Russian nuclear chief says Japan exaggerating nuclear crisis

Dumploads? Covert uses? Radiation? Submarines? Chernobyl, Fukushima &c. Coal, oil, wind, solar. Electric grids

Russian nuclear chief says Japan exaggerating nuclear crisis

Postby NUKELIES » 14 Apr 2011 14:24

fukushima explosion.jpg
fukushima explosion
fukushima explosion.jpg (43.74 KiB) Viewed 592 times
From http://news.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BN ... 73507.html

Russia's nuclear chief says Japan exaggerating nuclear crisis
SANYA - Japanese authorities are exaggerating the scope of the country's nuclear disaster to give insurance companies an out, Russia's nuclear chief said on Wednesday.

"It is hard for me to assess why the Japanese colleagues have taken this decision. I suspect, this is more of a financial issue, than a nuclear one," Sergei Kiriyenko said on the sidelines of a bilateral meeting between the Russian president and Indian prime minister ahead of a meeting of major developing economies in southern China.

Japanese officials on Tuesday upgraded the severity of the emergency at the tsunami-damaged Fukushima plant to a 7, putting it on par with the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster, the world's worst.

"I guess that maybe it could be linked to the definition of force-majeure with regard to insurance. I would pay attention to that. It is a bit strange," Kiriyenko said.


More likely this faux-colossal "nuclear" disaster is an attempt at massive economic destabilization of Japan by whoever's pulling the strings of globalism.
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: Russian nuclear chief says Japan exaggerating nuclear cr

Post
by mooninquirer » 16 Apr 2011 02:01

This is very helpful, because I thought the same thing --- that Japan is exaggerating the nuclear crisis. They raised the disaster level to a "7" which is the same level as Chernobyl. But that is impossible, because in Chernobyl, there was GRAPHITE as a moderator which caught fire and burned, spewing the radioactive wastes from the fuel rods into the atmosphere. The Japanese reactors use water as a moderator.

And I think the Japanese has two incentives to exaggerate, which are greater than a desire to get insurance money. One is more sympathy from the United States, but another is a desire to engage in propaganda on behalf of Israel, which wants war with Iran very badly. Since we are no longer living in the 1950s, there is no WAY the Zionists could scare the American public over the threat of the devastation of nuke bombs by showing that fake footage from the 50s, there must be some other way to get the public really scared about the ( supposed ) destructive power of nuke bombs. Having the radiation exaggerated is a great way to do that.

Japan agrees to what Israel wants, because Japan also wants a very strong alliance with America, as she is in a very vulnerable geostrategic situation ----- being very close to China, a very large, powerful, historic enemy of Japan. And the leaders of Japan know very well that it is the Zionist Jews who control America --- so this is why they are appeasing Israel with this propaganda.

And this scare tactic HAS worked. Mark Glenn ( of www.theuglytruth.podbean.com ) had a program recently in which he said there is a lot of talk in Northern Idaho where he lives, that a cloud of radioactivity has floated over the Pacific Ocean from Japan. He even worried that he might have to be relocated. Now, Mark Glenn is very skeptical of the veracity of the news media, and knows that FDR knew about Pearl Harbor in advance, that 911 was done by Zionist Jews, etc. But the important thing is that KNOWLEDGE means nothing without EMOTION which is the force that motivates people to act. I did not read that about propaganda, but I am sure this must be a cornerstone principle of propaganda techniques ---- and it is why scare tactics are so valuable to the Zionist Jews.

Israel might also want to build a case that Iran should not be entitled to nuke power plants, because they are inherently very dangerous. They might wish to have outrageous safeguards imposed upon Iran. When Iran refuses to comply, Israel will want to declare to the whole world that Iran is irresponsible, wreck prone, and poses an endangerment to the lives of millions of people. This might be another excuse for war with Iran, although this strategy could backfire, because with bombs falling all over Iran, their nuke power plants will be destroyed and release radioactive matter into the atmosphere.

I informed Mark Glenn of WHY the media ---- which Mark Glenn knows is Zionist ---- is exaggerating the radioactive disaster, and that there is also a lot of natural radioactivity, for example from radon gas, and radium in water, since uranium ( which slows decays into radium ), is present throughout all soil and rock, and is especially in higher concentrations in igneous rock, like granite. Also, Madame Curie worked very closely all her life with radioactive substances, without using protection, yet she lived to 67. Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn also worked with radioactive substances, and they both lived to 89. Also, I referred that very useful article about the UN agency UNSCEAR that declared that the radioactivity around Chernobyl is highly exaggerated. ( see the post on this website " Where's the radiation at Chernobyl ?" )

mooninquirer
 

Re: Russian nuclear chief says Japan exaggerating nuclear cr

Postby anordinaryamerican » 03 May 2011 05:55

I have looked at many clips of the Japan "tsunami disaster" - they are mostly fake. There may have been a small tsunami but the damage is extremely exaggerated. Therefore, I believe the nuclear threat is a hoax. I don't know anything about nuclear weapons or any type of bomb, but I can spot composites and other fakery in film and photos. That is why I was taken by the Nuclear Bombs are a Lie video because it is based on the fabrication of the film footage. One can assume that if a government must fabricate film and pass it off as "news" for the sake of inducing fear in it's citizens, there is actually nothing to fear but that government who would use propaganda and PSYOPS on the very people it is supposed to protect. Now that's scary, and evil. I actually don't think Americans have anything to fear from other countries/governments. The U. S. government and it's Puppet Master Israel must be stopped.

An Ordinary American
anordinaryamerican
 
Posts: 3
Joined: 03 May 2011 05:31

Re: Russian nuclear chief says Japan exaggerating nuclear cr

Postby NUKELIES » 03 May 2011 07:45

anordinaryamerican wrote:composites and other fakery in film and photos.


A few cunning detractors / provocateurs commenting on NUKE LIES, as well as member TVOW posting on this forum, spin the contrived possibility that just because film footage is faked doesn't mean nuclear bombs are not real. I say film fakery is prime evidence of a hoax. If there were something real to show they wouldn't need to create fake footage of it.

Thanks for joining anordinaryamerican I appreciate your perspective.
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: Russian nuclear chief says Japan exaggerating nuclear cr

Postby rerevisionist » 03 May 2011 14:03

Like 'NUKELIES', I'm pleased to see new commentators here. (We seem to have about 10:1 professional spammers at present).

Some (or all?) of the Gulf oil spill material is fake--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgxW9M_B82Y
is a nice one showing someone opening a door underwater - I suppose they couldn't be bothered to edit it out.

I wish I could see a common thread here. My best guess is that at any one time there's some group or nation being made out to be the enemy. Or some group singled out for praise. All the usual media then pick up stories reflecting a bias - e.g. at the moment the media seem to be pretending to be experts on Syria and its politics and you see jokes and comments repreating the attitude even in websites on feminism, say. (Britain's Private Eye often has things like this - it has comments wondering how Libya funded some of the LSE, something never of course mentioned before). Some of the TV pictorial stuff must be inserted just to support the desired attitude - Japanese incompetence? 'Nuclear power' to be phased out? Shell Oil a baddy? Africans highly civilised? - and fakes of e.g. bin Laden or death of Saddam Hussein are just supporting props. This must have applied pre-TV - newsreels of Hitler allegedly ranting, FDR reading out the pre-written Pearl Harbor statement. And pre-film - continuous news items on the Germans, or the Tsar...

And of course, if there really was some danger, or some cause for praise, the same sort of thing would happen - the trick is to do some sort of mental controlled experiment, to compare with other incidents around the world, and try to come to objective conclusions. No wonder it's incredibly difficult.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Russian nuclear chief says Japan exaggerating nuclear cr

Postby anordinaryamerican » 04 May 2011 07:43

To Nukelies - Thanks for inviting me. I have learned much from your videos already. I'm sorry for referring to your video "NUKELIES" as Nuclear Bombs are Lies. It was late, I was tired - what can I say?

"possibility that just because film footage is faked doesn't mean nuclear bombs are not real"

I must admit my thinking initially took that path, briefly. Anyone using logic would go there first. It stands to reason that the propaganda does not necessarily define the event or object addressed in the propaganda. Let's take a TV commercial for hair bleach showing a gorgeous, bikini-wearing girl with hot guys hanging around. Maybe the girl really had a big nose and cellulite on her ass that had to be digitally fixed in the studio. This does not mean the hair bleach does not exist or that it doesn't work. ( It might mean that you will get blonde hair but not the bikini body or the guys.) However, the presumption is that the presenter is truthful about the existence of the object at hand.

My conclusion is this: If the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth does not, or cannot, achieve for the presenter the desired result, which is manipulation of the audience's emotions and behavior, then the subject matter does not exist in reality. If one has to change, enhance, re-do, cover-up, fabricate, stretch, tweek, or spin the truth to present the reality of an object, then that exact and particular object does not exist. As in all of the media fakery, there is a grain of truth somewhere inside the lie. Yes, there are big bombs. People sort of like terrorists do exist. There are natural disasters. Once in awhile there is a real mass shooting. (maybe not - who knows)

If mankind had succeeded in splitting the atom, as well as harnessing nuclear fission and the method to weaponize this miracle, we would have already been scared shitless by the authentic, in-the-raw, REAL videos. I mean, really, think about it.

To Revisionist - take heart, we can figure this out. I have some ideas. More later.
AOA
anordinaryamerican
 
Posts: 3
Joined: 03 May 2011 05:31

Re: Russian nuclear chief says Japan exaggerating nuclear cr

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 04 Jun 2011 00:52

User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Return to Nuclear Power Doubts: Nuclear Disasters? Safe Power? Is 'Nuclear Power' a Hoax?


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest