Victims Of Masonic Ill-Treatment 19 February 2000

of the JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are.

1. CK0635 Albert Dryden, H M Prison Garth, LEYLAND, LANCS. wrote to us on 13 February 2000 enclosing a newspaper item. The item shows that Rose Coddling used her boots and a knife to carry out her threat to kill her cohabitant, Mr Les Amos. She was sentenced to 7 years in prison and will serve less than 5 years. Albert Dryden has spent nearly 9 years in prison with no hope of release even although he was harassed for years and then very seriously provoked into firing a gun, which killed a Chief Planning Officer who had effectively entrapped him. The Chief Planning Officer was the golfing partner of Durham’s Chief Constable and was giving assistance to Mr Dryden’s neighbour who was a judge. Mr Dryden, while in prison, saw a note from the late Lord Chief Justice Taylor. It stated that any new evidence submitted by Mr Dryden in support of an appeal should be ignored. Home Secretary Straw was, according to Mr Dryden, supposed to review his case last August.

*** Re The programme "Unreliable Evidence" broadcast on 15 February 2000 by ‘Above the Title Productions’.

A dishonest portrayal of Litigants in Person! It is not the system that gives rise to litigants in person but the sheer dishonesty of some judges and lawyers conspiring together to pervert the course of justice.

The programme failed dismally to give the real reasons for dispensing with legal representation. To obtain a balanced programme you should have invited the secretary and the president of the Litigants in Person Society. ***

Comment: The new Director General of the BBC has made large cash contributions to the Labour Party no doubt in the hope that he would be awarded a peerage. No BBC programme is likely to break new ground in exposing the charlatans of New Labour. The man who makes honest citizens vexatious litigants is a Labour politician with the discredited title of Attorney General. He is obliged at all times to act in the public interest but always appears to be acting in the private interest. See the Scriven case.

3. Letter dated 16 February 2000 from VOMIT to Amanda Davies of British Telecom, OXFORD.

*** Dear Madam, Your phone no. 0800 671704 Your fax 01865 240 352

Anonymous threatening calls have been made to 01494 871204 on the following occasions.

Monday 14 February 2000 - 3 calls one after the other between 1716 and 1720 hours.

Tuesday 15 February 2000 – 1 call at 1049 hours.

Please identify the number(s) from which the calls were made. Please identify the subscriber(s). In view of the nature of the calls perhaps you would fax me the information without delay.

Yours faithfully, pp VOMIT ***

Comment: We will be surprised if this woman Davies provides the service she is supposed to provide. The first call was authoritarian from a reasonably well-spoken male who said that he was a policeman but refused to specify the force. When he proceeded with a warning he was told to "piss off". There were immediately after that two calls on an answering machine. It was obviously the same idiot and probably a policeman. He used foul language and threats and adopted a Yorkshire accent. Next morning the same clown telephoned and was the recipient of foul language. We believe that our story about drugs and being out of control angered the police. Note that it was ACPO (the Association of Chief Police Officers) who made the statement. We pointed out the non-sequiturs. On 16 February Keith Halliwell, "The Drug Tsar" was engaged in damage limitation. He said that the police had drugs under control but there was still an increase in the supply. We are of the informed opinion that drugs can be ordered on the Internet via Germany and are dispatched from Cape Town and Miami. Kohl, Craxi, Mitterand, Nixon and Blair! The Seychelles provide the major facility for recycling drug money. The drug business is the largest business in the whole world.

On Thursday 17 February on UK TV Channel 4 (Despatches) serious allegations were made against Customs & Excise whose officers are under investigation for corruption. They have been guilty of perjury and violations of international and national law. We fed Customs & Excise Intelligence Unit first class information about the drug site. Because Customs never acknowledged receipt of information we assumed that they did not wish to alert the drug barons. Now the evidence suggests that both the police and Customs & Excise are dealing in hard drugs. We still await action against Thames Valley Police, Lord Wilson of Tillyorn and OFGEM regulator Colin McCarthy following the police raids here last August when a bent copper set us up for a police marksman.

The proletariat tends to see the Inland Revenue and Customs officers as paragons of virtue. Nothing could be further from the truth. Years ago our VAT man called upon us and said that he felt that we had overpaid VAT. On that basis we allowed him to borrow our accounts books. Later we learned that he simply wanted to copy our books because the company with which we had most of our business was about to burn down its premises in Westbourne Grove, London W2. The VAT man returned our books and said that there was no mistake. We checked and decided that we had been overcharged and told him that we were deducting a few thousand pounds from our cheque to Customs. Later we found that there had been no mistake. We were allowed to keep the money.

Simon Brown was involved with the adjacent drug site here as early as 1988 when we were framed by the police 4 days before Barclays Bank Trust Company defrauded the Combined Charities Trust out of the drug site – a site for which we were the highest bidder. The Magistrate was a member of the Beaconsfield Lodge. He was named Nicholson and had two female assessors named Sawtell and Hogarth. There was sufficient in the magistrates’ order to oblige Simon Brown to order the magistrates to state a case for the High Court. He considered the case papers in private and marked his order "refused" and "misconceived". As is usual he was backed on appeal by firstly Taylor and Henry and then by Russell, Butler Sloss and Dillon. The odd man out amongst the judges is Dillon. He presided at our appeal and read out a long prepared judgement. When we gave the shorthand writers our script the judgement was cut in half. Until now we had to say that all those judges misdirected themselves but thanks to the Scriven precedent we can say that we believe that they betrayed their judicial oath and were therefore guilty of a serious criminal offence. Apart from Dillon the judges are all well known to litigants in person. Taylor is dead. Russell retired under a cloud. Henry and Simon Brown were promoted to LJ. Do we hear the "wry laughter" of Simon Brown, Butler Sloss and Henry?

On 7 February there was an article in the Guardian by Marcel Berlins. He told the story about the Australian solicitor who said that a judge "had his hand on his dick" when he issued an injunction. The solicitor was found not guilty of contempt of court in that he had not undermined the confidence in the administration of justice. Berlins related this to the attempt to imprison Geoffrey Scriven (Fax 0161 428 1159) for "scandalising the Court" but did not go as far as to say that in the UK there is no confidence to undermine.

During the week there were three articles published in "The Lawyer"(14/2), "The Independent"(15/2) and "The Times"(15/2) law report. All dealt primarily with the Scriven case and the gagging writ. None of the articles specified clearly that the problems arose from the failure of certain members of the judiciary to adhere to their judicial oath. The three reporters Joshua Rosenberg writing in The Lawyer, Robert Verlaik of the Independent and Frances Gibb of the Times are constrained by the Blair propaganda machine, the D Notice Committee and The Official Secrets Act as well as their legal advisers and presumably the editors and owners of their publications. Newspapers are effectively censored.

The Chairman of the D Notice Committee is Rear Admiral Pulvertaft whose qualifications and impartiality we question. The President of the Official Secrets Court is Lord Justice Simon Brown whose impartiality we have questioned for 12 years.

Rozenberg begins his spiel by brown nosing the Establishment. He states "It is well known that going to court can drive you mad. These days legal reporters can’t walk down the street without people thrusting files of papers at them. You long to tell these litigants to accept defeat and cut their losses. But is too late – they’re gripped by an obsession." That is indeed rich coming from a Jew married to the Jew Melanie Philips who wrote for the Observer and now writes for the Times. She is obsessed by the Holocaust, as are millions of Jews. Switch on the TV or radio, view a film, read a newspaper and you are reminded again and again of the cruelty to the Jews, the compensation they are claiming from Germany, Switzerland and like countries and the demand for billions of dollars to persuade them to return the Golan Heights to Syria. That also covers the cost of the Israeli bombs that are being rained on Lebanon. We have had a Holocaust Memorial thrust upon us and now there is a National Holocaust day. If anyone should understand the tenacity born of the burning hatred of injustice it should be Rosenberg and every Jew on earth. There is a further irony of the UK justice system in that injustice is frequently meted out by a disproportionate number of Jewish judges.

No! We are not advocating Anti-Semitism. We are advocating solidarity between the Jews and the many litigants in person who are dying prematurely on account of the hardship and injustice they have suffered. How would the Jewish claimants react if courts declared them vexatious litigants? How would they feel if they were effectively barred from the courts of law for life no matter how meritorious their causes were? Note that many of the litigants in person are Jewish and include people who, with their families, fled from Nazi Germany. As we have stated over and over again some Jews and some Masons are more equal than others. In passing we would say that it is high time that Jews stopped emphasising their exclusiveness. We recently had Gerald Kaufman, MP, riding his high horse on TV and insulting that most gentle and courteous of news reporters, Jon Snow. The outcry against the democratic election of Jorg Haider’s party to the Austrian government brought protests from all over the world while covert anti Semites congratulated each other. There are more anti Semites in the world than there are Jews. Anti Semites are probably in the majority in the UK but political correctness has priority over honesty. Let us never have another Holocaust.

Mr Scriven will appeal against the judgement of Simon Brown and may succeed in persuading him to retire from the bench. The Attorney General, a Law Lord named Williams of Mostyn, should also retire from both government and bench. In Simon Brown’s bench notes there is written, "If attorney not prepared to lend name – not sure he ought to be relying on undertaking". The "attorney" is clearly the Attorney General - the man who was moving to have Mr Scriven imprisoned and declared vexatious. This would appear to invalidate the whole proceedings against Mr Scriven. Also Suzon Forscey-Moore wrote to the Attorney General before the hearing advising him of an Early Day Motion signed by 15 MPs supporting Geoffrey Scriven. Parliament was prorogued before the motion could be discussed but clearly 15 MPs felt that Mr Scriven was not a vexatious litigant. After the hearing the Attorney General denied having received the Forscey-Moore letter. Guilty people in high places resort to this lie with monotonous regularity.

Doctors are having a lean time. Manchester mass murder! Wrong kidney! Hysterectomy! Hospital infections! Psychological amputations at a price! Bristol child deaths and whistleblower’s emigration to escape from Freemasonry!

Valentine Powell High Sheriff of Hampshire is ignoring correspondence from Gerald Coulter (Ph/Fax 01926 262726). His Under Sheriff, solicitor J I Kennedy, who has no indemnity, cannot act as a solicitor. Kennedy was found out because he tried to claim compensation from Mr Coulter. We are getting a little tired of the confusion arising from whose bailiwick contains Bournemouth and whether an Under Sheriff has to be a solicitor. Kennedy has carried out many operations on behalf of the High Sheriff of Hampshire. Mr Coulter claims that all past operations are subject to legal challenges and claims for damages and costs against the High Sheriff on whose behalf Kennedy was acting. Kennedy’s indemnity should have covered the claims against the High Sheriff. There seems little doubt that Powell should have arrested Kennedy and had him charged with fraud and deception. His failure to do so would indicate that Powell is guilty of misprision of felony and of misconduct in public office.

Mr Yeatman is High Sheriff of Dorset (Fax 01202 680470) apart from Bournemouth which has Pudding Head Powell and Kennedy as High Sheriff and Under Sheriff. To muddy the waters Kennedy who was clearly involved in Mr Coulter’s persecution stated that Mr Yeatman was the High Sheriff for Bournemouth.

The bottom line is that Pudding Head may have to sell his farm to meet his liabilities before he goes to prison. As an added punishment he may be dubbed up in his peter with Kennedy. Chief Constable Stichbury may have to resign for her delay in having the scoundrels prosecuted. Is there a ladies’ prison in Dorset?

APOLOGIES

Overloaded!. The Ebert (Fax 0181 455 5165) case is fascinating particularly when solicitors draft their own court orders, move for bankruptcy and the Attorney General moves for a Section 42 gagging writ against Mr Ebert. Simon Brown (S B) has again put his foot in it over Pinochet. Mr Ebert queered S B’s pitch too. S B refused Mr Scriven witnesses including Mr Ebert. Barry Hunt (Ph/Fax 01305 777348) is still battling away as is Lomond Handley (Ph/Fax 01202 738982). The Masefields continue to fight the good fight.

CAMPAIGN FOR A FAIR HEARING, PO Box 54, Cambridge CB5 8BB. Fax 01223 327042.

Ph 01223 327634 (Organiser - Suzon Forscey-Moore, American Law Researcher)

POW TRUST, (A registered benevolent and social welfare charity) 295a Queenstown Road,

London SW8 3NP. Tel.0171 720 9767 Fax 0171 498 0477 (Gen.Secy. Peter Sainsbury).

TRY "PUNCH" AND BUY "PUNCH"(£1.50 fortnightly) Punch Letters,100 Brompton Road,

SAFE (Struggle Against Financial Exploitation). Leader Keith Whinchip (Ph/Fax 0181 855 2006)

Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU

Per pro Vomit. No copyright. Tel 01494 871204. Fax 01494 870031