it would be a pity.

Prohibiting the distribution of such information does say something about prohibiter and info.

[nogoodendinsight]

Sorry for the wait. I am rather busy writing a book, the research for which takes an enormous amount of my time. Thanks again for the Hillman info. I discussed it with my therapist - I suffer from the aftereffects of botched back surgery - and she got all red-cheeked and said that ''obviously, everything I learned in med school was wrong'' and she smiled. The next time I met her she had read the Hillman pdfs and said the same thing, but this time she wasn't smiling anymore.

I looked through the letters Ing Pilhar sent over the years, they have been copied from his emails and they are in German. Most of their contents should be on the English website I mention in my earlier post. If you are interested I could send them to your mailbox via pm because I don't know how to add them to my post, sorry.

The impostor getting ready to claim Dr Hamer's work as his own is named Roberto Barnai, he's a young hungarian rabbi aspiring to becoming a chief rabbi if this scam gets through.

Although this tread is under the ''OFF TOPIC'' label, it shows with crystal clarity the tactics of those who think they do control it all. Their awakening might be painful.

What's more, some of my friends, and I'm only talking about the most intelligent ones, when being confronted with the nuke scam, they really get to thinking. The fact that Hiroshima and Nagasaki show continuous settlement is the clincher; how could this possibly be, when newspapers all over the world had been spreading the radiation fear porn since the thirties? And no genetic mutations attributable to radiation poisoning have been found to date. Another scam that blew up in their faces. In a few years you will be called VISIONAIRIES.

[rerevisionist]

I'm interested in your support for Dr Hamer, but (if I've understood it - and there may be masses of material not on Internet) he has a theory that cancer is started by a shock of some sort. The problem I have with this, is that very many people have had physical shocks - there are large numbers of motor accidents, for example; and many people have come under attack by high explosives, bombs, bullets and so on. It's not surprising that such victims have psychological traumas - but do they suffer high cancer rates? Not that I know of.