Victims Of Masonic Ill-Treatment 5 August 2000

Anyone criticised or maligned in these publications has a guaranteed right of reply. JMF or P2 Lodge UK stands for the hierarchies of the Judaeo/Masonic Faction. The ordinary Mason and Jew are as likely to suffer from the machinations of the JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are. Almost every institution in the UK is corrupt. While the final blame lies with the Member of Parliament and the Prime Minister, Freemasonry is invariably involved along with the courts, the police and local government. Everything we publish is aimed at the detection and prevention of crime especially in the public sector. We act in the public interest.

Lord Justice Judge delivered a ringing endorsement of press freedom - a principle, he said, which was deeply ingrained in English law. Indeed, he suggested lawyers who repeatedly referred to the European convention on human rights - incorporated in English law on October 2 by the human rights act - did not appreciate that the principles were already enshrined in English common law.

Freedom of speech and protection against self-incrimination were principles "bred in the bone of the common law and indeed, in some instances at any rate, the folk understanding of the community as a whole," he said.

The prospect of the police entering the premises of the Guardian and the Observer, reminded him of a passage written by the constitutional authority, Albert Dicey. "As a matter of general principle," observed Dicey, "with us individual rights are the basis not the result of the law of the constitution".

The judge referred to a case in 1765 - Entick v Carrington - when the king's "messengers" broke into a home of a resident of Stepney, east London, on a warrant from a secretary of state. "No man can set his foot upon my ground without my licence," said the then chief justice, Lord Camden. "Papers are the owner's goods and chattels... where private papers are removed and carried away, the secret nature of those goods will be an aggravation of the trespass... Where is the written law that gives any magistrate such a power? I can safely answer, there is none; and therefore it is too much for us without such authority to pronounce a practice legal, which would be subversive of all the comforts of society".

The judge yesterday referred to a peroration made about the same time by Pitt the Elder. "The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the crown," said Pitt. "It may be frail - its roof may shake - the wind may blow through it - the storm may enter - the rain may enter - but the king of England cannot enter - all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement."

The words of Lord Camden and Pitt, continued the judge yesterday, were encapsulated in the phrase that "an Englishman's home is his castle".

Those principles, said the judge, were clearly understood in this country while an absolute monarch, still reigned in France. "If the Bourbon monarch, Louis XV, had heard of such language used by a prominent politician and former first minister [Pitt] the speaker's best hope would have been for the king to have assumed he was joking. But even that would not have prevented some fawning minion from despatching a lettre de cachet to ensure that he was locked up, indefinitely, and without trial.

"It is hardly surprising therefore that Voltaire, having twice been imprisoned in the Bastille, and eventually forced to live in exile, and notwithstanding what we can now appreciate were its great defects then, so greatly admired our constitution".

The judge moved to a more recent case, in 1981, when Mr Justice Watkins told the high court: "I am concerned with the fundamental freedom which this country has prided itself on maintaining, and for which much blood has been spilt over the centuries, namely freedom of speech".

The two principles reflected in the cases he cited were interlinked, said Lord Justice Judge. "Premises are not to be entered by the forces of authority or the state to deter or diminish, inhibit or stifle the exercise of an individual's right to free speech or the press of its freedom to investigate and inform...".

He added: "Inconvenient or embarrassing revelations, whether for the security services or for public authorities should not be suppressed".

Comment: The good judge expresses our views. If judges were intelligent, honest and impartial the law and legal precedent would matter not. If solicitors and counsel persist in cheating and lying and if the police do not act against corrupt solicitors and counsel the best judge in the world cannot dispense justice because the facts are not facts. We do have problems, which are currently intractable because the corruption starts at the top and is supported right down to the man in the street. The man in the street is the ordinary Mason who is blinded by loyalty and indoctrination. Second class villains who are more concerned about privacy and immunity for their children than protecting other children and adults from the lawbreakers run this country.

We have been invited to post VOMIT on a human rights website. The human rightists running the page refuse to attribute anti human rights acts to Freemasonry because they have no proof. Jesus wept! It has taken us 20 years to persuade people that we are all victims of organised crime and that Freemasonry is behind the crime. Will the human rights tortoises explain why the membership of Freemasonry is a closely guarded secret? Do they believe the Masons when they claim that they are whiter than white and give generously to good causes? We have been able to show that Dorset Police, Dorset County Council and Dacorum Borough Council are corrupt and we have been able to link the corruption to Masonic membership. We know that Chiltern District Council has two Masonic factions and that it collaborates with a corrupt Bucks County Council. The only authorities that act corruptly are those which know that they have immunity from prosecution. The immunity comes from Freemasonry or Masonic running dogs.

MICHAEL CROLEY

Mr Croley contacted the senior partner at Turners to complain about Jackson. The senior partner told Mr Croley that Jackson would be contacting the police. To forestall more criminal activity by Jackson Mr Croley published a number of letters to Jackson's business associates and others. In one letter to Turners he stated that Jackson had 1. Lied on oath at Dorchester Crown Court. 2. Lied to a Chief Superintendent of Dorset Police. 3. Lied to the Dorchester Police. 4. Lied to the Health and Safety Executive. 5. Deceived British Telecom.

Read what Lord Justice Judge said about freedom of speech and consider that Jackson was a public servant and a servant of the court. Consider also that Mr Croley was acting in the public interest to protect others from the criminal proclivities/negligence of Jackson. Turners of whom you will hear more (Coulter/Parvar/Dolton) apparently condoned Jackson's wrongdoing. Mr Croley went four times to Dorchester Police station and reported the criminal offences committed by Jackson. Four police officers refused to take his documentary evidence. One of them, Sergeant Malcolm Davenport said to Mr Croley "Go away. You will never beat this man".

By publishing facts and reporting matters to the police Mr Croley was committing no offence. See Judge, LJ above. Even if Mr Croley had been lying his offence was a matter for a jury in libel proceedings. Again the police misused the Protection of Harassment Act 1997. The prosecutor Richley Wood objected to Mr Croley's defence because that would have meant that Jackson was on trial. Can you believe it? The magistrates who were apparently nameless found Mr Croley guilty, fined him £200 with £100 costs and ordered him not to communicate with Jackson or Turners, directly or indirectly, for the rest of his life. We are still pulling out our hair because there must be more to this case. Who were the magistrates at Sherborne Magistrates Court on 14 August 1998? Did Mr Croley's solicitor, Simon Lacey, advise him to ask the magistrates to state a case for the High Court or to appeal to the Crown Court? There was an appeal presided over by District Judge Dermot O'Brien who denied being a Mason. Was that an appeal against the harassment judgement or against something else? Where was the appeal heard? Mr Croley's solicitor, Timothy Shorter of Howe & Shorter of Weymouth (Phone 01305 774031. Fax 01305 760594) promised to call three witnesses but failed to do so and thereby facilitated another stitch-up by the court. Police constable Muir admitted that there was nothing to link Mr Croley with the event. What event? The prosecution introduced also new "evidence". Dorset has Zimbabwean legal standards managed by a Masonic Mafia. Are you listening toffee-nosed Chief Constable Stichbury or don't the common folks deserve a fair trial?

SIR DAVID O'DOWD

Sir David O'Dowd, 50 Queen Anne's Gate, LONDON SW1H 9AT

*** Dear Sir, Your fax 020 7273 3370

You are still hiding behind your Staff Officer Howard Roberts. Following my objections to your repulsive Mr Peter Winship, Mr Roberts referred me to Mr Povey also described as Inspector for Thames Valley Police who attempted a shoot-to-kill operation here on 18 August 1999. I assumed that Winship had been retired especially since he was responsible for Dorset and probably Devon and Cornwall too. I then learned that Mr Roberts had referred another person in Dorset to Winship. I published the fact and raised questions about your competence and impartiality. Now Mr Roberts apologises for having misinformed me about Mr Povey. I do not believe that he made a mistake.

I want nothing to do with either Winship or Povey. All these diversions stink of Freemasonry. It is high time you had the courage and integrity to deal with very serious allegations against Chief Constable Pollard who is being protected by his police authority, the Police Complaints Authority and the Home Office, which includes you. Either do your job or get out. Inspectors are supposed to highlight good and bad points and report to their superiors for action as necessary. Have you reported what Thames Valley Police have been doing?

Yours faithfully, JAMES M TODD. Copied to the Prime Minister and VOMIT. ***

On 29 July John and Blanda Masefield of Askerswell, Dorchester (Fax 01308 485729) wrote to O'Dowd as follows.

*** Absolute Power - "Building a safe, just and tolerant society"

We refer to Mr Robert's reply dated 18^th inst. To ours of 14^th inst. Apologies for having unintentionally demoted you - duly corrected.

Mr Winship's reply dated 20^th inst. Explains that he cannot intervene in Dorset Police's "operational issues".

We therefore, enclose copy reply dated 29^th inst., to Mr Parfree which is self-explanatory, you already hold our fax of 7 June to Sir Alistair Graham, PCA but here is another for clarity.

Again, we request you to investigate Dorset Police and PCA on the relevant issues which must be within YOUR remit, else, may the matter be referred to the Home Secretary Jack Straw and Prime Minister, who are already aware by virtue of copy correspondence dated 5^th October 1999.

Yours faithfully, J & B Masefield ***

Comment; Mr Parfree, referred to above, describes himself as "Chief Inspector - Staff Officer" in Winship's office in Woking. Parasites have parasites upon their backs. The Masefields over three days also wrote to Parfree, to Muir (Fax 01305 251481), Head of Legal Services at West Dorset District Council which is corrupt, to their wholly ineffective MP, Dr O Letwin, to the uptight Prime Minister and to Dolce Vita Prescott.

One day someone is going to kill rather than write letters.

GERALD COULTER AND THE INSURANCE SWINDLE

Mr Coulter had a Jeep valued at about £50,000 stolen. The thief was convicted. This should have resulted in the Jeep being impounded by the police and returned to Mr Coulter. The crook who reset the stolen Jeep was named Burke, a brother of a bent Dorset Masonic policeman who was eventually discharged from the police after shoplifting in Boots and assaulting a security officer. Burke, the Mason, was sure that he could get away with depriving Mr Coulter of his property. So far he has succeeded at the expense of the life of solicitor David Dolton who allegedly committed suicide and the end of the police career of Chief Constable Aldous and his Deputy "I was taught to be cautious" May.

Incidentally we are indebted to Major (Retired) Antony Jack of Edinburgh (Ph/Fax 0131 339 5862). The major informs us the Lords issued a judgement on 1 August to the effect that policemen who commit offences are not immune from prosecution or claims for damages. The Lords overturned a judgement by Lord Justice Millett (Now a Law Lord and a leading Mason and Lloyds fiddler). Millett sat with LJs Auld and Schiemann. We like them not.

Mr Coulter's broker was Star Insurance of Potters Bar (Fax 01707 642523) who had handled his claims-free insurance for many years including comprehensive insurance for a Lotus Esprit Turbo and a SAAB Turbo. The insurers were Wellington Motor Policies at Lloyds. We now know that Lloyds Syndicates are above the law and that many judges are names in the syndicates. Ask Royston Leicester, a victim of Lord Millett.

Mr Coulter reported the theft to both brokers and insurers. The police then said that the claim of ownership was a civil matter to be contested in court. The thief had already pleaded guilty. The Jeep should have been impounded immediately by the police by order of the court and returned to Mr Coulter. Star Insurance had covered Mr Coulter separately for legal services against uninsured losses. Substantial premiums had been paid one month before the theft of the Jeep. Burke the bent car dealer left the Jeep in a shed owned by his partner Mohammed Parvar whence it was "stolen" but more likely given a new identity by Masons at DVLC for example. The members of the Police Authority knew that Burke had managed to have the Jeep "stolen" but the police did not tell Mr Coulter with the result that he was put to great expense pursuing legal action for recovery in the High Court. An honest councillor told Mr Coulter about this and also how Deputy Chief Constable May had used Masonic signals when being interviewed for the job.

Star Brokers and Wellington Insurance washed their hands of the claim saying that it was down to Burke and Parvar to claim on their insurance. The uninsured loss legal service was withheld on the grounds that it applied only to personal injury. Mr Coulter was denied a copy of the master policy for uninsured loss. The newly paid premiums were not refunded even in part. That is Freemasonry for you.

WE REGRET THAT WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ON MESSEIURS SCRIVEN, EBERT, KELLETT, OWEN AND HUNT. Norman Scarth's police inflicted injuries are being treated in a Bradford hospital. The Lord Chancellor has published a list of "vexatious litigants" on the Internet and has prejudiced legal action by Peter Prankerd against the man who killed his son Simon in Florida and who is serving a prison sentence of around 100 years.

Published by J M Todd-Misbourne Farmhouse-Amersham Road-Chalfont St Giles-Bucks. HP8 4RU

Per pro Vomit. No copyright. Tel 01494 871204. Fax 01494 870031