5. Black Londoners Forum

6. Black Information Link (BLINK)

7. Operation Black Vote

8. Federation of Black Housing Organisations (FBHO)

9. Black Training Enterprise Group

10. Southwark Black Heritage Organisation

11. The Action Group for Irish Youth

12. Asians In Media (AIM)

13. Barfi Culture (Asians)

14. Black Britain

15. Black Enterprise

16. Black net Community

17. The Black Presence In Britain

18. Black Search

19. Black UK Online

20. Board Of Deputies of British Jews

21. Chinatown Online

22. Clickwalla (Asian)

23. Dimsum (Chinese)

24. Doncaster Chinese

25. CEMVO

26. Every Generation (Black)

27. Jewish.Co.UK

28. Jewish Telegraph

29. MMLondon (Asian)

30. Red Hot Curry (Asian)

31. National Association of Nigerian Communities - UK (NANC)

32. Barnsley Black and Ethic Minority Initiative

Have you noticed how the media NEVER calls any of these organisations “racist” even though they are openly organised along ethnic lines and stand for the rights of their respective communities?

It seems as if every group has the right to have an organisation speaking up for its rights - EXCEPT the indigenous British people.

In reality, none of these organisations are “racist” — each and every community has the inalienable right to look after its own interests.

This includes the indigenous British folk, and the BNP is proud to be the party which stands up for the rights our folk and country, in exactly the same way that all of the above organisations stand up for their folk.

1. Yet if you highlight the inequalities these organisations throw up, you are then labelled as a racist or trouble maker. Nice to see that the BNP supports organisations doing the same sort of work for Native Britons. I've always wondered how big an uproar there'd be if the following were started or publicised:

   White entertainment television (BET - Black Entertainment television, US TV channel) Music of White origin awards (Music of Black Origin Awards - MOBO's) Miss White America / England (Miss Black America)

   Posted by Andrdew W-G | December 23, 2007, 1:14 pm

2. Racism. Protecting one's own race. if for this I'm labelled a RACIST so be it! BLINK threw claims of racist at the English Rose site. It's just their attempt to prevent any kind of dialogue within the white communities. The Brugges group reported that it's BLINK we have to thank for all the infectious diseases coming into OUR country. When in the Commons, the discussion was to examine every immigrant for various infections. Blink came out with the usual marxist label of RACIST. What a bunch of gutless MPs we have. They are too scared to put the interests of this nation and her peoples first. We now see the results in huge rises in TB, HIV, AIDS and every other kind of infection, not to mention the cost of treatment and neglect of our own folk. Fact. Pre-Labour we had approx 700 cases of AIDS. The latest figures are now standing at 73,000. Thank you Labour. Things can only get better you sang. But for whom?

   Posted by Yorkielass | December 23, 2007, 3:25 pm

3. An extremely important issue here, but again, one which will be removed after 24 hours and forgotten about. This issue should remain on the BNP site for months to come to make people aware of the realities of living in the multi-racial nightmare of Britain today.

   Web editor's note: No posts on this site are “removed” after 24 hours. They are all filed under “News archive” which you can find on the menu at the top of this page, or by using the search facility.

   Posted by igr40 | December 23, 2007, 3:46 pm

4. The BNP is not racist, but for some reason the media portray them as racist. We identify ourself with our Anglo-Saxon group and want to keep it; just like other ethnic groups want theirs keeping, but this obsession by the press to call us racists is bewildering. I would never even consider joining or giving support to such groups who are racists. The idea that one group is superior to another is simply not true. All we want is to keep our identity.

   Posted by davidcopperfield | December 23, 2007, 4:14 pm

5. From it's earliest prehistoric times, the world's human population has comprised a number of distinctly different races, all of them subdivided into several nations, each with its own identity, language and cultural traditions. That is true diversity. There is nothing to prevent any such nation trading with any other, on an equitable, mutually advantageous basis. That is true fair trade. The communist one-worlders rant on endlessly about “diversity” and “fair trade”, while doing everything possible to replace true diversity with a homogenized mass of stateless, disoriented and subjugated people and to reject true fair trade in favour of an exploitative system which allows the globalist elites to amass vast fortunes at the expense of the poorest, lowest-paid people on the planet. Those of us who oppose the imposition of this nightmare New World Order are denounced as “racists”.

   Posted by Noel | December 23, 2007, 6:29 pm

6. Oh yeah. Blink.

   That's the people who've come up with this gem.

   http://www.blink.org.uk/bm/

   “The Black Manefesto”

   I wouldn't mind so much but it's more about getting rid of what rights that we have left, rather than anything remotely to do with equality for all. They would love to see the BNP and it's membership proscribed in all walks of life, not only because they believe that we are racist but because our objectives and aims are counter to the Human Rights Act–you know, all of that legislation that gets failed asylum seekers put on planes back to the UK because they have “a right to a family life”. There you have it. These people want others proscribed and hounded based on what they *think* and any such attempt to defend ourselves against such crap, is racist.

   It is racist for us to organise but it's not racist for them to run around and deny us what they already have. They want all BNP members to be sacked from the civil service, while they not only have jobs in the civil service, but their movements are funded by the government, while we have to fund ourselves. If they got their own way, next it would be no jobs for BNP members in the private sector. They are racist to the bone because they want to deny whites the right to organise. They are the ones who have a message of hate and they are the ones who smile at the prospect of violence against us. These left-wing fascists who are exploiting and creating racist and divisive policies to attract the immigrant vote that they wouldn't get off the natives are the real racists. They are the ones who brought race to politics, not us. They are the ones who are obsessed by race, not us. We just want an equilibrium where everyone is treated the same.

   Where is the equivalent whites-only organisation for social housing?

   http://www.ujimagroup.org.uk/index.html

   Don't white people need housing? Apparently, according to our sell-outs, there is only one thing we all need to do and that's die.

   So let's stop voting for people who have, time and time again, let us down. Now they only promise to “think about” immigration. Now they only promise to “give it serious consideration”.

   That's because we are weak. That's because we are not represented. Vote for a party that represents white people and suddenly white people will be treated as equals with everyone else, and don't let some po-faced angry liberal university graduate tell you otherwise.

   The hypocrisy of Blink does not know any bounds.

   Remember how they went nuts over the so-called racist cartoon in The Sun–you know the cannibal cartoon with Mark Thatcher about to be cooked and eaten by an African leader with a reputation for cannibalism? Where they said that all the features of the Africans were deliberately exaggerated? Well of course the features were exaggerated–it's a cartoon! For further evidence of this, check out the cartoons done by “Felix” over on the BLINK website. The cartoons have very stereotyped and exaggerated features on all the white people, but you don't hear us playing the race card in response.

   Blink are nothing more than a bunch of racist hypocrites who hate white people organising and while they should be allowed to organise (despite being so blatently racist), it's about time decent people cut the money from the 1990 trust who receive a large wad of money from the mayors office. That's right, as a vote-bribing exercise Red Ken bungs the 1990 trust 100 K a year and in return the 1990 trust along with other so called “official” black communities, tell Ken how great he is for black London.

   Posted by hrhdtr | December 23, 2007, 9:34 pm

7. The terms Racism/Racist are becoming threadbare now through hysterical overuse by the self interested (not so) minorities. If it is impossible to stand up and protect your heritage and not be called a racist then every day more and more people are going be accused as such. Mass immigration has made the term crass. Idle bigotry? - no relation. It's necessity.

   Posted by UprightMan | December 24, 2007, 12:56 am

8. At last it has been revealed–the many racist anti-white organisations in Britain today. Let us hope that this report stays on the main web site here PERMANENTLY and is not removed like other news reports on this site. - All news reports remain on the site. You can go back and look at them in “news archives”-Ed

   Posted by igr40 | December 24, 2007, 12:43 pm

9. davidcopperfield: Don't forget the Celts. It doesn't give quite the right impression!

   Posted by apendragon | December 24, 2007, 1:18 pm

10. The BNP should keep this question and answer on the front page of their web site. They should also put it on all correspondence/leaflets/ etc…like a mission statement. The image of the BNP being a racist group needs to be removed from the public arena.

    Posted by godballsoffire | December 24, 2007, 5:29 pm

11. To be a member of the BNP is to be a realist, not a racist. I have yet to meet a member of the public who does not agree with me. I can be talking to an acquaintance about any subject other than politics and more times than not they will bring up the question of how this country is being swamped with immigrants. A few weeks ago I came across a friend of mine building a nice Victorian fence around his garden. “it's to keep Muslims out” were his first words. This is how a lot of people, at “ground” level are thinking in this country to-day. Whizz.

    Posted by whizz | December 24, 2007, 7:53 pm

12. Good to see this article on the main page here. Hope it stays here.This article and all the pro ethnic organisations answers our critics. I agree with the other comment posted here-These pro black organisations and the BNP message here should be on BNP correspondence/ election leaflets/ etc€¦

    Posted by dvg | December 26, 2007, 10:21 am

13. How can the BNP be racist when this is going on? ->

    http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/2007/12/operation-black-vote.html

    Please keep all these articles and all related information on the site so that the public can see for themselves WHY and BY WHOM they and BNP are labelled racist!

    Posted by Dylan | December 26, 2007, 8:11 pm

14. I believe that the word racist is mis-spelled, being in fact, realist. The real racists are those who are in Government here and who have control of the country. They do not want to re-create the movements in Ireland, Wales and Scotland which have seen the national Parties take power from those two parties who long believe only they know best and never the people. Looking amongst those here and in Governments past, the numbers who are not British in any way is quite astounding.

    Posted by David Little | December 27, 2007, 12:02 pm

15. Great article. It just so happens that I had come across “Operation Black Vote” only a couple of days ago. Here's another one to add:

    Black Mental Heath http://www.blackmentalhealth.org.uk/

    Go to the National Black Police Association

    http://www.nbpa.co.uk/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1

    and you will notice, on their web pages (added fairly recently amid criticisms that they are a racist organisation):

    The definition of “Black” does not refer to skin colour. The emphasis is on the common experience and determination of the people of African, African-Caribbean and Asian origin to oppose the effects of racism.

    I would say that we need a…

    National White Police Association and that…

    'The definition of “White” does not refer to skin colour. The emphasis is on the common experience and determination of the people of Caucasian origin to oppose the effects of reverse discrimination.'

    This whole nation has become uncomfortably obsessed with racial group identities. The collectivist mindset is at the heart of racism. Government as an institution is particularly ill-suited to combat bigotry. Bigotry at its essence is a problem of the heart, and we cannot change people's hearts by passing more laws and regulations. The government itself divides us by race, class, religion, and gender. Through its taxes, restrictive regulations, corporate subsidies, racial set-asides, and welfare programs, government plays far too large a role in determining who succeeds and who fails. Government institutionalises group thinking. This can make each group suspicious that others are receiving more of the government loot. This leads to resentment and hostility among us. Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly as members of groups. True racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike. By encouraging Britain to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called “diversity” actually perpetuate racism. The true antidote to racism is a limited, constitutional government devoted to the protection of individual rights rather than group claims, rewarding individual achievement and competence - not skin color, gender, or ethnicity. In a truly free society, every citizen gains a sense of himself as an individual, rather than developing a group or victim mentality. This leads to a sense of individual responsibility and personal pride, making skin color irrelevant. Racism will endure until we stop thinking in terms of groups and begin thinking in terms of individual liberty.

    Posted by Shropshire Lass | December 27, 2007, 1:03 pm

16. Every human being ever born is a ‘racist' in the tribal sense. It's a matter of genetically-determined instinct; different races will always gravitate towards themselves, as sure as eggs is eggs. There's nothing untoward about that, any more than it's ‘wrong' or ‘racist' that seagulls fly around in their own flocks. It doesn't mean seagulls regard any non-seagulls as ‘inferior', and it certainly doesn't mean they read Marx and decide that, against natural logic and instinct, they will force themselves and every non-seagull, to be the 'same'. Because they're not.

    Posted by apendragon | December 27, 2007, 5:21 pm

17. Another one -

    http://www.tmponline.org/?p=271

    Posted by Dylan | December 28, 2007, 4:25 am

18. It's typical double standards by the do-gooders. An example of the do-gooder stuff was Xmas 2006. A local junior school was nearly forced by a school governor to call the Xmas pantomime 3 little puppies instead of 3 little pigs, just so it didn't offend Muslims. It's about time that the British Nationals were considered in ‘not being offended'. Instead we have to pander to the beliefs of ethnic religions for fear of being classed as racist. What next, no pork sausages on the kids school dinner menu?

    Posted by F1Yorkie | December 28, 2007, 3:51 pm

19. Remember, that because white people are the majority in this country, we are branded as racist by the lefties by default, *EVEN* when we follow the lefty agenda. It's easy for them to do that, because generally it's white people (Though the wrong white people) who are wielding most of the power.

    Lefty : “It's racist to control immigration, because black & asian people benefit from economic migration the most.”

    Normal Person : “OK…I give in…I'm tired of being called racist…I'll leave to you to it.”

    Lefty : “Now that we have let these poor people in (They are economic migrants remember), the stats show that they live in the worst housing and that they are poorer than the rest of us. That's because as a society we are racist. That needs to change.” :-/

    * NEVER * Give an inch to the po-faced lefties. If you do, they will racialize politics more and more, making us all look more racist in the process.

    Posted by hrhdtr | December 28, 2007, 5:14 pm

20. Brilliant article and some superb comments, none of it offensive, so if you are RED and are educated, then please realise this. We are not racist.

    Posted by Jawbone | December 28, 2007, 11:24 pm

21. Racist is a much mis-over-used word and normally by those who have a sinister and hidden agenda. Everyone has a tolerance threshold or thresholds. I don't like what muslims believe in, practice or preach. I don't want them in our country and I certainly don't want them as a neighbour. I am offended, outraged even, when I see a female (if it is a female) with only its eyes barely showing. I have to remove a hood or a crash helmet if I walk into a bank but he/she/it is forgiven. At the airport, I am intimately body searched after having my face compared to my passport photo, while wanted male terrorists dress up in a burkha and are waved through security. I could go on and on. How many labour MP's live in down and out black or white areas? They call us racist when we don't want to be the last white person in a street filling up with ethnic minorities but make sure that the same never hapens to them or theirs. When a white mother complains to the council that she wants a change of school for her son because he is the only white child in a class of 40 and is being picked on - she is labelled racist, even though the damn councillors make sure such a situation never befalls their child. Racism is everywhere if you want to call it such. How many of our mainstream party supporters, who call others racist, would have voted for Tony, if Cherie Blair (she hates being called that) had been black or covered from head to toe in black with just her eyes showing - I know, I would have preferred her like that as well - and so probably would Tony. But you get my drift? Is labour the true definition of racist for hating all us whities?

    Posted by Winston | December 29, 2007, 7:00 pm

22. He who hesitates, is lost. Don't flinch in the face of the institutionalised intimidation known as ‘political correctness'. The people with the real racist agenda, are those who want to take this land from us, because it's the most beautiful and fertile place on the planet. The Vikings couldn't do it, the Spanish couldn't do it, neither Napoleon nor Bismark nor Hitler nor Galtieri. Keep bloggin' away til your digits turn blue, Winston et al - the message is getting across, the sheep will awaken and remember who they really are, and begin to speak freely again as true British citizens. And spell ‘colour' correctly. The Free World is watching. Happy New Year! :)

    Posted by apendragon | December 31, 2007, 12:49 pm

23. By calling the BNP racists they think they will shut you up. well I'm glad to see a party with some backbone that wont shut up telling it as it is. Who else have we got in this country that will speak up for us. The thing that does worry me is that the message isn't getting out to enough people and when it does it gets twisted by the papers or the government. I see there is even a channel on the telly advising all these immigrants how to claim money and how to stay in the country and anything else they need to know. Can the BNP not get its own TV channel so that you can go out there and tell the country what is really happening in Britain; all the attacks that are racists against the whites could go on your news. They are getting more frequent now by Asians.

    One day soon when you're in power, I hope you remember all the things said and done to the legal BNP party, and all the people that have done this should stand charged with treason.

    Posted by ILOVEENGLAND | January 5, 2008, 9:28 pm

24. These days you cannot say anything without being “politically incorrect”. I think that other religions sometimes get too carried away. Prime example: Blackboard seen as offensive. It makes me laugh! People only say the BNP are Racists as the BNP actually want to keep Britain British! People need to understand the term RACISM instead of keep using this as an excuse when people have an opinion on the immigration rates of their country!!

    Britain now needs a right-wing approach to politics… the left-wing are weak and will do nothing to defend Britain from turning into a mass depression! There's only so long working men can pay to stay alive! I predict a mass depression in Britain in 2020

    GO BNP!!!!

    Katie, 16

    Posted by katie06715 | January 8, 2008, 6:10 pm

25. Every indigenous British person I have ever spoke to agrees with all BNP policies (however, many do not realise it). That is why the media and government employ every dirty trick, deception, lie, manipulation, to prevent our message getting out.

    Take the farce which was created by the media, politicians, etc about Nick Griffin speaking at the Oxford Union, surely if those opposed to the BNP believe that their arguements would defeat ours then they would relish to debate with us in public. The fact they don't want a debate is because they know once our message gets out (undistorted by the media) then we would win the next general election hands down. So instead they seek to silence us - to prevent our message getting out. We believe in democracy, those who employ gutter tactics obviously do not.

    The diseased media and the corrupt politicians who infest the House of Parliament have created an Orwellian thought crime - and it is called ‘racism' - a double speak. What exactly racism is will never be defined by the ‘powers that be' as it is their intention to keep it a vague term, applicable to their enemies and yet never applicable to their allies. Why can't indigenouos Brits have Music of White Origin or a White Police Officers group? Because, they will say with their forked tongues, it is racist for you to seek such organisations, yet it is a championed cause for any other ethnic group.

    People will police their own thoughts with with the newspeak of this politically correct age. Those in power (and the media) have ceased to represent the majority indigenous British person, instead they serve pay-masters for other reasons and in other lands. This is an age of great betrayal and monstrous deception.

    The BNP are the only hope for this land and it's people. Time for complacency is over, the time of wishless thinking has passed. The hideous intentions of those in power, the EU, the media and other dark forces force us to face reality square in the face and, as we have done before, we don our armour and gather our forces as we take the battle to them.

    The BNP will win and we will reclaim our land.

    Posted by magmell | January 9, 2008, 12:40 am

26. The BNP is not racist. It merely tries to protect a race of people. That's exactly what the government has forced down our throats for the past few decades with regard to other races. The BNP is simply doing the same. Good for it :) x

    Posted by MaidMarion1986 | January 11, 2008, 12:17 pm

27. There is a large membership website called Blackplanet. I notice there is not a equivelent called Whiteplanet. Perhaps white people are lacking in their own understanding or is it because is too Non PC.

    Posted by rogshar | January 13, 2008, 1:51 pm

28. Katie06715, you say that “Blackboard” is seen as offensive.

    But what about my rights? I'm offended by “whiteboards” (an unfortunate predicament, as I go to a college).

    If only the government would recognise my rights as a white person, I would get substantial compensation because I've been “deeply offended” by those evil, evil whiteboards.

    Yet again, the “government” have found another way to deposit the taxpayers money to the hands of minority of non-British people. By asking them to pretend that blackboards are offensive to them, and giving them the excuse to claim compensation.

    Posted by Daniel Owen | January 14, 2008, 5:24 pm

29. As an American, who has read many articles written by the BNP, I have concluded that the BNP is not racist; but, a political party defending it's constituents and their rights as British citizens. Logic dictates: If it is wrong to discriminate blacks, Asians, etc., is it not also wrong to discriminate individuals who support the BNP? There are plenty individuals who support the BNP but only a few of them support them by speaking out publicly and financially. If one believes he or she is being discriminated against, one should standup for one's beliefs. If one fails to do what is right, one should not complain. I wonder how many individuals, who say they support the BNP, fail to speak up publicly or financially help but only complain? Not many!

    Posted by Hiram-Abif | January 16, 2008, 2:07 am

30. Hiram-Abif: The ‘few' are becoming the ‘many', who as you point out, are the ones being discriminated against. Intellectually challenged (and politically motivated) conformists can and will continue to throw their standard insults at us; they choose to ignore their own capacity for rational thought, preferring to stay within the comfort zone of the politically correct. It's something to do with peer pressure, feeling safe by towing the line. That particular ‘comfort zone' is becoming less comfortable by the day. It's time to confront these issues in an adult, logical and informed way. A change is as good as a rest!

    Posted by apendragon | January 16, 2008, 6:25 pm

31. I'm appalled at what this country has become in the past 10 years under NuLabour–it is heading towards the gutter.

    Everybody I speak to has the problem of immigration at the top of their list of things they want to change about Britain, yet is handled with kid gloves by all parties apart from the BNP.

    When will we actually stand up to the PC brigade and stop being worried about being called racists? Well Britain the chance to actually say what you think behind closed doors is here!

    I would love to move to Australia but I would not get the required points scoring to get in.

    1. I have a house with over 120,000 GBP equity 2. I am from a catholic background 3. I have a family 4. I have never been out of work 5. I have saving plans and a pension 6. I do not have a skilled trade to offer to their country

    6. I DO NOT QUALIFY TO GET IN!!!

    Do I think Australians are racists? NO, and to be honest they do not give a toss if I think I do! I only wish Britain would adopt their policies and maybe I wouldn't want to leave our shores!

    When our country is equal to the rest of the world and we have nothing more to give, where will the 2nd generation of my family be able to migrate to for free housing, cars, social benefits, healthcare and a pension??

    thank god for the BNP - it gives me some hope for this once great nation.

    Posted by RJHSUSSEX | January 16, 2008, 11:13 pm

32. Apendragon: I hope your optimism about change (the €˜few' are becoming the €˜many') is on the increase. If one keeps his head in a hole and fails to pay attention and react accordingly, one will find not only his head in a hole but his whole body. I am not trying to offend the British society, but the British society, just like the Americans, are the cause and effect of their own problems. They allow people whom they know nothing about, to enter the society by the thousands; and, when these people get together collectively, they force change to fit their agendas (which are not British or American). The British, who the BNP represent, are individualists and therefore do not gather collectively. The BNP is the collective party who represents you and others like you but the party can't stand alone. It needs concerned citizens and the financial support. Without support, the party will fail.

    Posted by Hiram-Abif | January 17, 2008, 7:59 pm

33. Hi I'm Dan and I am 18 years old.

    Is the BNP racist? Haha (no).

    The BNP are nationalist and care about the white British people, and wants to make Britain Great again by cutting down on crimes amongst other things, and the fact of the matter is that too many people are comparing the BNP to Nazis, which is wrong because the BNP aren't running around trying to pull some stupid stunt called ethnic cleansing. This year I am old enough to vote and I will be voting for the BNP. If anything I have put in this comment is wrong please tell me!!!

    Many thanks. Good luck to the BNP!

    Posted by Dan | January 19, 2008, 2:01 am

34. Add to the list of organisations:- Glasgow based €˜charity', Positive Action in Housing. This €˜charity' was created 13 years ago to supply housing for the ethnic minorities. The €˜charity' is funded by the Scottish Government.

    Posted by MOVETHEMOUT | January 19, 2008, 9:37 pm

35. In Nottingham they are building something called ‘the new art exchange', a building comprising of art galleries/space, recording studios and facilities specifically for black and Asian people. Surely if I opened a similar building for white art I'd be called a racist? I applied for a summer school course at the old art exchange and I was rejected because of the colour of my skin. Buildings and services like these encourage segregation. Ethnic minorities bang on about wanting to be treated the same as everybody else, but they are the only people opening up centres and organizations specifically for people of their race. There is an other art centre due to open in Nottingham, for everybody, regardless or colour and creed, so why should there be another building that excludes a certain race, in this instance, white people? If it was the other way round it would be shut down before the plans had even been drawn up.

    Posted by tatie | January 22, 2008, 9:26 pm

36. There was time within living memory when most people scarcely ever thought about race.

    They didn't have to, because the country was racially almost totally homogeneous. If they ever did think about other races, it was to contrast the lot of the British with ‘less happier breeds' abroad. (Shakespeare of course, was a ‘racist')

    It is the greatest irony that nowadays we are forced at every turn to think about race, by the leftists who have imported millions of other races and forced them down our throats.

    When we were racially homogenous, there was no excuse for the whole panoply of political correctness. Now, with this dreadful ideology, we have become less free than at any time since the middle ages.

    ‘Racist' and ‘racism' are categories invented by the left as an aid to destroy our nationhood. The phrase 'stamp out racism' gives the lefitst game away - it assumes the leftist proposition that we are not ‘racist' by nature but by social conditioning.

    The reality, surely, is that we are ‘racist' by nature and that this tendency is reinforced by society.

    Posted by lance | January 23, 2008, 1:50 pm

37. Hiram-Abif: So where's the cheque? :)

    Posted by apendragon | January 24, 2008, 2:06 pm

38. Bukra: Without presuming to know what that website is, there is surely more than enough misinformation, disinformation, noninformation and downright lies about the BNP ‘out there' to keep any naive, gullible bigot happy and ignorant (and I don't mean that personally). The BNP can't be expected to provide anti-BNP links of questionable propriety from its own site. There are plenty of government grants floating about for all that rubbish. Kind regards.

    Posted by apendragon | January 24, 2008, 2:25 pm

39. “Racism”. Seems a pity, although I fully appreciate the need for it, that the BNP have to go on to the back foot when being accused of the only sin worse than murder. The only reason that such a non-concept has so much power is because those who use it are rarely made to explain how they are using it. On the rare occasions that this does happen the attempted explanation is completely pathetic and leaves the would-be witch slayer looking ridiculous. More seriously, self-serving and hate-filled anti-racist hypocrites are extorting a lot of money from a lot of good people with this nonsense. Of course, we all know all of this already. After all, this is a war you know!

    Posted by Tony Rogers | January 24, 2008, 7:00 pm

40. Evil BNP racists: the onus to explain how ‘racism' is being used is with the accuser - not the accused. You will fight your own straw man before an amused audience. Do not let them get away with this trick!

    Posted by Tony Rogers | January 24, 2008, 7:14 pm

41. How easy is it, for organised leftists and assorted anti-British groups, to conduct a campaign of disinformation featuring ‘BNP supporters' on this or that website? If the BNP resorted to that kind of tactic, it would be a betrayal of the values we fight for. I think our position is quite clearly shown in the article. THIS is the party website. Beware of imitations!

    Ed Says: Here, here! Well Said!

    Posted by apendragon | January 24, 2008, 9:18 pm

42. That is an excellent list. And, you're right, of course - none of those organisations are ever called ‘racist'. All the same, the actual question was: ‘Is the BNP racist?' In order to answer this question it doesn't help in the least to point the finger at Watford Asian Community Care, et al. It may provide a good diversion, but it doesn't give the answer.

    In the end, whether they are racist or not is no-one's concern except theirs. What is of interest to us, though, is whether THE BNP is racist - and it would help if this website, above all, was able to answer the question honestly. I think the answer must be yes.

    After all, what could more pathetic than a BNP councillor (I can think of one) going around saying: ‘I'm not racist, honest' (please don't hate me).

    I mean, if we're racist, we're racist. And I don't mean this in an unfriendly way at all…

    Posted by jeffreymarshall | January 24, 2008, 11:51 pm

43. Why cant we get away from this racist tripe and just accept that we all want our own country back to what it used to be. It sickens me to think that both my grandfathers were fighting in ww11 (1 lost his life!!) to save this country, only for the labour party to hand it over on a plate 60 yrs later. Its not about racism its about putting things right! British folk are treated as second class citizens in their own country. I have never voted BNP before, not even read any of their policies, but after 4 of my children have been mugged for their posessions ( 1 at knifepoint) I feel its time to make a stand, and the BNP seem to be the only party with the british peoples best interests at heart. I think if something doesnt give soon we will have a civil war on our doorstep….Thank you LABOUR party!!!!

    Posted by convertedlf | January 25, 2008, 4:08 am

44. Definition from dictionary .com

    “Racist”

    1.a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.

    2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.

    3.hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

    1)mentions inherent differences and cultural achievement-what is achievement and how is it measured?

    2)There is no doubt that present government is blatantly racist.

    3)As for hatred or intolerance-hatred no intolerance yes-why should we tolerate being forced to surrender our culture, heritage and identity so that the non indigenous can enforce their own upon us?

    In conclusion The BNP and it's members and supporters can only be as racist as the non indigenous people,who come here expecting to change this country to suit their own needs or indeed our own government who seek to give advantage to non indigenous peoples in respect of employment,benefits and housing,etc.Racism works both ways

    Posted by onetruebrit | January 25, 2008, 11:49 am

45. The next time someone insinuates that they know how I feel or what I believe, by way of the question ‘Are you a racist?', my answer will be something like this:

    ‘I do not have to answer that question, but I choose to reply that I am no more a racist than you are, friend, and possibly less so than you are.'

    I could add: So stick that in your politically correct pipe and smoke it! Friend.

    Posted by apendragon | January 25, 2008, 12:40 pm

46. Racism works one way. if only the rest of the nation would realise this.

    Posted by benham | January 25, 2008, 1:31 pm

47. Tatie, as regards your post on the 22nd of January and on the BNP being €˜racist' - The New Art Exchange you refer to was part funded by the New Deal for Communities Radford and Hyson Green which was awarded £55 million out of a £2 billion pound ODPM budget to regenerate the 39 worst deprived areas in the country. I was a democratically elected board director of this quango and I was bullied as I sat on the committee that approved 1.3 million of funds for this racist €˜target' funded scheme when I strongly opposed it. I asked if the organisation was New Deal for Black and Asian people or New Deal for Communities? I was branded a racist extremist for defending the whites who elected me, which I did at every possible opportunity, as with the €˜target' funded Ishango Science project which also excluded whites with no separate white after school club provided to facilitate the segregation agenda.

    Amongst other things, I questioned whether it was possible at this £55 million pound scheme for projects and subsequently €˜jobs' (oh they love those!), to be created on paper that didn't really exist, should people seek to ever siphon off community funds. It was confirmed by Louise Ross (HR) that there were no means to ensure that community projects were actually delivered as proposed hence the high staffing levels.

    Furthermore, as a student armed only with £17.50 in the bank, the scheme expelled me and a letter from Anthony Collins Solicitors (Birmingham) landed on my doorstep requesting £5K libel damages after I got frustrated with the shambles and took it up myself to send a rather injudicious email signed 'yours sincerely disgusted with the crooks' to board members with a copy to our then M.P, Alan Simpson who was stolen from us via a dodgy boundary change. Anyway, My findings were covered up in the Nottingham Evening Post by a full page advertisement the day after journalist Sean Kenny interviewed me at my house.

    Among my persecutors was a £70,000 a year chief executive who is a P.E teacher with an MBA (master of BS arts). He found it perfectly acceptable to defend corruption at that price. Now that he has been stabbed in the back and is the centre of a fraud probe do you he might think twice about doing it again? Read here:

    http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=195917&command=displayContent&sourceNode=134241&contentPK=19304767&folderPk=78486&pNodeId=133951

    http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=133965&command=displayContent&sourceNode=133948&contentPK=19599482&moduleName=InternalSearch&formname=sidebarsearch

    Luckily for you Tatie, another ex-NDC democratically elected director in Leicester, made a complaint to the CRE after being racially insulted as a Scotsman at his branch of €˜Nice Deal for Commuters' as we call it. They repeatedly told him 'Why should we help you'? And mocked him. What they didn't know was that they were secretly being filmed!!! Ha haha!!

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=tLcOiVH19oA&feature=related

    The Leicester Racial Equality Centre are so annoyed about being publically shamed via You Tube and my little bit of e-activism that they are taking my dissident friend to court:

    http://s259.photobucket.com/albums/hh297/cadurgedaily/

    And this is where you come in: Please send me any paperwork in relation to your discrimination at fleur@fleurwhite.co.uk so I can add it to my dissident friends bundle for his court case in a couple of weeks.

    If the BNP are racist then what about this evil ethnic Marxists and their PC £70k friend Sam Tarff who have persecuted me?

    Posted by Fleur White | January 26, 2008, 4:17 am

48. Personally, racism makes me feel sick. I don't understand it. It doesnt get us anywhere, it's pointless. LIFE'S TO SHORT TO HATE. and I am also a proud owner of a BNP membership, because apart from a few bad apples, I believe the majority of the BNP are good British people, fed up with being betrayed and lied to. We just need to get the message across that if you're interested in being racist, reform your views or don't join us.

    Posted by young_modern_nationalist | January 26, 2008, 8:55 pm

49. These black and asian organisations are not ‘racist' because,according to leftist ideology (which is pure hokum) ‘race' is a concept invented by the whites to keep other races in subjection. This begs the question as to how or why whites identified these others as races or even different in any way if they did not first exist as such in the the alleged thought processes of the whites. But never mind. Leftist thougnt is replete with such contradictions, although leftists seem to get along without noticing.

    Anyway, because racism is, according to leftists an invention of the whites to oppress blacks and asians, blacks and asians cannot therefore be ‘racist.'

    Of course, it's all nonsense, and completely ignores human nature, which is one area where human beings are (more or less) equal. Blacks and Asians are every bit as ‘racist as anyone else. Asians are for example ‘racist' about other ethnic groups in the Indian sub-continent, about blacks and about whites as well.

    Hence the oppression of the whites as second class citizens in their own country by their own government.

    To have one's country destroyed and one's people dispossed on the basis of this third rate thinking makes one weep.

    Posted by lance | January 27, 2008, 10:58 pm

50. This is my example of equal treatment

    —– Original Message —– From: Maria Segwai To: ‘ray_scot@talktalk.net' Cc: Anthony Robinson Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 11:57 AM Subject: RE: Equality Human Rights Commission

    Dear Mr Scot Thank you for your recent correspondence. Unfortunately, it is not possible for the EHRC to assist you further in this matter. Your case file is closed. You are advised to seek assistance elsewhere. Thank you for drawing our attention to this case. Yours sincerely Maria Segwai.

    From: ray_scot@talktalk.net [mailto:ray_scot@talktalk.net] Sent: 18 December 2007 23:38 To: Maria Segwai Cc: Denise Layne; Anthony Robinson Subject: Re: Equality Human Rights Commission

    Ms Segwai I am not happy to contact you but I am advice by CAB to contact you, I have further been advised by two other REC informing me that I should contact you. If the position remains the same treat this as a formal complaint. I wrote e-mails to many REC's around the UK instead of naming the Braunstone community Association (BCA) = company (A) and The Race Equality Centre (TREC) = Company (B) as I wanted to get impartial advice and I did. This is full e-mail I sent to all three: Dear Sir/Madam I hope you don't mind but I don't want to give you details of the companies involved, I just need advice to see if I have been discriminated against.

    REC response number 1: Having read Ray's email it would appear that he has a case to argue. If the discrimination is service related then Commission for Equality & human Rights will deal with it. Be happy to advice Ray if he needs further information.

    REC response number 2: Having looked at your correspondence and the facts provided it does appear that you have been put at a disadvantage and have been a victim of victimisation as understood under the Race Relations Act.

    REC response number 3: It does seem to be very strange that firstly you didn't get the apology, though depending on what was said and the level of evidence an apology should have been the very least you received. Did you seek any advice at the time from any other bodies such as CAB?

    It also seems odd that they would put the offender on the panel and not agree to help you. Ultimately it is very difficult to give advice and guidance with out knowing the full details of the situation. But on the face of what you have told it it does seem you have suffered victimisation.

    It is up to you how you take this forward. You can report it to us as a racist incident and we can investigate it for you if you like?

    To make very clear I have three separate answers from REC's in the UK who have come to the conclusion that the information I sent to them was enough for them to stated that I have been racial discriminated and victimised by company (B) which is The Race Equality Centre (TREC). The REC has made to clear that 'If the discrimination is service related then Commission for Equality & human Rights will deal with it.' Yet considering you have had a large amount of information from me where YOU can say it is discrimination you have failed to do that. I have to think that Commission for Equality & human Rights do not take a case on when the racial victims are the indigenous population of the UK white English, Scots and Welsh. Or is it the case that the Commission for Equality & human Rights will not take action against The Racial Equality Centre (TREC) because the staff are non white and the chair of TREC Mr Surinder Sharma of The Race Equality Centre (TREC) has connections as follows: €¢ Began his career with the Commission for Race Equality €¢ Commissioner chairman Equal Opportunities Commission

    So I ask you again to confirm whether in your opinion 'the Commission for Equality & human Rights' do you agree with the REC's answers to my e-mail I received that I been a racially discrimination against and a victimised victim as understood under the Race Relations Act.

    I also ask that the Commission for Equality & human Rights' reconsiders their decision not to represent me at the Nottingham County Court. I again ask you to represent me at the Nottingham County Court in my claim of racial discrimination and victimisation due to the actions of The Race Equality Centre (TREC) who are based at Leicester. To make I am willing not to pass this e-mail onto Government and MP's including the media providing that the Commission for Equality & human Rights give me proper advice and support that I am entitled to receive like any other ethnic minority. I believe I am entitled to expect the Commission for Equality & Human Rights to take my case up for me and to take action against The Race Equality Centre (TREC) at Leicester either through negotiations or civil court, I await your answer.

    Two Race Equality Councils support Mr Ross action of racial discrimination and victimisation against The Race Equality Centre (TREC) who is based in Leicester.

    On the 17 December 2007 AT 10.10 AM at the Nottingham County Court, Court room 5, The Race Equality Centre (TREC) was defending an action brought by Mr Ray Ross that TREC had racially discriminated and victimised Mr Ross.

    TREC's acting chief executive Mr Chino Cabon asked his honour Judge Inglis to: 1. Strike out Mr Ross's action against The Race Equality Centre (TREC) 2. Impose a gagging order on Mr Ross not to seek publicity or contact TREC's funders On both accounts his Honour Judge Inglis did not grant TREC's request.

    Mr Ross who was representing himself informed his Honour Judge Inglis that two other Race Equality Councils not in Leicester had stated that Mr Ross had a case to argue. Mr Ross told his honour he could not get legal representation in Leicester as there were conflicts of interest involved.

    His Honour Judge Inglis granted Mr Ross's request and gave him a date for the 15 February 2008 to get Legal representation to present his case against The Race Equality Centre (TREC) who are based in Leicester.

    Ray Ross Tel: 0116 289 2961 Mobile: 07809 338009 —– Original Message —– From: ray_scot@talktalk.net To: Maria Segwai Cc: Anthony Robinson ; Denise Layne Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 2:15 PM Subject: Re: Equality Human Rights Commission

    Dear Ms Segwai

    I am very disappointed that you have chosen to answer my e-mail dated 4 December 2007, as I understand it you should at least tell me if there was a potential discrimination case against The Race Equality Centre (TREC) at Leicester this you have chosen not to do. I have previous correspondence from the CRE where they did not take my case for being racial discriminated in 2004 but the CRE at least confirmed to me that it was racial discrimination. I ask you to confirm that Equality Human Rights Commission does not give advice on whether a person has been racially discriminated against or not. I take this opportunity to formally ask you 'Equality Human Rights Commission' to confirm that I have a case of racial discrimination against The Race Equality Centre Leicester; you are able to make that decision as I have sent you enough documentation. I do feel you are treating me like 'The Race Equality Centre (TREC)' Leicester in that by your refusal to give me answers amounts to racial discrimination and if I waited for an answer from before I take action I would be out time like what has happen to me already. I further believe your refusal to answer me is because the chair Mr Surinder Sharma of The Race Equality Centre (TREC) has connections as follows: €¢ Began his career with the Commission for Race Equality €¢ Commissioner chairman Equal Opportunities Commission I believe this is why Equality Human Rights Commission will not give me answers or advice, I believe had I been of a more publicised ethnic minority 'Scots' the Equality Human Rights Commission would have given me the support as a racially discriminated person should get. But obviously being a white Scot ethnic minority who lives in England we are ignored by organisations who received hundreds of thousands of tax payers money to promote racial equality and stop racial discrimination clearly in your eyes does not include the Scots so I supposed by the Equality Human Rights Commission attitude the English and Welsh will be treated the same?.

    Posted by Wallace | January 28, 2008, 2:35 am

51. for kla1987 and others.

    many good points in your entry kla which i assume is your initials and year of birth in which case you are twenty years of age.

    Some points in reply if I may.

    Racist as a word was devised by a communist in Russia as it suited them to be able to verbally attack those who opposed their views into silence.That succeeded and still does.

    Blood is thicker than water and people invariably prefer the company of their own kind.Sheep stick to flocks etc.

    As far back as Thomas More there was civil strife and petitions from those residents where large numbers settled from Europe and were refugees come here.More said look at it from their point of view.

    At that time the population of England was less than one tenth of the figure today.

    Thomas More was at the same time locking protestants into the torture room he kept in the cellar of his house.These were English protestants as opposed to those of the catholic faith he followed.

    These many people from abroad come here with their skills are they invited by future employers or are they here on spec'.

    There are rather more without skills come for any work they can get.

    None of them have to jump through hoops as we would if wanting to live overseas unless we have a wad of cash to spend there.

    The fact is racism does not exist in anything like the form it is portrayed as being in existence but it enables nationalism to be cloaked as racism.

    Nationalism in germany first enabled germany to rise out of the despair it was in over a matter of five years.In the same period of time in Russia Stalin did nothing like as much good.All his people got was ever more and more of F*** all.

    We drive in Volkswagons on dual carriageways both of which were the ideals of those nationalists.

    I do understand the points made by kla.

    He or she should bear in mind please that for many of us who,like me have lived for 60 years,and witnessed the decline of what was once a great country with a work ethic now driven out of so many of our young people that many now accept anything they are told.

    Experience will show you but unless nationalism is given a chance in 40 years time kla you may only have a memory of what life was like before in the world of Eurograd.

    people come here because they were not examined in any way and they heard it was good.

    People here have long now been told they are lower achievers than Indians or Orientals or anybody else.Quite how someone can believe that the children of an illiterate pakistani can be better then his/her defeats me but we have the media to blame for ever pushing the happy face of multi culturalism hence 85% of news presenters are foreigners.

    Posted by David Little | January 28, 2008, 11:47 am

52. The term ‘racist' is used by the left wing exactly as the word ‘Jew' was used by the Nazis - as an attempt to dehumanize their opponents in the eyes of society and thus remove their human rights as a prelude to oppression and indeed extermination.

    This is why we must identify exactly what they are doing and defy it with logic, passion, and even wit - by any means necessary!

    Pointing out blatant double standards as this article does is an excellent way to go about this.

    Posted by Karl Baxter | January 31, 2008, 2:48 pm

53. This is a prime example of this countries blind ignorance to the sinking ship that is Britain today! Labour have allowed such people residency to our country and now that we are being over run, we are not allowed to speak out!! With labour in the driving seat it has become very blatant that the only way to get anywhere in this country is to be of none british origin! This has gone on to long! This is a prime example of double standards, that ethnic minorities are allowed to critisize us and abuse us in anyway they see fit, but if we retaliate, we are branded racists!! It is about time we stood up for ourselves!

    Posted by Charlotte | February 1, 2008, 10:32 am

54. Just like many things handed to us in the last century, Racism is a representation of alien ideology. Racism is a made-up non-entity, a little like ”discrimination”. All things in nature discriminate -Lions mate with lions - elephants with elephants - bees with bees and on it goes. There is no difference in human nature. Jews marry Jews, Black Africans from certain tribes who emigrate here, only choose partners from that tribe, and catholics, Muslims and others, usually only keep with their own. Nature is being warped when it comes to white Britons and others in the west. ”Racism” was invented by Trotsky for destructive purposes, and it is working, but it is false, and not to discriminate is suicide. Intellectual arguments are what is needed to fight this alien silliness once and for all.

    Posted by BC1959 | February 3, 2008, 6:55 pm

55. Karl Baxter is making sense here. They (the media and the lefties) label the BNP as racists out of fear of what the party could achieve-the other parties simply dont want to accept this and so simply typecast an entire party. Its ridiculous but at the same time has been and will always be a main method in politics and society.

    Vote BNP.

    Posted by Jake | February 8, 2008, 10:28 pm

56. The left uses ‘racism' to shut down legitimate debate. It's a tried and tested tactic.

    I don't care, I want Britain to be for its indigenous inhabitants, for people who understand their obligations to one another as part of society, and not a country just for freeloaders fresh off the banana boat or Pakistan here to milk it for everything they can get.

    Posted by Proud tobeBritish | February 8, 2008, 11:00 pm

57. Even if it's true what those loones on the left insist on — even if the BNP is racist — so what?? It's nothing more than a temporary, designer term, a title given to those who do the right thing. Carry it like a badge of honor! It's a small price to pay for the great reward of the success of our cause! Be strong, and the right thinking will be avenged.

    Posted by Weythran | February 10, 2008, 6:09 am

58. Hear hear. Very good points there. I always thought about this myself. The same thing applies to other areas of social and community life as well. Furthermore all other European countries experience the same hypocrisy. It is the same people who aplaud those organisations and attend to their meatings with friendly handshakes and speeches who would be first to call a ” White Student Union” a racist organisation without hesitance.

    Marcelo

    Posted by ItalianBNPSupporter | February 11, 2008, 1:50 am

59. 1) Who exactly are the “indigenous British population”? Black and Asian people have been living here for hundreds and hundreds of years - Does the BNP support the “issues and concerns” of these British indigenous communities? how far back do you have to go to be “indigenous”? as far back as the Romans (Italians), Vikings (Danes), the Normans? (french/norse).

    2) I am a British/white member of one the the groups you list above. The organisation is inclusive to all ethnic groups - About half of the board and a good proportion of the community are also white/British. The group was brought about to discuss issues such as:

    Living in a multicultural society. Being British, being Chinese, and being European too?! Mixed marriages and inter-racial relationships. Mixed race identity. Artistic expressions - books / films / art / multimedia etc Community & Arts Are any of these issues racist?

    3) How many ethnic groups are represented on the BNP board? not many/none

    Clearly the BNP is disingenuous when raising the ‘we are not racist' angle when the reality is that the organisation IS fundamentally and profoundly based on a misconceived racist principle; the myth of the English Race.

    crab

    Posted by crab | February 11, 2008, 2:06 pm

60. “Black and Asian people have been living here for hundreds and hundreds of years “??????????? Do not make us laugh. There were a handful of black people here at the turn of the century look through any photo archive will confirm this. Has any one seen a British army of black people in photos in world war 1? ALL soldiers were WHITE. NO doubt the BBC and Lenny Henry can find ONE picture of a black man some where from that era, But you will NOT convince anyone else how ever much you try to scream and brainwash us

    Posted by x1 | February 12, 2008, 5:00 pm

61. Thanks for the List, I used it recently in the Telegraph.

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/ukcorrespondents/andrewmckie/feb2008/whatbritishlaw.htm?cmd=thanks#comments

    The Commies are usefull idiots, they don't realise that Communism is simply a stepping stone to World Domination by the ‘Elite' call them, Bilderbergers, the Illuminati, the International Bankers, whatever. Our Parliament is a charade, I've often wondered at Various politicians like Blair, How the hell has he got into no 10. Well its obvious, they are Puppets, they would never allow someone In no 10 of real intellect, someone who might care for Britain and the British People. Parliament, Westminster is a bought and paid for Front, the real Puppetmasters are hidden behind the scenes. http://www.savethemales.ca/000275.html

    Posted by royalecraig | February 12, 2008, 5:09 pm

62. 'Black and Asian people have been living here for hundreds and hundreds of years”

    You have been watching too much BBC TV. The way this organisation manages to import blacks and Asians (mostly blacks) into the most unlikely places is truly remarkable - an exercise in re-writing history so that the British people are dispossed of theirs.

    My favourite was the series on Casanova, the costume drama set in the 18th Century. According to this lying piece of BBC propaganda, blacks were to be found in the higher echelons of Italian society at the time. What complete and utter tripe. Or perhaps we are not supposed to notice that they were black? Either way their presence insults our intelligence.

    Queen Elizabeth 1 expelled all blacks from Britain, but there were undoubtedly some in Britain in recent centuries. Dr Johnson had a black servant. Hogarth depicted a black (making a pass at a white girl) in one of his paintings. But blacks (and Asians) were not common and outside London and one or two other ports were never seen.

    Strangers from anywhere were never seen in large parts of the country, so much so that (it is said) citizens of a town in the North East actually hanged a monkey during the Napoleonic wars thinking that is was Frenchman.

    The British were until very recently one of the most racially homogenous societies on earth.

    Posted by lance | February 13, 2008, 12:19 am

63. this is my first time on this site and i hope someone can relate or be educated by some of my views.in my youth growing up just outside n/london things where very different (and i'm only going back to the 80's.i could probably count 4 black or asian kids at my school.being raised from a family brought up in the east end it was only normal for me to be told to ‘nip round the paki shop' or collect the golly wog off of marmalade jars, which i still don't consider racist.i would love someone from the party to reply to me about this as i have lots to say on the subject.i am an ex soldier who has served in province and bosnia during the early 90's.i am already flustered trying to write this as like many proud english men i feel let down by those who are chosen to represent g.b for selling us out to the PC and HR scum. like i said first time on here and feel lost

    Posted by jwd | February 13, 2008, 3:41 am

64. I would rather say that the Brits are ethnically homogenous but sub-racially quite diverse. With subrace I am talking about different WHITE subraces. e.g. Wales, Cornwall and Devon are known to have large Atlanto-Mediterranean stock within the population stemming from the pre norman and anglo-saxon times. ( tall dark sea-faring types)

    While you have a very strong Anglo-Saxon and Viking proportion in East Anglia ( propably the BLONDEST area in Britain), Yorkshire and the Lake District.

    In the Middlands you find extremely large numbers of small build Alpionid types.

    Posted by ItalianBNPSupporter | February 13, 2008, 6:40 am

65. Well said lance. Hartlepool monkey hanging - http://www.thisishartlepool.co.uk/history/thehartlepoolmonkey.asp An understandable mistake……

    Posted by trueblueloyalist | February 13, 2008, 7:25 am

66. I recieved this e-mail recently and thought I would share:

    Very interesting reading!!

    Perhaps we should get rid of the term ‘racist' all together and just live our lives…

    Michael Richards better known as Kramer from TV's Seinfeld. This was his defense speech in court after making racial comments in his comedy act. He makes some very interesting points.

    “Proud To Be White

    Someone finally said it. How many are actually paying attention to this?

    There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc. And then there are just Americans.

    You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. You Call me ‘White boy,' ‘Cracker,' ‘Honkey,' ‘Whitey,' ‘Caveman' … and that's OK.

    But when I call you, Nigger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink … You call me a racist.

    You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you, so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?

    You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day. You have Black History Month. You have Cesar Chavez Day. You have Yom Hashoah. You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi. You have the NAACP. You have BET. If we had WET (White Entertainment Television) we'd be racists. If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists. If we had White History Month , we'd be racists. If we had any organization for only whites to ‘advance' OUR lives we'd be racists.

    We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce. Wonder who pays for that? A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but any color can be in the Miss America pageant. If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships you know we'd be racists. There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US . Yet if there were ‘White colleges' THAT would be a racist college. In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.

    You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists. You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug-dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.

    I am proud. But you call me a racist. Why is it that only whites can be racists?”

    There is nothing improper about this e-mail. Let's see which of you are proud enough to send it on.

    Posted by Hereward | February 13, 2008, 7:50 am

67. In response to CAT. Isn't it nice that we the BNP allow a dissenting voice on our web site unlike left leaning trotsky ones. But the real reasons that we allow this is , 1 to understand the way that our enemies think, and secondley to have a bloody good laugh. You see cat the difference between people that think like you and people that think like us is that the latter even though we detest the multiculti nightmare society we are forced to exist in still enjoy, A SENSE OF HUMOUR. Some thing which is probably an alien conncept to you and your fellow travellers, whom I am lead to believe are a fast dimminishing minority.

    Posted by baz | February 17, 2008, 2:20 pm

68. I have never really been interested in Politics, and today having had a very lazy day at work with little to do, I went researching teh candidates for the Mayor elections, and thus came upon BNP, always potrayed just as the title thread says “racist”. SO I've read on, and It is absolutely shocking, how can it be allowed that all these organisations are not branded racist and yet BNP is even though they all simply care for their own values! It really is sickening, from now on BNP have my full backing, I will always vote for you and I hope that every other British citizen has the common sense to do so as well, there is no way we can allow something like this to happen, we are being bullied in our own country, I am certainly not having this!

    Thanks for your support and welcome aboard, Pbar - Ed

    Posted by Pbar | February 19, 2008, 1:12 pm

69. I remember when i was at school, myself and my friends were having a day where we felt completely and utterly British, i believe it was the 2003 Rugby World Cup, we began to sing “Rule Britannia” and were quickly told to shut up.

    Yet other cultures were allowed their singsongs!!!

    Ihope this is something the BNP wish to address!

    Posted by The Brave Will Stand | February 23, 2008, 9:44 am

70. The BNP is not racist, it is culturist. Unlike multiculturalism, culturism recognizes that Britain has a majority culture and coherent history. Culturists, truthfully, acknowledge that Britain is not an Islamic state.

    Multiculturalists always underestimate diversity. Celebrate Diversity means we have to love polygamy and honor killings. Culturism takes diversity seriously. That is logical. The BNP is not racist, it is culturist. Racism is stupid, but culturism is necessary.

    Those who abuse the charge of racism to stop discussion need to be confronted. Race and culture are different. No BNP is not racist. But it cares about Britain's culture. It acknowledges that Britain has a culture. That is not racist, it is culturist.

    http://www.culturism.us

    Posted by culturist | February 23, 2008, 10:13 pm

71. culturist

    “It acknowledges that Britain has a culture”

    In his admirable book “English Music” Peter Ackroy explored the themes of history, culture and continuity.

    He put the following words in the mouth of Daniel Defoe:

    “To pallitate the shortness of our lives, and to compensate our brief term in this world, it is fit to have such an understanding of the times past that we may be considered to have dwelled in the same. In such a manner, answering the present with the past, we may live from the begining and in a sense be as old as our country itself”.

    This means our sense of identity is created by our intimate relationship with the history of our nation. It was our ancestors, people like us; who fought enormous odds at Crecy, experienced the exhilarating freedom of reading Tyndale's Bible for themselves, lit the Armada beacons, marched with Rifleman Harris and the 95th in the Peninsula, endured the bitter and brutal hardship of the early Industrial Revolution, forged the “Workshop of the World”, celebrated the Relief of Mafeking, created the NHS. These were our triumphs, our tragedies, of our people. It is only by such a consciousness that the covenant with those who have gone before, and those who will follow us, can be forged. And if there is no such covenant, to to do our utmost to leave the country perhaps a little better than we found it, then we are living ephemeral lives in the present, which are completely meaningless. I am afraid we see this all round us at the moment.

    History and culture are inextricably intertwined and it is also cultural continuity that enables us to “live from the begining and in a sense be as old as our country itself”. When I listen to the music of Byrd, Tallis, Purcell, Vaughan Williams, Britten, Jethro Tull, Badly Drawn Boy, June Tabor my ear detects similar qualities. I hear a gentle, wistful music, full of melody, thoughtful, at times earthy and lively, at times sad, distinctive, fully expressive of the land and the best qualities of its people. This is a great base on which to build, and I get the same sense from reading Thomas Hardy, the Dorset poet who recreated an historic Wessex out of his experience and imagination. And I ask myself can we not do the same for the indigenous peoples of these islands with all the materials at hand capable of being forged into a revived national consciousness?

    Truly we have sold our birthright for a mess of potage, literally in the case of chicken tikka masala which the late lamented Robin Cook was pleased to describe as the national dish. Surrey Trading standards found that “Fifty-eight out of 102 chicken tikka masala samples contained “illegal and potentially dangerous” levels of colourants”(BBC). This is not a bad metaphor for the pernicious doctrine of multi-culturalism which the current Pope has accurately described as “turning one's back upon one's own”. When mass immigration/multi-culti advocates are asked what are the actual benefits of enrichment it never seens to get much further than curry. Black music as pumped out sounds to me discordant, mindless, repetitive and schizophrenic for the most part, certainly of little or no cultural worth. It really is a bit of a struggle to see “enrichment” in any positive light, try as one might.

    In his other excellent book, “Albion”, Ackroyd lists approximately 200 writers, artists, composers and architects - English, Scots, Welsh and Irish - who have pretty much created our national high culture. The first on the list is the Venerable Bede whose “Ecclesisatical History of the English People” has been described as the founding document of the English nation, though thanks to our de-education system and the multi-culturalists who infest it I believe I am on firm ground in asserting that Bede is unknown to all but a relative handful. There are no candidates for outstanding cultural achievement on Ackroyd's list who were born after 1945 though I would accept that such an exercise is inevitably subjective. But think on that for a moment! If mass immigration, multi-culti and diversity were so great should there not have been numerous stellar cultural contributions resulting from the “vibrant”, “heady” cultural mix the propagandists tell us is so wonderful? Shouldn't cultural “fusion” be wowing us and knocking us dead left, right and centre? Phoney Snake Oil salesman Tony said a while back that Britain is undergoing a “cultural renaissance, never knowingly undersold on the hyperbole was Tone, but then he rather gave the game away by stating that the heart of the alleged Renaissance lay in the nation's museums.

    We cannot overcome this sterility, and put to rights the nihilistic despair of our young people, unless we heed the Pope's advice and stop turning our back on our own history and culture, but turn back to it without delay!

    Posted by neversurrender | February 24, 2008, 11:35 am

72. Are you serious. Every single one of you are filthy racist and should be ashamed, you all seem judgmental and I must say I would kill myself if I had the beliefs of any of you morons. Being new to this country from the U.S, it makes me want to go back and I know you people are so quick to say,”Go back to you're own country!” You guys are like the trash of the U.S I am embarrassed for you!

    -

    Oh dear! - Ed

    Posted by youknowwho | February 28, 2008, 1:21 am

73. “Are you serious.”

    In a word yes, your little outburst cannot go without a response.

    In Britain alien third world populations have been imported over the last 50 years, notably Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and Somalis, who are generally of very low economic and cultural worth and utterly incompatible with us. It is calculated that during the coming century, we, the indigenous people, will become a minority in our country. Given the intrinsic nature of the migration and high breeding rates (and of inbreds in the Pakistani case), this can only result in a failed state hell hole if matters are allowed to go on are they are. If you had taken the trouble to find out a little more you would have known that mass immigration in this country has taken a different course to that in the USA, which has not imported Muslim villagers from such primitive backwaters as Mirpur, although I gather in the States immigration is a deeply controversial subject. Why should we allow ourselves, who have populated our lands for thousands of years, to be dispossessed and destroyed ?

    There is nothing to recommend these people and some of them want to kill us:

    “Another preacher says: ‘The time is fast approaching where the tables are going to turn and the Muslims are going to be in the position of being uppermost in strength and, when that happens, people won't get killed - unjustly.'.”

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/jan/07/broadcasting.channel4

    And as I said above the sum total of cultural “enrichment” in return appears to be curry, not much of a return looked at logically for people who are not merely dangerous and alien but are also a massive economic drain upon our country, Britain, which is clearly flagging economically anyway.

    “Enrichment” is now a word which is now usually employed in a pejorative sense. However when I read War and Peace and Crime and Punishment this was a genuinely enriching experience which made me think a lot about about human behaviour and the nature of history. However to gain this personal enrichment it was not necessary for Britain to be colonised by Russians. Why then should it be a good thing to be colonised by backwater Pakistanis who appear to have little or no high culture at all?

    Finally I would like to have a look at this whole idea of “racism”, which the liberal left forever throws in our faces and which they use in pursuance of their mad schemes to destroy our historic nation.

    Now the term “racism” as formulated was one side of an equation to whit:

    Racism = Prejudice plus Power.

    This cant formulation was concocted in order to show that blacks couldn't be racist, because they didn't have any power.

    But it is abundantly clear that the vast majority of the indigenous population doesn't have any power either, because otherwise how come we have been lumbered with mass alien immigration that we never consented to, nor ever would?

    Britain is a kind of ancient regime with a Constitution “sent into this breathing world scarce half made up, and that …lamely and unfashionable” - that's from Richard III if any member of the lib left rabble is reading this, because disconnected as they are from our history and culture they can't be expected to know.

    Britain is not a democracy. The Prime Minister exercises enormous patronage power inserting his creatures to the very depths of the political system like some 18th century monster of “Old Corruption”. Iraq showed Cabinet government to be a mere cipher. Most grotesque of all is the voting system which gave the vile Labour faction a 69 seat majority in 2005 which was a farce because they got this on the basis of 21.69% of the total electorate voting for them. In a recent poll it emerged that 83% of respondents had no trust in politicians at all and only 4% thought they put the national interest first. This is a liberal oligarchy, it is no democracy.

    But then if the people have no power, and going back to the “racism” formula, how then can we be “racist”? In short we can't, it is a a meaningless piece of abuse flung at us by traitors.

    Forget “racism”, think SURVIVAL!!

    Posted by neversurrender | February 29, 2008, 12:30 pm

74. Is the BNP racist?

    That we have to answer this question is indicative of the problems that we face because it is not a question that would ever be asked of any of the thousands of charities and organisations that represent people from other ethnic backgrounds. If it is not racist for others to look after their own, why should it be considered racist for us to do the same? The racism is in the accusation - not in our good intentions. We should be judged as others are judged and not be subject to double standards.

    Posted by Shropshire Lass | March 2, 2008, 11:04 pm

75. Just a few words to “You Know Who”. you say you might come back to the US, feigning mock outrage at the attitudes of members of BNP. Funny, but I believe you remember Mr. Jesse Jackson, Mr. Al Sharpton, Mr. Louis Farakan, Mr. Ted Kennedy, et al. You remind me of the man without a country.

    Well, I have my country, and consider it more than worth fighting for. I'm not moving anywhere, except to be in the face of people with attitudes such as yours. My children and grandchildren have been schooled in the appropriate manner, i.e. love for our Constitution, and it's Bill of Rights, Liberty, Freedom, and a belief that national government's obligation to it's citizens is to protect them from enemies both within, and without.

    We are proud of our British ancestors, and of their history. Let not that history be rewritten, let not it diminish itself from within, let it be what it has always been: A beacon of light for those who seek it's inviting allure. However, let those who come, do so with a firm resolve to assimilate into the long established order of things. To do less, is to confirm radically different intentions, wouldn't you say?

    Sorry, my British brethren, you have “You Know Who”, hopefully he/she won't return to the land of his original roots. Do your best to educate him/her, for we here in the US obviously have failed. Something we do with great facility these days.

    Posted by stevesenior | March 3, 2008, 5:21 am

76. How on earth can the BNP be called racist? Taking pride in Britain is no form of racism, and wanting a country within which the major cities are not filled to the brim with other ethnic minorities is simply common sense. What kind of welcoming would we get if we were to step into various Eastern European countries, various African countries? More often that not, the British get a terrible reception when they emigrate, yet other ethnic minorities walk into our country, head held high, and they don't pay taxes and most certainly do not abide with British culture and tradition. Something needs to be sorted and the BNP are the only people capable of doing so, as sadly, the Labour Party and the Conservative Party for a start, are far too wussy to do so.

    Posted by donnieuk | March 3, 2008, 10:13 pm

77. I do not believe that I am Racist. I currently serve in Her Glorious Majesties Armed services, yet with the up and coming St Georges day I will not be permitted to fly the flag in my barrack block window as it may cause offence to the non-british nationals that work on the base. How can I be branded racist for being patriotic? I have fought for the rights of others in the Balkans, Iraq and recently in Afghanistan, who is going to fight for my rights to fly a simple flag? This country needs the BNP. Not tommorrow, NOW! Also to show true allegenceto the BNP I have a private plate for sale as I am no longer allowed to take my vehicle onto military bases with it on so. L*** BNP is yours for £800 and it comes with a free Vauxhall Omega and brand new MOT. I know this isnt the place to sell but it's got to go.

    Will also be interested to see how this White Britain season will be on the bbc.

    Posted by RedWhiteandBlue | March 7, 2008, 2:57 pm

78. I recently heard that foreign prisoners are being offered thousands of pounds to go back to their own country. So if this is the case, does this mean that more and more are going to commit a crime and get offered thousands to get sent home? In this case they're having a holiday and getting paid for it.

    A Question to the person whose idea this was. Who says that this person, who has made his/her way into our country, won't be back in 6 months because he/she has spent their (our tax payers) money?

    DARE I ASK WHO IS IT THAT IS GOING TO PAY EACH ONE THIS RIDICULOUS OFFER TO COMMIT A CRIME? (Yes, You the tax-payer!)

    I think it is TIME to stand up for our country and to think of our grand-children and their grand-children and what's best for us. There's a saying: “charity starts at home”. I for one know who I'll be voting for in this coming election. It's time to look after number one.

    Posted by The Underdog | March 8, 2008, 10:45 pm

79. Please remove the Jewish ones from that list: Judaism is a religion, not a race.

    Posted by sam | March 11, 2008, 10:17 pm

80. I agree that looking out for one's own is not at all racist…especially in one's own land.

    However I do wonder what the BNP's policy is on people who are partially descendant of native British stock but who are fully supportive and integrated of their culture…are mixed people (like Churchill whose grandmother was Iroqois) considered British by the BNP? How do we define Britishness?

    - Re the Iroquois story, this is believed, now, to be a myth for several reasons: http://www.winstonchurchill.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=103 -Ed

    Posted by HenryMorgan | March 12, 2008, 6:58 pm

81. For the first time in my life (I'm 70+), I decided not to listen to the chancellor's Budget. I've listened attentively every year for more years than I can remember, hoping for good news. I've finally realised there isn't any. Still I have a hope: that we one day have a government which will tackle the towering problems we face, such as the over-population of this tiny island, and the drain on our depleted reserves in maintaining the pretence that we're still a superpower. There has to be another way. Let's follow a famous Abolition with another: the Abolition of Immigration. Let's drop the white man's burden and the pretence that we have an obligation to sustain peoples that actually hate us. Do we need more immigrants in the UK? Does India really need a handout from the UK? Is there a politician that can see further than the next election? When I hear of real, life-changing policies, I'll keep listening. Till then, I'll listen to the consistent message from the BNP, because the BNP is the authentic voice of millions of Britons. Keeping quiet can cost you your country.

    Posted by bamford | March 12, 2008, 8:31 pm

82. The BNP will always be branded as racists, simply because they're a threat to other political parties, not to mention the hundreds of thousands of immigrants who are riding on the gravy train.

    I don't believe for one minute that the BNP are racist, but only the voice of the true British people.

    The BNP are a patriotic political party who have clear cut policies, not the hypocritical Labour/Conserative corrupt parties who have watered down policies to appease the majority of voters just to stay in power.

    Where we stand today is in the land of the true British people, a small, but beautiful country that our ancestors and forefathers have fought and died for.

    Until the BNP are voted into power, the country will only continue to be treated as a free meal ticket for anyone who steps over into our borders.

    Posted by Infiltrator_2K | March 12, 2008, 10:13 pm

83. we shouldn't involve ourselves in discussions like this .It's a”when did you stop beating your wife” type of question which always puts us on the defensive,as it is meant to do.If our enemies throw this trotskyite boo-word at us we should simply reply that we are racial nationalists “and if that means that we are what you call racists, then tough”

    Posted by jrb | March 13, 2008, 3:28 am

84. “We shd. offend Liberals, also sentimentalists.” http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2007/aug/06/past.politics

    This short article is well worth a look because it demonstrates that, contrary to received opinion, the British government didn't want the invasion either. They fought shy of nipping this tragedy for our people in the bud, because otherwise they “should offend Liberals and sentimentalists”. This is an all-time pathetic excuse of course. Churchill said in 1954 that, “But it wd. be fatal to let it develop too far.” Too right: it has been absolutely fatal, but at that time Churchill was 80 and his powers were fading. The rest of the government comprised the usual weak, vacillating crew who sat on their collective hands and did nothing at all effective–the same sort of easy crew who later engineered Enoch's Shadow Cabinet departure. But it is on these illegitimate “foundations” that mass immigration into Britain came to pass. The subject is very well dealt with in Andrew Roberts book “Eminent Churchillians.”

    Posted by neversurrender | March 14, 2008, 10:02 am

85. Thank God someone has addressed this issue. I've been going on about this for years. This is were we need to stand up and say NO!! Enough is enough, lets have National Whites Day, lets have the WOBO's, lets fly our St George's cross with pride for FOOTBALL/RUGBY events!! None of this means we're racist, it means we have British Pride! If we'd have marched against a cartoon with pickets saying such awful and hateful things like the Muslims did we'd have all been locked up and called bigoted racists… We are losing this battle and its the do-gooder MPs that are losing it for us. I for one am sick and tired of it. And for one last rant, please check out a song called ‘Sun Vs Moon' by Sage Francis, in it he sings the line ‘The devil is the ****** White Man…' now if I was to sing a line stating the devil was a black man there'd be uproar! And this song was released on Warner Records!! Please feel free to respond to this e-mail: captainlarge@hotmail.com Good Day My Friends =)

    - Welcome onboard, Cap'n-Ed

    Posted by martynedge | March 15, 2008, 9:40 am

86. “Nospam”: Predictable and tedious liberal claptrap that treats left wing lies as indisputable fact. “…the country is not all white and hasn't been for hundreds of years.” So it's only a mere 99.9% white then. The vast majority of Brits don't “…go to watch the commonwealth games.” So how can this be used as an accurate indicator to gauge the opinions of a nation of 60 million?

    Posted by the likes of us | March 15, 2008, 1:32 pm

87. “Nospam”: “…some (Brits) don't want to eat or even try the native food.” Really?! Have you told the police about this? “…and want fish and chips in Spain.” How dare they! None of that over here though–every south Asian immigrant happily tucks into a good beef roast every Sunday. “You state quite a number of mainly black organisations without stating the aim of these organistaions.” Well, I'm no expert, but I would think the aim is probably to promote that particular ethnic group–a bit of what this party does.

    Posted by the likes of us | March 15, 2008, 1:43 pm

88. “this country is not all white and hasn't been for hundreds of years.” - according to nospam. Really? Even the BBC doesn't claim this, and if they could, they surely would:

    “Approximately 14,000 black people lived in England by 1770.”

    “In 1945, Britain's non-white residents numbered in the low thousands. By 1970 they numbered approximately 1.4 million - a third of these children born in the United Kingdom.”

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/uk/2002/race/short_history_of_immigration.stm

    This statement (this country is not all white and hasn't been for hundreds of years) is profoundly dispiriting on several grounds. If it had been made 30–let alone 60–years ago it would have greeted with utter derision by all native Britons. That it could be made at all is a small demonstration of the rootlessness of a fractured society where historical memory is very imperfectly transmitted between generations over a period which should lie well within that memory. It is a telling indictment of an educational–more properly a de-educational–system where every month is Black History Month, and which deals in propaganda, not history, deliberately conveying a quite mendacious impression of the historical nature of British society. We have, in point of fact, never been so well-favoured with regard to access to information. And it should be the work of a few moments to discover the truth that Britain has been remarkably homogeneous–and white–until very recent times. However the liberal-left prefer their article of multi-racial faith, they prefer to chant their “nation of immigrants” mantra even though this is nothing but a tissue of falsehoods and deception. This amply demonstrates a complete want of intellectual honesty and rigour, and a stupefying ignorance, on their part. A society where such absurdity can be given credence is wide open to demagoguery, breakdown and disintegration. It is highly vulnerable, the castle wall having been breached, to even further incursion by cohesive alien groups who do go to the trouble of transmitting their historical memory.

    Posted by neversurrender | March 15, 2008, 5:42 pm

89. It doesn't matter how many non-Europeans there were in Britain hundreds of years ago–we can even find evidence of non-European Romans here (some in positions of authority). It's a ploy to detract from the native culture and its pre-eminence throughout history in th British Isles. This goes far beyond race–it affects the very way we think. British history has always had ethnic diversity (perhaps explaining why few Brits are inbred), but that does not mean Britons must now submit to unwelcome and often regressive cultures that are being plugged as equal to our own–aside from Europe, only the Far East has developed independent high culture, art, and philosophy. Something I love to tease Muslims with is how their minarets and domed mosques were direct copies of Byzantine Roman architecture!

    Posted by HenryMorgan | March 15, 2008, 8:11 pm

90. doyouknowwhat that doyouknowwho needs to do? Quote: “I would kill myself if I had the beliefs of any of you morons.” He needs to start believing in the truth that the BNP stands for - but then he would have to kill himself, wouldn't he?

    Posted by Winston | March 15, 2008, 10:22 pm

91. Quote: 'I would kill myself if I had the beliefs of any of you morons.'

    Really? You'd rather die than face the truth? Why is that? Don't bother answering …..

    Here's some truth - http://tottenhamlad.blogspot.com/2008/03/savage-path-from-knoxville-to-tottenham.html

    Still alive? What was it - refused to read the article or haven't the courage to do the deed? I think we all know the answer …..

    http://www.uktabloid.co.uk/Main%20News.html

    Posted by Dylan | March 15, 2008, 10:36 pm

92. Slightly off-topic, but prompted by a contemptuous remark above about fish and chips, it is a fact that the UK was helped out in both the First and Second World Wars by its access to fish supplies, which helped stave off the starvation which was widespread in landlocked countries. I admit that potatoes are an import from South America - though I'd guess the people who tell lies about Britain, as being an outcome of continuous immigration, would be unlikely to know even such a simple fact as that.

    Posted by RW | March 15, 2008, 11:20 pm

93. you disgust me.

    -

    Very impressive. It must have taken you a while to compose such a complex argument.

    Now read this - http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/03/17/indigenous-people-attacked-by-government/ - Web Team

    Posted by AJ Flaps | March 17, 2008, 2:07 pm

94. You people clearly care deeply for our countries history. One million Indian VOLENTEERS fought on our side in the first World War, from a tiny army far smaller. India is our greatest friend, and we wouldn't have won that war without them. Surely they have a right to live in our country, if history is what we are basing this on?

    Posted by sam | March 25, 2008, 8:58 pm

95. Why is this argument based on history … SAM ?… The debate is NOT about whether “a million Indian volunteers” or their descendants should be allowed to live here, [WHY CANT THEY LIVE IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY?]. The debate is about the FUTURE of the indigenous population, [White British}, who are in danger of becoming a minority in our OWN Country, and how the BNP is castigated and branded racist for speaking up about it! We've got MILLIONS of immigrants here, who now rely on schools, hospitals, social security, houses, jobs…THAT SHOULD BE GOING TO BRITISH PEOPLE. They have more rights here than we do, AND,we were NEVER asked IF we wanted them here in the first place…Then there are the Law Breakers among them,the prisons are full to bursting! Its now costing MILLIONS,in translation costs…and THEY don't belong here in the first place! This is OUR Country …. I'm sick to death of listening to the lefties “racist”chants … and Im sick to death of the LABLIBCONS who are destroying my Country……… I want MY Country back! VOTE BNP.

    Posted by RedWhiteAnBlue | March 26, 2008, 1:52 am

96. “You people clearly care deeply for our countries history.”

    It is nice to hear that acknowledged, sam. We do indeed care for our country's history, its present, and above all - its future.

    “One million Indian VOLENTEERS fought on our side in the first World War, from a tiny army far smaller. India is our greatest friend, and we wouldn't have won that war without them.”

    Nationalists pay tribute to the brave efforts of Indian soldiers in the wars our country has been involved in. However to talk of the Indian contribution as decisive is unhistorical. The war was essentially won on the Western Front and here the most notable Empire contributions were made by the Australian and Canadian divisions. particularly in the 100 days leading to the Armistice. The motives of the Indian volunteers, mostly engaged against the Turks, were presumably mixed, including loyalty to King-Emperor, martial tradition and no doubt pay.

    Likewise in the Desert in WW2 Indian troops played a very valuable role against Rommel and in the defence of India against the Japanese. But history should never be seen in an unnuanced way. The historian Correli Barnett considered that the cost and effort of equipping the Indian army was a substantial drain to the British war effort, an offset against its battlefield achievements. More significantly perhaps the Japanese recruited, mainly from Indian prisoners taken at Singapore, an Indian National Army of approximately 40000 strong, which fought with the Japanese against the British Indian army when they tried to invade India in 1944.

    Although militarily the efforts of the Indian National Army ended in fiasco and defeat neverthless their very existence, and the support they had within India itself, made the British doubt the loyalty of their Indian soldiers. This led directly to the 1947 scuttle and the tragic communalist slaughter of that year. Post war those Indians who fought on the side of the Japanese, and to a lesser extent the Germans, have tended to be honoured as patriots, whilst the troops who fought for the Raj have been neglected.

    “Surely they have a right to live in our country, if history is what we are basing this on?”

    The historical record hardly seems to confer such a right. We paid our dues to India by granting Independence. And by defending India from the Japanese whose contemporary savagery in China was one of history's worst barbarities. Generally I would counsel against simplistic interpretations and conclusions drawn from history. Our liberal-left opponents tend to do this with World War 2, which they see as an unnuanced “anti-fascist” struggle, on which basis the British people are supposed to have signed up unconditionally. This is by no means the case.

    Finally British nationalists do not object to Indian people living in Britain, what concerns us greatly is that we what see is a colonisation event by Muslims from Pakistan and Bangladesh most particularly. We are simply not prepared to become a minority in our own country. Who would?

    Posted by neversurrender | March 26, 2008, 11:30 am

97. Watch the Geert Wilders movie here - http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/2008/03/fitna.html

    Then this - http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=2668560761490749816

    Then this - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QygwC7S2iEY

    Is the BNP “waysist”?

    Stll thinking of voting for the liblabcon/islam “enrichment” party?

    Posted by baccy_tin | March 28, 2008, 3:28 pm

98. These are 32 non-political organisations offering support to people. They have valid and logical reasons for doing what they do in ways which concentrate on particular communities. They aren't trying to do this at the expense of any other community and they aren't covertly encouraging people with low IQs to assault anyone.

    I've only looked at the first 3 but it seemed like a waste of time to carry on any further.

    - Many of these organisations are VERY political! BUT.. does it not strike you as “odd” that there is no “National White Police Association”, no “White Londoners Forum”, no “Federation of White Housing Associations? Maybe you can answer us-Why IS that the case?-Ed

    Posted by whitesalright | April 1, 2008, 10:56 pm

99. I echo whitesalright's opinion. To attempt to draw comparisson between the BNP - a political organisation which seeks to govern the ENTIRE population of Britian, in its current multicultural state - and organisations whose only desire is to support particular ethnic groups is utterly ridiculous. The organisations listed are in no way racist because they don't seek to remove the rights or attack the beliefs of other cultures/ethnic groups/relgions. This is in contrast to the BNP whose manifesto and literature have the underlying purpose of doing so. Perhaps the BNP, instead of seeking to govern Britian, should abandon the political route and become a support organisation for white people's needs in all areas of life. This surely would solve your problem ed?

    Posted by twosidestothestory | April 5, 2008, 3:22 pm

100. The reason they are not seen as racist is because they encourage their own race but not in the expense of others (i.e. no fly zones)

     Posted by kad123 | April 5, 2008, 4:24 pm

101. twosidestothestory “…in its current multicultural state…” - a Freudian slip perhaps?

     “The organisations listed are in no way racist…in contrast to the BNP…” - you can spend hours spouting sophistry but what your post amounts to is essentially white=bad and black/ethnic=good.

     Also there is a fundamental difference, immigration was/is imposed on this nation against the will of the people. The BNP are a British organisation fighting the corner of its indigenous population. I bet you wouldn't dare infer that the ANC or the Dalai Lama are racists for doing the same. How about that for twosides?

     Posted by the likes of us | April 7, 2008, 3:44 pm

102. Twosides, perhaps you don't get the meaning of ‘indigenous'. Now, If the BNP was seeking political power in Zimbabwe (whose people happen to be black), or Iran (who happen to be non-white), or China (who happen to be non-white), I could understand your point, however they aren't. Perhaps you should take a look at Operation Black Vote for instance, it says on its opening page “the home of Black Politics”. Wouldn't you say that's a political aim? What about the Muslim Council of Britain? Do you realise that islam is also political? So what you are basically saying is that the indigenous population (which happen to be white) have no say or place in their own country? the BNP are NOT against immigration if it is controlled, and immigrants that come to Britain regardless of colour will have to muddle along with the rest of us and abide by British law.

     If the British were such nasty people, we wouldn't need immigration controls because no one would want to come here to live!

     Posted by bertie bert | April 14, 2008, 4:21 pm

103. It's worth recalling how we got into this tragic disaster in the first place. As the link above shows (14/03/08) the supine government of the day was afraid that: 'We shd. offend Liberals, also sentimentalists.' One such was Lord Pakenham, who reckoned we should let them all in because: “We as Christians are all in the position of the Good Samaritan - everyone is our neighbour.” Lord Pakenham later became Lord Longford, Myra Hindley's best friend. Out of such deluded, absurd fatuity did the liberal elite sleepwalk into the nightmare.

     Trouble is, they dragged the rest of us into Freddy Kruger's lair with them….–Ed.

     Posted by neversurrender | April 18, 2008, 6:35 pm

104. Loved that email you posted Hereward. The above list Nick wrote is just incredible. How dare they call and pidgeon hole ‘whites' as racist. Full stop. How dare they. Who on earth do they think they are to choose who and who isnt or cant be called a racist. They are betweent hemselves the most racist of all. And classist. If they can give their oponion and insult at the drop of a hat then they should be able to take what theyreceive from those they insult and expect for people to get angry and defend themselves. How on earth can people not see these things happen!!! I am baffled. Really really baffled.

     Posted by ljohnson | April 27, 2008, 10:02 am

105. I believe in everything that the BNP has to say whether a few retards think it's racist or not. It isn't whether the BNP is racist, it's whether the BNP's policies are right. The answer to that is yes. They say that the BNP has been exposed, but during the video I found nothing that would deter me from my faith in the BNP for a better tomorrow. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqI2kKX2c_c&NR=1

     Posted by lawlesss | April 28, 2008, 9:07 pm

106. I am a bit peeved that black people in a friendly manner can use the N word, however I cannot laugh about labelling people ‘honkys'

     —- It's a rule that only works one way, DP. - Ed.

     Posted by Denzel Patel | April 29, 2008, 10:58 pm

107. I am an Italian national living, working and paying taxes in this country for nearly 18 years. Wife and kids are British. I have recently come across your party manifesto and I have to agree with a lot of your policies and statements. This country has been ruined by illegal immigrants and too much inappropriate tolerance in the name of some ridiculous political correctness. The result is more problems for honest, hard-working people and more rights for criminals. I do not think BNP is racist although not being British myself I am probably not the kind of person you will want in your party. I will however vote for you on 1st May and hope that you will be able to rid London of so much ‘rubbish' and make it a more livable city as it used to be. With admiration and support.

     —– Thank you, friend, for demonstrating the difference between genuine, controlled immigration and manipulated mass invasion and attempted cultural genocide. I've just been listening to some Rossini overtures, as it happens. - Ed.

     Posted by marcoma | April 29, 2008, 11:22 pm

108. Hi I'm Oli, aged 19 from cheshire. I'm lucky to live in a predominantly white area. I don't believe the BNP is racist, but we are nationalists and the reality is, if the immigrants of Britain don't like it, they can go back to their own country. In my lifetime all I have seen is the government run by Labour or conservative (mostly labour). I want to see a dramatic change in our society and for us all to be happy and to feel looked after. Why shouldn't we be first? This is OUR country and ours it should be; we're not racists, we're realists.

     -

     Hi, Oli, Spread the word, comrade - Ed

     Posted by omercer1 | May 1, 2008, 12:25 am

109. Hi, I'm David 23 from Essex. I'm mixed race (African / English). I was born and raised in the UK and have never known different, and have been bought up around traditional British values. I try to maintain a very open mind taking into account as many views as I can.

     I am classed by white people as being ‘black' and by black people as being ‘white', which leaves me in a ‘grey' area.

     The issues within the racism row are definitely bi-directional, I know people that are white and anti-black, Muslim, Islamic, etc (but apparently I'm different) and blacks that are anti white, etc. (again I'm apparently different) I can't quantify either view, however I do fully agree that white people are sometimes the victims of being branded as racists for clearly misperceived reasons.

     I feel that on both sides of the fence there are ‘bad apples' that bring each side's views of each other, their policies, beliefs, etc into disrepute with the others. At the end of the day there are extremists everywhere no matter what race, religion, etc but it is up to everyone to suppress these idiots.

     I have strong views myself on topics bought up by the BNP such as immigration being ‘out of control' and again fully agree that something needs to be done about this and to preserve the UKs heritage, economy and other things. I do also agree that to live in Britain, you should respect and abide by British values and I will even admit it is annoying that apparent ‘residents' of the UK can't speak English, however I cannot tolerate the point that the BNP is for white Britons only. Where do I fit in all of this? (For in the BNP's eyes I don't) Am I classed as an immigrant? I am neither accepted by the Blacks or the Whites on either side of the waters?

     On a lighter note, I'm going to go and vote and then start preparing to dredge the Atlantic to form a new republic where no one cares who was where first, what religion compatriots believe in nor the colour of their skin, just a place where everyone can be taken for who they are.

     David.

     —- Basically, David, we have no room left for any more incomers. What's happening is not natural immigration, but the Euro-Marxist inspired sysematic, planned, controlled mass uncontrolled immigration designed to effect ethnic displacement, and reduce Britain to a subservient region of the European ‘Union'. We are not ‘racists', but we can and we will defend our society from the demographic war being waged against us. This struggle is as much in your interests as it is in mine/ours. You have NOTHING to fear from the British National Party. - Ed.

     Posted by britman | May 1, 2008, 12:34 pm

110. Ed, I think you bought up an interesting point in your last post. “What's happening is not natural immigration”. I'd disagree. I think what we are seeing is a natural progression of globalisation, and probably the biggest problem of that system. If you consider how many billions of people are living in conditions dramatically worse than those in this country, surely it's natural many will want to come here?

     With our borders uncontrolled to the citizens of impoverished eastern european countries, I agree that the system is impractical. I wouldn't say it's systematic, the real cause is a desire for peace in europe. Thats the real reason the EC started, mainly backed by Churchill. But there seems to be little risk of war in europe now, so I would say the system needs to be modernised. I agree with you on that front.

     You also state we have no more room left for incomers. Surely thats ignoring the fact that our birthrates are significantly lower than 2, meaning that without immigration our population will fall. Basic economics show that with a large amount of elders are low amount of young people, severely reduced immigration will lead to huge tax rises.

     I also think there is one significant difference between the BNP and the other groups listed above. The BNP's aim, correct me if i'm wrong, is to form a government. That is not true of any of the above groups. I'd say a political party should aim to represent all of it's law abiding citizans. Can you really claim to do that when only allowing one race of people to enter your party?

     Do you feel only nationalists love their country? I consider myself a right-liberal, but I do love my country a great deal. I think one custom we have is a tolerance of others, a peaceful nature and a welcoming nature. I feel the BNP is ignoring these traditions of this country.

     I await a rebutal. I'd like to say thanks for allowing people who don't agree with your views to post on your website. The fact that you are the only political party to allow an open forum speaks for the democratic nature of your party. I would like to know why the other parties don't consider it worthwhile.

     Posted by sam | May 2, 2008, 8:59 pm

111. Sam, for years - peak perhaps in 1956 - there's been pressure in the UK to reduce population, not get overpopulated, etc, with dreadful warnings. The ideal population of the UK is something that's been considered by many people, but involves the actions of other countries and is therefore naturally not very fixable. The UK did perfectly well with a lower population and with modern productivity it's not obvious at all that a stable population pyramid with a higher average than before is unrealistic. What is true is that with modern medicine the population of Africa is exploding at a rate unprecedented in human history. There is no way the surplus could be accommodated here. Moreover there are economic pressures on whites which reduce the birthrates; incomers get housed preferentially and also get benefits, which is why some in the BNP refer to deliberate genocide of whites by Labour. Incidentally the EC started as a coal and steel union; there was no attempt that I know of to unite Europe militarily to prevent war. For one thing Germany had taken enormous punishment and millions of its citizens in the east died as a result of allied action after the war. And all these issues are bedevilled by censorship - the BBC and commercial media rarely discuss serious issues. One of the reasons I joined the BNP is because they have the guts to air issues which (for example) BBC hacks and cowards won't face.

     Posted by RW | May 3, 2008, 10:59 am

112. Hi. My name is David and I am currently living in Hull.

     Just today I was talking to a friend of mine (who is a staunch Labour supporter) and we were discussing the recent results. It was then I remembered that I had heard of the BNP's success on the news and decided to take a look at your manifesto. The only problem is that when I mentioned to my friend that I actually quite liked the manifesto, he acted as if I had just commiTted a horrible crime and claimed that th BNP are nothing more than racist Nazis. I find this quite irritating because I agree fully with the points that have been brought up. Why are we whites not allowed to express our views when other races do it al the time? But of course, it is all down the political correctness incurred by our brilliant Labour government who seem more concerned about the feelings of immigrants than actually doing a good job of running the country. I find it so annoying how quickly people are to jump to conclusions, as I have mentioned in the past that I agree with the BNP's views, only to be branded a Nazi. Sadly, even my friends have done that.

     I do quite strongly support the BNP (regardless of what other people tell me to think) and I will most likely be voting for them in the future. The BNP seems like the only party that wants to get anything done. Less of the political correctness and more of sorting this country out and restoring it to its former glory is what I say.

     However, one thing I feel I should address is my own position. The BNP seems to be quite hard on immigrants and foreign nationals. This is fine for illegal immigrants, but what about legitimate immigrants? Also, where do you draw the line at an immigrant? Although I consider myself 100% British (born in Wales, living in England), one half of my family is of Austrian/Ukrainian decent (courtesy of the great WWII). Would I be affected at all?

     I wish BNP all the best in the future, and congratulations with the recent success.

     Many thanks.

     - Hi David, If you are a legal, law-abiding immigrant, or you come from immigrant stock, then you have nothing to fear from the BNP -Ed

     Posted by David29 | May 3, 2008, 8:23 pm

113. I still can not believe that people can be so ignorant of this. My peers are approximately 18 years of age, and have only just been given the opportunity to vote. However, they seem not to see the injustice in these groups, and a recent comment on Facebook stated the disgust at the amount of votes that the BNP had gained. Of course, most of my peers are still under the impression that the BNP are racist and violent. The truth is, is that they have been so blinded by political correctness that they cannot see the injustice being done by immigrants. The groups outlined in this article are warmly accepted by almost everyone I know, yet the BNP are not, even when they stand for justice.

     Posted by VeronicaH | May 3, 2008, 11:29 pm

114. Veronica, I couldn't agree more. This is the exact same response from people I know. It seems that even mentioning the BNP has become taboo, yet with no just reason.

     Posted by David29 | May 4, 2008, 12:28 am

115. “I consider myself a right-liberal, but I do love my country a great deal. I think one custom we have is a tolerance of others, a peaceful nature and a welcoming nature. I feel the BNP is ignoring these traditions of this country”.

     It seems to me that there is a great of complacency and some pride in what you say here, sam. Presumably you are a democrat and you would agree with the proposition that the British people should have been thoroughly consulted on this radical change to the make up of their country, and their opinions heeded. Of course there was no such process and so mass immigration has always fundamentally lacked legitimacy. To subject the British people to a population replacement policy is a most monstrous outrage. Tolerance is no doubt a virtue but it is fairly said that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Here's a couple of examples of where the liberal “elite” is taking us:

     Trevor Phillips says :”However, we have seen the emergence of a kind of cold war in some parts of the country, where very separate communities exist side by side… with poor communication across racial or religious lines.” Daily Telegraph

     “Quote: Election fraud driven by immigrants practising 'village politics' of the Indian sub-continent could be a crucial factor in deciding the future control of Birmingham City Council, a major report warns today.”

     http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/04/30/birmingham-electoral-fraud-could-determine-shape-of-city-council/

     These were a couple of recent examples I selected to illustrate the point, I could have picked many more from this excellent BNP site. Doesn't look too clever, does it sam?

     “Basic economics show that with a large amount of elders are low amount of young people, severely reduced immigration will lead to huge tax rises.”

     You are clearly a believer in liberal economics but the BNP is far from alone in seeing this as a deeply flawed philosophy. The economics editor of the Guardian, Larry Elliot, wrote a book called Fantasy Island exposing the myths of liberal economics. He wrote that a “buoyant labour market has been hallucinated into existence”, essentially by the manufacture of an enormous debt time bomb. He maintains that a country that acts in such a delusional way is: “storing up terrible trouble for itself” when the “economic house of cards” collapses. The chief economist of Goldman Sachs has very recently said that the UK, with its heavy reliance on financial services, was ‘in the eye of the storm of a deleveraging world economy'. Contrary to government propaganda we do not have full employment, a study by Sheffield Hallam University put the real total at 2.7 millions. Unemployment is a lagging indicator and as the credit crunch really bites it will increase sharply on an already high base. So your notion that we require new hordes of immigrant workers is absolutely wrong, sam. A thread entitled :”Is the BNP racist” is perhaps not the most appropriate place to discuss the bleak economic situation, though liberalism generally is predicated upon liberal economics, and we are looking at a busted philosophy. However, sam, I would recommend that you have a look at this thread where some of the arguments have been further developed.

     http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/03/26/we-should-have-bought-back-jaguar-and-land-rover/

     Posted by neversurrender | May 4, 2008, 7:24 am

116. Many of these organisations are VERY political! BUT.. does it not strike you as 'odd' that there is no 'National White Police Association', no 'White Londoners Forum', no 'Federation of White Housing Associations? Maybe you can answer us-Why IS that the case?-Ed

     Perhaps because they are reperesenting a minority, as in democracy everybodies voices should be heard, and there needs to be a fair represenation of all cultures and backgrounds in democracy. That is like asking why in high school there is eperate toilets for the first years! Or why students are the only ones allowed in a Student Union. This ignorance is beyond me…

     -

     “Why IS that the case? - Ed”

     Its called fascism, Laura, by whatever stripe. Its what the liblabcon and its media/searchlight cohorts accuse us of. - Ed

     http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2008/05/truth-about-left.html

     http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f99_1185836519

     Posted by laura11 | May 4, 2008, 12:03 pm

117. Fascism is what the BNP are. Pardon me, but if there is something you beleieve in so strongly at least admit to it. Thw way Labour, Liberal and Conservatives do.

     If the BNP do come to power, god forbid, will you remove the people who dont fall into your ‘British' race form the electorate? Will you demolish all of those websites that allow freedom of expression and representation for those who need it? Is it me or will this be history repeating itself?

     I think you will find that the BNP are simply in denial, and it must be quite depressing knowing the only reason you get votes form the electorate is due to rebellion towards the government, most of your voters have no idea what is in your manifesto, or even what one is… -

     So the voters are dim and you know better eh? Now where have we heard that before, ‘comrade'? Was it Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, Mugabe? - Hmmmmm ?

     Manifesto - http://www.bnp.org.uk/pdf_files/minimanifesto2007.pdf

     Truth about the left - http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2008/05/truth-about-left.html

     Antifascists - http://www.cesc.net/radicalweb/radicalconsultation/rankin/ar2.html

     There you are. Now everyone knows.

     Still think you know better, comrade? - Ed

     Posted by laura11 | May 4, 2008, 2:48 pm

118. lloyd: ‘but then why does the BNP regularly publish on its website reports of non-whites committing crimes, murders etc?'

     - Because no-one else does!

     We have rights too, so get used to it! And read the bl**dy articles properly before you start calling everyone a ‘racist' and all that crap! Facts are facts, they are being selectively reported by the toadying ‘mainstream media'.

     The BNP never said ‘Whites are superior' - people like you did! No doubt you would object if someone started an organisation called ‘Operation White Vote', but of course ‘Operation Black Vote' has to be funded by YOUR taxes! - assuming you pay any!

     We don't have to take this and we're not.

     Posted by apendragon | May 4, 2008, 3:26 pm

119. Fascist: Formerly a follower of the doctrine of Fascism, a vicious political philosophy of a militarist Totalitarianism. Nowadays, the word Fascist refers to anyone who annoys you, even slightly. Why exactly the Fascists stopped strutting around in black shirts publicly assaulting their enemies and started correcting the spelling of your e-mails instead and telling you off for not washing your coffee cup is unknown. - Uncyclopaedia.

     Posted by apendragon | May 4, 2008, 3:27 pm

120. I am disappointed that my previous comment was deleted. Perhaps it's because I included Nick Griffin's views on non-whites? Or perhaps because I pointed out how much of the so-called “manifesto” was actually just unfocused complaints with no indication of how your “policies” might be achieved? Or maybe because I pointed out that the claim that no black soldiers fought in WW1 was false?

     Sadly, the BNP has not changed. A group of racist, ignorant thugs relying on bandwagon jumping and public dissatisfaction to spread their filth.

     — Actually, weirdbeard, your first post was just too long, about a page too long. We are dealing with large numbers of incoming comments and we don't have all day to give you the answers that are already there if you bothered looking. BTW, I am far from an ‘ignorant thug', and I've yet to meet a single BNP member who is one. I/we have no interest in 'spreading filth'. We are realists, not ‘racists' or USEFUL IDIOTS. Your comments elsewhere, regarding standards of grammar etc., only serve to illustrate part of the problem of decline we seek to address. Wise up, or consign future generations to barbarism. - Ed.

     Posted by weirdbeard | May 4, 2008, 8:25 pm

121. Or maybe it's because I used the apostrophe correctly. I find it ironic that you claim “middle class white kids” are suffering at school due to racist policies. Clearly those policies existed when most of your writers were at school, given the general quality of grammar and punctuation in most of the articles.

     Posted by weirdbeard | May 4, 2008, 8:26 pm

122. david (I think), like many people, including TV/ news commentators, you haven't noticed one highly important aspect of ‘liberal economics', which is that the social costs of labour are offloaded onto other people, under the generally accepted vague doctrines. It's all very well getting cheap labour, but the employers offload the housing, medical, travel, legal, translation and other costs, notably crime, onto the public. Immigration started when some judgment was made that immigrants had the ‘right' to be housed by local authorities, despite the fact the legislation was never intended for the purpose. Same with ‘free' NHS, ‘free' legal advice, ‘free' policing, ‘free' education for kids. The recent House of Lords report finally made some attempt to include these things and their conclusions were that the whole project had been hugely expensive. This of course doesn't include the social side of things - British kids and young adults now being unable to buy housing, for example.

     Posted by RW | May 5, 2008, 12:08 am

123. weirdbeard, perhaps you don't know that the main parties supported genocide in Vietnam, Cambodia, Biafra, East Timor and many other places, under the American umbrella, and all of them on a racist basis. The death toll was, or is, enormous. You seem to have little idea about the censorship which applies generally int he west. The BNP opposes wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and has views, which may or may not be correct, on oil in relation to these countries. No other party will even debate the issues. You seem, in short, to be a fool and I hope you don't put into practice the thuggery you seem to consider justified in support of your routinised stupidity.

     Posted by RW | May 5, 2008, 12:13 am

124. “I find it ironic that you claim 'middle class white kids' are suffering at school due to racist policies. Clearly those policies existed when most of your writers were at school, given the general quality of grammar and punctuation in most of the articles.”

     Well what a snide, petulant, petty and misinformed comment we have here then.

     “It is historical fact that most of the jobs lost in communities destroyed by Britain's de-industralisation have involved male workers. It is easy to forget that we once had docks in London and Liverpool, shipyards in Belfast and Newcastle, coal mines in Nottingham and Kent, steelworkers in Sheffield and South Wales….. Investment capital may have moved on to hedge funds, but the people remain.'(thisislondon)

     'He said it was 'little wonder' that a major Government report on teaching Britishness in schools found many white boys had negative views about their national identity(24dash.com)'.

     http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/03/19/government-ministers-certainly-know-their-priorities/

     “The financial dimension is key. The superclass can only make the scale of money it does because of its capacity to do what it will with cash - borrow it, leverage it, move it across borders, take over companies with it and shelter it from taxation.” Will Hutton, Observer.

     “In the supposedly enlightened and politically correct approach of the National Curriculum, there is plenty of space for cultural relativism but very little for factual knowledge; lots of empathy, but little objectivity. ”

     http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/main.jhtml?xml=/education/2002/06/01/tenhist01.xml&page=1

     It is not even possible to collect the national songs of this country, so that children might learn them, without this modest project foundering amidst accusations of “cultural imperialism”. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1925329/National-Song-book-project-falls-flat.html

     There needs to be a healing and settling of the nation. As the Labour MP Frank Field, one of the very few of that tribe of the slightest merit, put it: “a labour transit camp is not most people's idea of a country”. Only the BNP has the vision and the will to begin setting matters to rights. The issue at hand is whether the nation will continue to exist at all in any meaningful, secure sense in the future.

     Posted by neversurrender | May 5, 2008, 7:32 am

125. I feel I should point out there are some slight differences between the organisations that you list and the BNP, the main one being, I am certain none of these groups advocate the removal of the native population or any other group of citizens from our society (repatriation). Quite a fundamental difference.

     — Debateable. - Ed.

     Posted by Georgeboy | May 9, 2008, 7:07 pm

126. Not sure which part of my previous post was debatable, was it that there may not be differences between the “other” organisations and the BNP, or whether or not these organisations advocate the removal of selected groups from our society, anyway never mind. Thanks for displaying my post. Do you think you could display my post regarding the Union Flag and Burka ban story, prove that you you really are in favour of freedom of speech. I don't think it breaches any of your forum rules.

     — I honestly do not know which post you are referring to, please re-submit and we'll take a look at it. BTW this is not a forum. - Ed. This particular mod is now logging off as there is an electrical storm, back later. - Ed.

     Posted by Georgeboy | May 9, 2008, 8:12 pm

127. “I feel I should point out there are some slight differences between the organisations that you list and the BNP, the main one being, I am certain none of these groups advocate the removal of the native population or any other group of citizens from our society (repatriation). Quite a fundamental difference.”

     The term “Our society” begs the question, for whose society is it precisely? As amply demonstrated upon this thread mass immigration, undertaken without any consultation and consent, was a profoundly illegitimate act committed by Tory and Labour governments. They have devalued British citizenship to the level of a giveaway plastic toy. The BNP is therefore quite right to seek to put this process into reverse by proposing a policy of voluntary repatriation, the policy that Enoch Powell advocated all those years ago. It is not only right, it is essential to do this. The immigrant from Guyana Trevor Phillips told us recently that a state of what he described as “cold war” exists between various imported communities in our land. It is a truism that a house divided against itself cannot stand and therefore, if this country is not to descend into some nightmare dystopia, action along the lines proposed by the BNP must take place.

     We see signs now that our opponents wish to act forcibly against us. Commissar Phillips is pleased to describe nationalists as “less than human”. Inherent in calling people sub-human is a willingness to dispose of them, by exile or otherwise. The highly influential liberal economist Willem Buiter writes that:

     “Expulsion/exiling of residents/citizens of a country is something that should not be considered lightly. It is a sanction of last resort for repeated transgressions against the rules……. Some other way of protecting the country/club from those who do not accept and constitute a material threat to its fundamental values and binding rules will have to be found (internal exile to a small uninhabited island in the Outer Hebrides comes to mind).”

     http://blogs.ft.com/maverecon/2008/04/imagine-theres-no-country/#more-178

     There is no doubt that Buiter is talking about us here; “liberalism must develop sharp teeth”, he says. Nationalists are not calling anybody sub-human, nor advocating their forced removal, or internal Gulag style exile. It is important to realise that we are not the aggressors here, we do not go around picking fights. But there is a sticking point for it is absolutely unacceptable that we become a minority in our own country. We merely seek to defend ourselves and our country from the consequences of a disasterous and illegitimate stealth invasion.

     Posted by Stringbag | May 10, 2008, 6:34 am

128. The BNP policy is something that I agree with. British people first in Britain. You get any fairer than that?

     Ah - those were the days - Ed

     Posted by comb force | May 14, 2008, 5:57 pm

129. Yes, of course the BNP is racist. These other so called “racist” organisations mentions are simply to protect a group who comes under threats. You, however, promote racist views and in many people's opinions, this should not be allowed. Perhaps one or two of your points make sense, and as a white person you might expect me to agree that British people come first in Britain. However, I am not racsit and I feel you do not deserve to be allowed to continue your vicious hate campaign.

     — What ‘vicious hate campaign'? Perhaps you mean Trevor Phillips saying that BNP supporters should be treated as ‘less than human'? Or maybe you prefer Jack Straw's assertion that ‘the English are a race not worth saving', or that there are ‘too many Whites' in the judiciary? How about Islamofascists touring our streets and calling for insurrection against us, and calling us ‘Kafir' and getting away with it? Are you happy about anti-White discrimination in employment? Do you care about the wholesale destruction of our countryside, endless EU ‘directives' telling us what we may or may not do or say? Have you been given a say in the RATification of the EU Constitution-cum-Treaty? Do you want electoral fraud to become a normal part of the political process? Do you approve of the building of endless mosques, the undermining of our laws, values and customs, and the appalling levels of brutal crimes and communal tensions, vandalism, gang warfare, people-trafficking, knifings, shootings, the Marxist indoctrination of our schoolchildren, the erasure of history, mass illiteracy, endless wars, press censorship, state monitoring of citizens, the emasculation of youth, in short the systematic destruction of Britain as a Christian-based, democratic society?

     Or should we not be allowed to voice our opinion? Is that the idea?

     ‘These other so called “racist” organisations mentions are simply to protect a group who comes under threats.' What on Earth does that mean? People like myself gave up being ‘useful idiots' when we woke up and smelt the Jihad. We know an invasion when we see one. Enjoy your weekend. Make sure you get permission from your local imam and obtain the necessary paperwork from Brussels first. - Ed.

     Posted by TankIncident | May 17, 2008, 9:07 pm

130. The BNP as a party is not racist. It may have members and supporters who, by our enemies definition, hold racist, or prejudiced views but to no greater extent than any of the other parties. Is hating someone because of their class any different from hating someone because of their race? After all, what we are talking about here is basic human nature, which cannot be kicked out, stamped out, abolished or banned no matter how hard they may try. Everybody from whatever place has the right to seek a better life for themselves and their loved ones, but what many fail to see is how this is being exploited by our political masters for their own ends. To slightly misquote Bob Dylan from many years ago, they are only a pawn in their game.

     Posted by AndrewB | May 18, 2008, 8:21 am

131. “Fascists!”, I hear, time after time, from critics of the BNP. Tommy-rot! I would like to address Laura11 here, as I believe that she, and others, have absolutely no idea as to the nature of fascism.

     I hope then, that she, and others, will see that the current Labour government, and the tripartite of New Labour, Conservative (Blue Labour) and Lib-Dem politicians, are the true fascists here.

     Fascism's beginning lay in “mercantilism”. In part, it meant government control of the economy and colonies controlled by force of arms. One example of a mercantilist enterprise was the British East India Company, which ruled that country for the Queen. Another was the Dutch East India Company, which, at the height of its power, had forty warships. Benito Mussolini renamed this system and installed it in Italy after World War I. He called it 'Fascism.' Remember that Fascism had nothing to do with oppressing Jews. According to Mussolini, Fascism is an amalgamation of the monster corporations and the government, which gives the former the force they need to impose their will and gives the latter the power they crave. Indeed, Mussolini's system also became known as 'the corporate state.' In Britain, governments have systematically hived off British assets to Big Business. The interests of Big Banking, Big Oil, Big Pharmaceuticals, Big Food etc. take precedence over us, the British people. We are now in the field of International Corporate Fascism, or, as most people know it, Globalism. I ask that you now read the superb Lee John Barnes piece on Globalisation, Fascism, and Eco-Nationalism for further clarification:

     http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2008/05/harvard-university-and-globalisation.html

     Posted by Shropshire Lass | May 18, 2008, 11:42 am

132. Watch and learn - http://www.bnptv.org.uk/video/Aurther_Kemp_FSID-Web_Ver2.wmv

     So, are we ‘waysist'?

     Posted by Dylan | May 19, 2008, 3:06 pm

133. Unfortunately, nationalistic or patriotic feelings of the indigenous British population have become dirty words. I had to do a course at Derby Uni. and I felt that multiculturalism is being fed to the young generations as the new religion, and many are blindly led to believe in it wholeheartedly (more brainwashed I'd say).

     To Ed-Do you think you could crumble this huge mountain of struggle to reserve the true ownership of Britain?

     -

     We will certainly try, Rose. Welcome aboard. - Ed

     Posted by Rose | May 20, 2008, 8:21 pm

134. Look what I found! Thanks Wikipedia:–

     England ranks amongst the world's most influential and far-reaching centres of cultural development.[6] It is the place of origin of the English language and the Church of England, and English law forms the basis of the legal systems of many countries; in addition, London was the centre of the British Empire, and the country was the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution.[7] England was the first country in the world to become industrialised.[8] England is home to the Royal Society, which laid the foundations of modern experimental science. England was the world's first modern parliamentary democracy[9] and consequently many constitutional, governmental and legal innovations that had their origin in England have been widely adopted by other nations.

     Posted by RW | May 21, 2008, 1:46 pm

135. Quite sad, RW, that we seize upon a positive view of our nation so readily(wikiquote), 50 years this would have been accepted without question, apart of course from a small minority of Marxist agitators who had burrowed their way into the body politic.

     There is has been an evil plot, a concerted attempt by the liberal left to constantly denigrate the achievements of this country, to paint us as wicked slavers and imperialists particularly. The purpose of this has been to ripen us for colonisation and population replacement. The existing population isn't much to their taste, especially the indigenous working class, so they have determined to change it. The paradise of diversity left lies and lies again. Take this ridiculous nonsense about the Spanish Armada shown below. Phillips seizes on it, but the absurd tale he picked up, spun out of the merest fragment, was supplied to him by a fellow traveller at Hay Festival:

     “When we talk about the Armada it's only now that we are beginning to realise that part of it is Muslims,” Mr Phillips told a Labour fringe meeting. “It was the Turks who saved us, because they held up Armada at the request of Elizabeth I. Now let's rewrite that story, let's use our heritage to rewrite that story so it is truly inclusive. “That's the reason for this so we have an identity which brings us together, which binds us in the stormy times that we are going to have in the next century.”

     “But Mr Brotton told the festival: “Walsingham's plan was ultimately successful. Ottoman fleet movements in the eastern Mediterranean fatally split Philip II's armada - So alongside all the stories we're told at school about why the Spanish Armada failed to conquer Britain and destroy Protestantism, we should add another reason: the Anglo-Ottoman alliance brokered by Elizabeth, Walsingham [and others].”

     http://ukcommentators.blogspot.com/2007/09/new-liberal-myth-gets-half-way-round.html

     True British patriots would certainly agree with Phillips that the course ahead is “stormy”, what else could it be given the illegitimate stealth invasion of our country? But our answers are much different to those of Phillips, and they don't include the sleazily disingenuous invention of history in the pursuit of a mad, disasterous ideologically driven project.

     -

     http://en.metapedia.org/ - Ed

     Posted by Stringbag | May 22, 2008, 9:45 am

136. “You are clearly a believer in liberal economics but the BNP is far from alone in seeing this as a deeply flawed philosophy.”

     Of course, but after liberal economics saved our country under Mrs Thatcher it now has many supporters. A different economic policy and we really could be a very poor country considering the mess Labour left us in in ‘79.

     Anyone suggesting the BNP shouldn't be allowed to stand in elections is wrong. Democracy is about allowing everyone their say, no matter how abhorrent their views are to you.

     Posted by sam | May 23, 2008, 6:58 pm

137. “Of course, but after liberal economics saved our country under Mrs Thatcher it now has many supporters.”

     The Blessed Margaret, Patron Saint of Asset Strippers, was the undertaker of British industry. The spurious economic miracle she proclaimed was a smoke and mirrors job funded from selling the family silver and blowing North Sea Oil.

     “A different economic policy and we really could be a very poor country considering the mess Labour left us in in €˜79″.

     Nulab are Thatcher's heirs. Contrary to what some believe we are well on course to become a poor country. Nulab's “economic miracle” was based on City “financial innovation” and public sector squandermania. This has now well and truly hit the buffers. This thread is not really the place for such discussion but very briefly our net external debt has increased by a factor of 9 in 11 years, personal debt exceeds GDP, the Government has completely maxed out and boasts the worst budget deficit in the G7. The economy is completely hollowed out, there's nothing in the kitty, and in consequence the liberal state, however imposing it might appear, is just a facade.

     Posted by Stringbag | May 24, 2008, 6:18 pm

138. It was reported on BBC Newsbriefing this morning that the “noble” Lord Rooker, Minister for Sustainable Food and Farming and Animal Health(as if), is going to visit the London Wetland Centre today:

     http://www.wwt.org.uk/centre/119/London.html

     The purpose of His Lordship's visitation is apparently to discuss ways of protecting native species of plants and animals from “invasive” foreign species which present a grave threat to their survival. I must say I am rather suprised that globalised Nulab consider that there are such native species, or indeed ever were - surely all these species were immigrants constantly “enriched” by yet more immigration according to their liberal left lexicon of lunacy! The unelected and unrepresentative Labour politico's visit is no doubt worthy up to a point. But the big picture is being missed - where are the people? What about the indigenous people of these Islands?

     “The genetic evidence shows that three quarters of our ancestors came to this corner of Europe as hunter-gatherers, between 15,000 and 7,500 years ago, after the melting of the ice caps but before the land broke away from the mainland and divided into islands. Our subsequent separation from Europe has preserved a genetic time capsule of southwestern Europe during the ice age……” http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=7817

     We are being subjected to wholesale population replacement which is in fact tantamount to genocide, and at the behest of “our” government. When will we have a government which cares about real diversity?

     Posted by Stringbag | May 28, 2008, 5:56 am

139. is the bnp racist…. i think it is clearly seen that the bnp is a modern facist,racist party. members and supporters seem to have wisened up from the skin head days. back in the 70s many racist attacks were taking place. the bnp is very VERY good at manilpulating quotes and situations in the media, the party like to make out as if they are on the recieving side of the negativity being dished out. i am well aware that this comment is soon to be removed as it does not comply with BNP veiws, if the uk was run by the BNP then it would become the richest country in the world to the poorest contry in the world. after all which country would be proud to trade with a faciast government. i hope that people reviewing this comment can take this critisism on board especially as it is coming from a 16 year old boy who is wiser that the BNP leader nick griffen. who i also think is a modern day hitler.

     ………….. Here we have a product of 10 years of ejookayshun under NuLabour. Make from it what you will. - Ed

     Posted by sunny2k1 | May 31, 2008, 1:21 am

140. Well, I'm new to this but I would like to say, even though I may not fully understand all the political strategies of the BNP, that I fully agree with many things you say. I'm not a racist but at the end of the day I prefer “my own”. The whole culture of our British society is going down the swanee to make way for other peoples' cultures. I don't want a multicultural Britain and yes, I thoroughly believe that no more asylum seekers should be allowed in. But what really gets me is the fact that people from the EU who work in this country are entitled to claim child benefits, even though they don't pay tax in Britain, for their kids that don't even live in this country. The government doesn't even know whether the claims are genuine all the time.

     I do agree with what the BNP stands for, and with other comments left by visitors, so keep up the good work!

     -

     Welcome aboard, LisaEliz. You might want to look through our summary manifesto too - http://www.bnp.org.uk/pdf_files/minimanifesto2007.pdf Regards, - Ed

     Posted by LisaEliz | June 2, 2008, 9:39 am

141. In the United States, Oregon state legislature decreed that only white people can be racist. In North America it is highly regarded that the western areas of the continent are stated as the LEFT coast, meaning leftist. It doesn't matter if its Canada's province of British Columbia or in the United States. The western regions do some crazy stuff, and lean particularly leftist in political opinion. But to be branded as racist by a government just because I'm white, and all other nationalities as puritan clean of racist tendencies is moronic. I guess that's to be expected by self apologizing misfits likes Liberals. Their rose coloured glasses only see what they want to see.

     Posted by Less1leg | June 5, 2008, 3:01 pm

142. common view of the world

     “Common” being the operative word. Your post would hold more credence if the legality of the immigration was beyond dispute. But to instigate such massive, catastropic and seemingly irreversible changes to a stable society without a popular referendum is nothing short of criminal. But just keep your head in the sand mate, praying that you and yours won't ever have to suffer the often fatal consequences of “enrichment.”

     Posted by the likes of us | June 5, 2008, 5:02 pm

143. On LiveLeak there was a news article done by the Australian version of the BBC. The reporter went shopping for various articles and services in Chinese shops. The comparitor person of Oriental Mandarin background likewise went to the same shops with an identical item or service to purchase. The Chinese mandarin person got the service and the article far cheaper than the average Joe Australian. So don't tell me that only Whites are racist! Chinese, Jamaican, Greeks–they are all racist in their neighbourhoods when the opportunity arises. We all are to some degree. And I'm not at least going to lie about it like the moronic Liberals who rip you off and smile about it.

     Posted by Less1leg | June 5, 2008, 6:53 pm

144. Hello elijah. I'm glad that you're proud to be black if it makes you feel better. Personally, I rarely think of my skin colour; I was born white, had nothing to do with it and cannot change it. Why should I be proud of something I had nothing to do with? I'm proud to be British for what we once stood, fought and died for - and I can hand my passport in at any time and find another country that will take me if I don't like it.

     Am I glad to be white? I suppose I am. If you are glad to be black, then it's one less thing to worry about as you journey through life - same for me. It must be terrible wishing you were someone else - or another colour God forbid.

     You seem to have a lion's pride, so why not channel that pride into setting up a movement for black Brits to help save Britain? I assume you are proud to be British - aren't you? Nobody wants to kick black Brits out of anywhere. We just need to keep the Party for white, indigenous Brits because there is nobody else looking after our interests. You have a plethora of groups looking after yours - or so they would like you to think.

     If you think we are ‘racist' whatever that means, how many white Lib/Lab/Con merchants do you know who live in black (or white) run-down neighbourhoods? They are just after your vote but you would not want to hear what these privileged swine say about you and yours (or ours) behind closed doors. Save your vitriol for them not us. Have a good life.

     Posted by Winston | June 7, 2008, 5:06 pm

145. “Finally, during the 4th of June, 2006, edition of Dateline London, Gavin Essler posed this question: “What's wrong with white guys, by the way?”

     To which Alibhai-Brown replied:

     “I don't like them. I want them to be the lost species in 100 years”.

     http://www.iamanenglishman.com/page.php?iCategoryId=747&iParentId=689

     So why is this strident harridan still writing for an alleged newspaper of quality? The answer of course is that she is merely reflecting the line of the Independent; a treasonable, shrieking, globalist, self-loathing, multi-culti comic. And judging by the award and retention of an MBE, for “services to journalism”, her extreme racism finds favour within the highest reaches of the British Establishment, which isn't much of a surprise really, given the way that the nation has been so comprehensively betrayed.

     Indigenous people need to wake up. Interlopers like Alibhai-Brown and political and journalistic Quislings bear us nothing but hatred and ill-will.

     Posted by Stringbag | June 10, 2008, 5:19 am

146. Is the BNP racist? No, I say. Why is it that when you finally stand up to the liberals and say no to their constant demands of change, every one of the liberal leaders or new leaders of the leftist liberal political parties all say that change is in the air, new and improved. It never stops with the one-upmanship of liberals pulling this horse-hockey bafflegab over the voters. Either the Liberals are apologizing over something that happened in the past, or they are changing society in their never ending series of social engineering? It just never stops. Just look at the last sixty years of history. The liberalization of laws has turned the current courts into the places of making laws instead of using the laws. Our new and improved government members don't want to make laws, instead they want to side-step their position and force the courts to make the laws so that they will not have to take responsibility for the direction that society will have to follow. Then the leader of the government appoints a court judge who is overwhelmingly liberal to entrench the courts with years of leftist decisions. No, the BNP is not racist. It's only saying or questioning the lost stability that once was British rule of law, and British standards of vibrant society.

     Posted by Less1leg | June 10, 2008, 2:31 pm

147. I've listened to a documentary tonight about “culturally-specific care”; specifically day care and other services for elderly black and Asian people.

     http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/factual/pip/svrq3/

     Since the specific services mentioned are in areas of white minority, the argument of catering for minority groups can't be called upon.

     The justification seems to be one of catering for cultural needs of specific groups.

     There was a proud claim made early in the programme that Asians have been ‘integrating successfully' but this seems to be in contradiction with the programme's premise that there is a need for culturally-specific care - for those with Asian dietary, religious and language needs.

     Is anyone interested in starting groups (and applying for public funding) which cater for the cultural, nutrition and religious needs of white British people in areas of white minority? It seems (from minimal research) that you can openly advertise your services as being for a specific group, as long as you mention somewhere that you're open to all comers.

     -

     Noted, peahen, thanks, and welcome aboard. - Ed

     Posted by peahen | June 16, 2008, 10:26 pm

148. No the BNP is not racist. The majority of trouble that occurs in my area involved the killing of white youths by black youths. I am merely supporting the FACTS of life. The majority of all shops owned are by Asians and i feel like a complete minority in my own area. I feel sorry for the older generation who fought so bravely to prevent a “real racist” Nazi army, only to have the identity they fought so bravely for destroyed. The BNP will always have my vote. Unfortunately I may be living in another country should things ever change. Better to be the minority in somebody else's country, don't you think? I know many who agree with me. Why do you think Labour give immigrants the right to vote after a few years residency. They keep them sweet, then secure their votes. God Bless the once-Great Britain.

     Posted by mace | July 1, 2008, 6:50 pm

149. The BNP are in no way racist, but then the loons in government think that anyone who does not follow their warped way of thinking is racist. And because those of us who support the BNP are against immigration, Islam, the EU, etc., the government and the parasites in the Muslim Council of Britain don't like this. They want to ruin England and make the country Islamic. It is never going to happen. Muslims can go take their stone age claptrap back to their own countries! They are not welcome here, no matter what parasites like Gordon Brown have to say.

     Posted by EnglandxChick | July 3, 2008, 3:10 pm

150. I get fed up with the xenophobic PC Brigade calling the BNP and all of its supporters racist. Instead of attacking the BNP, the so-called establishment should look at the issues raised by the BNP and realise that the indigenous people of this country are very worried about the state of our country under the criminal governments that we have had for the past 40 years. What was a rich and powerful country with its own industrial and economic base with the best health and welfare system in the world has degenerated into a tin pot Euro country that will let any riff-raff in, and let criminals get away with anything, and has a government both local and national that is self-serving and subservient to every ethnic group apart from the ones that actually voted for them. As a middle class, working taxpayer of Anglo-Irish descent I support the BNP in everything they are doing, and I AM NOT A RACIST!!! I woke up 5 years ago from being a full member of the Liberal Democrats and regard myself centre left in politics, but enough is enough.

     Posted by demerzal | July 3, 2008, 6:14 pm

151. It always amazes me that the BNP is described as racist. It is the only party that really cares for aliens. The BNP wants these foreigners to be happy, safe and at home. Of course they would feel safest and happiest and most comfortable where they sprang from, surely? Far be it for me to single out muslims as the government does, but they want everything their way, so twere best they went on their way …

     Posted by gildedtumbrils | July 6, 2008, 5:22 pm

152. No, the BNP is NOT racist!

     The truth will set you free.

     Wake up Britain!

     Posted by groundhog | July 7, 2008, 3:42 pm

153. The BNP are not ‘racist' We are not going around spreading hatred for anyone> All we want to do is live in peace in our own country that was fought for by generations of our young men and women who now lay in cemeteries all round the world, and the survivors are treated like second class citizens Roll on the BNP tide of proper respect and memory of those who fell defending this great country.

     Posted by crispy | July 7, 2008, 4:05 pm

154. The so-called “antifascists” looking for “waysism” are mentally ill -

     http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3394

     They even attack babies!

     Posted by Dylan | July 8, 2008, 8:14 pm

155. The BNP are far from racist. I used to work with a guy who was Sikh, whose father was a member of the BNP and his words were “they are there for the British people and understood why they fight for the return of British culture and way of life”.

     I would also like to say that political correctness has gone absolutely mad. Following a recent article in one of the local papers, when it was said “a police force had to apologise after complaints were made regarding a 29 week old black puppy that was put onto a postcard promoting the force's new non-emergency telephone number, but the choice of image that shows the dog sitting on a policeman's hat was questioned by a councillor who said it would not be welcomed by some communities, for concerns were raised that dogs are considered impure and unclean in Islamic culture, and it was said that some shop-keepers would not display it. So what should we do? Ban all dogs? Cover our women? Not breed pigs? Take down our churches? Keep our mouths shut and do as we are told? I am ashamed to call myself British for Britain no longer exists. Britain is becoming a mongrel country. - But those same shop-keepers have no problem selling dog-food and packs of bacon and sausage, do they? The police listened to one councillor, who holds extremely radical Islamic views -Ed

     Posted by Mannix | July 10, 2008, 9:03 pm

156. I think BNP members are considered racist whilst members of groups centred around the rights of ethnic minorities are not because Caucasian people are thought to already be in a more privileged position than Black, Jewish or Asian people. It's the same reason why men are more likely to be called sexist than women.

     that's the theory behind the self-serving Marxist lib-left formulation: Racism = Prejudice plus Power. But if we had any real power we wouldn't have had mass immigration in the first place! - Ed

     Posted by mod88 | July 11, 2008, 1:17 am

157. As pointed out upthread it cannot be over-emphasised that we got into this tragic mess of street crime dystopia and alien colonisation through pandering to liberal idiocy over immigration; the alleged economic benefits of mass immigration being delusory.

     “We should offend Liberals, also sentimentalists.' http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2007/aug/06/past.politics”

     Liberals of course are much given to breast-beating, weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth. They love nothing better than a good old wallow in a deep warm bath of guilt and self-loathing with which they justify the ruination of our country. This is most strikingly illustrated by the great liberal mythology surrounding Britain's role in the slave trade where “Kunte Kinte” of “Roots” fame was supposedly kidnapped by evil British sailor; torn from a village ludcrously portrayed as a cross between Club Med and 5th century Athens: “One day in 1767, when the young warrior left his village to find wood to make a drum, he was attacked by four men who surrounded him and took him captive. Kunta awakens to find himself blindfolded, gagged, bound and prisoner of the white men.” wiki

     This is a complete travesty for “Kunta” would in reality have been a captive sold into slavery by powerful African rulers: “Vast wealth flowed into the coffers of the African elite, far eclipsing the profits of any European slave trader. For example, in 1750 King Tegbesu of Dahomey was reliably estimated to have earned pounds 250,000 from the trade in that year alone, five times the annual income of England's richest duke. Little wonder therefore that the British decision in 1807 to prohibit the slave trade sent a shock wave down the West African coast.”

     http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19981116/ai_n14191987

     King Gezo of Dahomey was not about to abandon the practice of selling his fellow Africans into slavery for profit: “The slave trade is the ruling principle of my people. It is the source and the glory of their wealth€¦the mother lulls the child to sleep with notes of triumph over an enemy reduced to slavery€¦”

     It was Britain which outlawed and suppressed the trade, nobody else was going to.

     Posted by Stringbag | July 14, 2008, 10:25 am

158. Tony, interesting story but I suggest you re-post it on a more appropriate thread - Ed

     Posted by Tony | July 15, 2008, 1:54 am

159. The National Black Police Officers Association cannot be called racist, as evidenced by this quote from their website :

     “The definition of “Black” does not refer to skin colour.”

     Glad we got that sorted out !

     If the BNP was racist , I would not support them. They aren't - and I do.

     Posted by ConcernedExPat | July 20, 2008, 12:26 am

160. Leicester City Council have something called a ‘Black Workers Group' See proof here… https://secure.leicester.gov.uk/survey.asp?survey=70&job=7544&aset=46893&spec=1&preview=2

     Posted by Londweard | July 24, 2008, 7:26 pm

161. Oh yes, of course the BNP is racist, I mean, just look at the picture on the BNP homepage…knuckle dragging skinhead racists everywhere! *rollseyes*

     Posted by SimonGB | July 26, 2008, 8:36 am

162. ‘Racist' - The most over used, over played word in today's vocabulary. I'm sick of hearing the word. In general, the people who brand this word about are themselves very insecure. You'll find it mostly eminate from the white lib elite who wish to raise their own self worth by promoting others.

     One day the racist label will implode on itself and we'll be awaiting the next ‘ism' from the liberal, Guardian-reading, yogurt knitting brigade.

     Having worked alongside some local authorities up and down this land of ours, I've met the best and the worst of the Lib/Lab Elite and your average Council Tax payer would be spitting blood if they discovered the amount of money wasted on these people and their little ivory towers. Unfortunately these annoying people just get promoted on to another venture when they cause too much trouble in one department. You'll also be surprised at many local authority preferences at housing immigrants and young single mothers over indigenous couples.

     I have investigated one local authority using the FOI and had a head of department suspended for such practices. I couldn't believe how a white couple were treated over non-contibuting immigrants, but this it seems is now becoming general practice.

     So, racism is mainly caused by our own trying to score points and a boost in their self esteem.

     ….. There is no right to housing any longer - allocation is based on need, not length of residency and contributions to the common pot. It's how they get past accusations of racism - ie: positive discrimination by another name. -Ed

     Posted by MagnaCarta | July 26, 2008, 9:00 pm

163. If I was thinking of racism then the things I believe in are way down the list. What we want is simple, we want our bloody country back; that's not racist its just common sense. It's just the fools who don't understand what it means to be British, hardwoking and proud.

     Posted by scouseproud | July 27, 2008, 1:15 am

164. Racism only works one way. When it's used against the indiginous white population, it's not racism, it's free speech, backed up by politically correct left wingers. When it's telling it like it is, against the overwhelming tide of immigrants/asylum seekers, bringing this country to it's knees, that's called racism. So, basically, a racist is the person winning the argument against the disintegration of the British way of life.

     Posted by Merlinbus | August 4, 2008, 6:48 pm

165. We are going to subsume you all under a Dictatorial Regime, trash your history and culture, your educational institutions, We are going to enslave you, deny your ability to produce for yourselves, even feed your selves, we are going to destroy your culture and heritage, even your race by Mass mass immigration, Millions of abortions (6 Million to date) and sterilise your young schoolgirls.

     Our Allies in Your Government, Establishment, Industry and the Mass Media will routinely label you as Lazy, Fat, Drunken, Drugged up Racist, Murdering Paedophiles repeatedly year after year until it becomes an accepted truth even to you. If you Object to this, If you British Dare to organise against this we will step up our Psychological war agaisnt you, labelling you as Racists, Nazis, Thugs and Mass Murderers.

     I'm sure I've heard stuff like this before.

     Give in now Despots and the British might let you off Lightly.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfp09u8g7vI&feature=related

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7iKmqBckIo&feature=related

     Hasn't the Film Zulu been banned yet. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1csr0dxalpI&feature=related

     We're not going to take it anymore. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rAurIZLgNw

     Posted by royalecraig | August 6, 2008, 8:44 pm